Literature DB >> 33786493

Advanced Breast Cancer at Diagnosis: Over One Third Adherent to Screening Recommendations.

Orli Friedman-Eldar1,2, Douglas Zippel2,3, Helit Guy-Chen4, Shlomi Eitan Gur4, Noa Ben-Baruch5, Eran Sharon3,6, Tanir M Allweis1,7.   

Abstract

Background: Advanced breast cancer (ABC) at diagnosis carries a worse prognosis, and can be attributed to delay in diagnosis, failure of screening tests, or aggressive biology. Better understanding of factors related with ABC at diagnosis could help decrease the proportion of such cases. Patients and
Methods: This is a retrospective study of all patients diagnosed and treated for breast cancer (BC) at a single institution between 2012 and 2015. Data were collected from medical records and phone interviews, and included demographic, clinical, and tumor-related data, and adherence to screening recommendations.
Results: Of 555 newly diagnosed BC patients, 390 (70.3%) were diagnosed early (stage 0-IIa), and 165 (29.7%) were diagnosed with ABC (stage IIb-IV). Of the165 patients diagnosed with ABC, 57 (34.5%) underwent screening mammography as recommended. More patients with ABC were <50 years (29.1% vs. 19%, p = 0.006). ABC was associated with higher grade, higher proliferation rate, Her2/neu overexpression, luminal B-like, and triple negative phenotypes. Mammography within 30 months of diagnosis was more prevalent among those diagnosed early (64.6% vs. 34.5%, p = 0.003). Only 31 (18.8%) of the screening eligible patients who were diagnosed at advanced stage did not adhere to screening recommendations. Conclusions: ABC at diagnosis is related to aggressive tumor biology and age <50 years. It is also associated with lower adherence to screening mammography; however, more than one third of patients diagnosed with ABC who were eligible for screening underwent screening mammography as recommended. Further research is needed to elucidate factors related with ABC at diagnosis, review screening guidelines, and develop more effective screening modalities. © Orli Friedman-Eldar et al. 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  advanced breast cancer; screening adherence; screening mammography

Year:  2020        PMID: 33786493      PMCID: PMC7784813          DOI: 10.1089/whr.2020.0044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)        ISSN: 2688-4844


  16 in total

1.  When statistics provide unsatisfying answers: revisiting the breast self-examination controversy.

Authors:  Barron H Lerner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  The role of clinical breast examination in cancer screening for women at average risk: A mini review.

Authors:  Meagan E Brennan
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  16-year mortality from breast cancer in the UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-05       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up?

Authors:  Stephen H Taplin; Laura Ichikawa; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; M Michele Manos; Ann M Geiger; Sheila Weinmann; Joyce Gilbert; Judy Mouchawar; Wendy A Leyden; Robin Altaras; Robert K Beverly; Deborah Casso; Emily Oakes Westbrook; Kimberly Bischoff; Jane G Zapka; William E Barlow
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-10-20       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  BRCA1/2 mutations and triple negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Beth N Peshkin; Michelle L Alabek; Claudine Isaacs
Journal:  Breast Dis       Date:  2010

Review 6.  Disparities in breast cancer stage at diagnosis in urban and rural adult women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sallyanne Nguyen-Pham; Janni Leung; Deirdre McLaughlin
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  Patient's and doctor's delay in primary breast cancer. Prognostic implications.

Authors:  P Afzelius; K Zedeler; H Sommer; H T Mouridsen; M Blichert-Toft
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  The relationship of symptoms and psychological factors to delay in seeking medical care for breast symptoms.

Authors:  Geraldine Meechan; John Collins; Keith J Petrie
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Socioeconomic background in relation to stage at diagnosis, treatment and survival in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  A Downing; K Prakash; M S Gilthorpe; J S Mikeljevic; D Forman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Stage of breast cancer at diagnosis in New Zealand: impacts of socio-demographic factors, breast cancer screening and biology.

Authors:  Sanjeewa Seneviratne; Ross Lawrenson; Vernon Harvey; Reena Ramsaroop; Mark Elwood; Nina Scott; Diana Sarfati; Ian Campbell
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.