Literature DB >> 21778580

BRCA1/2 mutations and triple negative breast cancers.

Beth N Peshkin1, Michelle L Alabek, Claudine Isaacs.   

Abstract

Identifying breast cancer patients at increased risk for carrying a mutation in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes is an important objective in clinical practice. Although age at diagnosis, family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer, and ethnicity are all essential parameters to consider when assessing risk, there are limitations as to how well such factors accurately predict BRCA1/2 status, even when quantitative risk models are applied. Integrating information about triple negative (TN) disease may help refine these estimates. Among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, fewer than 10% have a mutation in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes, and up to 20% present However, among BRCA1 mutation carriers at least one-third have TN breast cancers. In this paper, we review key studies that have assessed breast cancer cases with a known BRCA1/2 status and triple marker data. We also discuss how integrating such information into qualitative and quantitative risk assessments of BRCA1/2 carrier probability may improve the ability to identify women who are appropriate candidates for genetic testing. Identifying women at increased risk is critical as knowledge of mutation status may impact surgical and systemic treatment in newly diagnosed patients, as well as recommendations for ovarian cancer risk management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21778580      PMCID: PMC3870050          DOI: 10.3233/BD-2010-0306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Dis        ISSN: 0888-6008


  44 in total

1.  A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO.

Authors:  D G R Evans; D M Eccles; N Rahman; K Young; M Bulman; E Amir; A Shenton; A Howell; F Lalloo
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 2.  Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Morphology of breast cancer as a means of triage of patients for BRCA1 genetic testing.

Authors:  Gelareh Farshid; Rosemary L Balleine; Margaret Cummings; Paul Waring
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 6.394

4.  Association of risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers with cancer risk and mortality.

Authors:  Susan M Domchek; Tara M Friebel; Christian F Singer; D Gareth Evans; Henry T Lynch; Claudine Isaacs; Judy E Garber; Susan L Neuhausen; Ellen Matloff; Rosalind Eeles; Gabriella Pichert; Laura Van t'veer; Nadine Tung; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Fergus J Couch; Wendy S Rubinstein; Patricia A Ganz; Mary B Daly; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Gail Tomlinson; Joellen Schildkraut; Joanne L Blum; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  The prevalence of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in young women with breast cancer undergoing breast-conservation therapy.

Authors:  Mehra Golshan; Alex Miron; Asa J Nixon; Judy E Garber; Ethan P Cash; James Dirk Iglehart; Jay R Harris; Julia S Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.

Authors:  D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Major improvement in the efficacy of BRCA1 mutation screening using morphoclinical features of breast cancer.

Authors:  R Lidereau; F Eisinger; M H Champème; C Noguès; I Bièche; D Birnbaum; C Pallud; J Jacquemier; H Sobol
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Optimal selection of individuals for BRCA mutation testing: a comparison of available methods.

Authors:  Paul A James; Rebecca Doherty; Marion Harris; Bickol N Mukesh; Alvin Milner; Mary-Anne Young; Clare Scott
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Clinical and pathological characteristics of Chinese patients with BRCA related breast cancer.

Authors:  Ava Kwong; L P Wong; H N Wong; F B F Law; E K O Ng; Y H Tang; W K Chan; D T K Suen; C Choi; L S Ho; K H Kwan; M Poon; T T Wong; K Chan; S W W Chan; M W L Ying; W C Chan; E S K Ma; J M Ford; D W West
Journal:  Hugo J       Date:  2010-04-10

10.  Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Deann P Atchley; Constance T Albarracin; Adriana Lopez; Vicente Valero; Christopher I Amos; Ana Maria Gonzalez-Angulo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Banu K Arun
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  55 in total

1.  Frequency of pathogenic germline mutations in cancer susceptibility genes in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Raman Preet Kaur; Gowhar Shafi; Raja Paramjeet Singh Benipal; Anjana Munshi
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Characterization of a novel germline BRCA1 splice variant, c.5332+4delA.

Authors:  Ciyu Yang; Sowmya Jairam; Kimberly A Amoroso; Mark E Robson; Michael F Walsh; Liying Zhang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 3.  Genome-Wide Association Studies of Chemotherapeutic Toxicities: Genomics of Inequality.

Authors:  Brandon Mapes; Omar El Charif; Shereen Al-Sawwaf; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Prediction of BRCA1 germline mutation status in women with ovarian cancer using morphology-based criteria: identification of a BRCA1 ovarian cancer phenotype.

Authors:  Mika Fujiwara; Valerie A McGuire; Anna Felberg; Weiva Sieh; Alice S Whittemore; Teri A Longacre
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 5.  Therapeutic Implications of the Molecular and Immune Landscape of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ana C Gregório; Manuela Lacerda; Paulo Figueiredo; Sérgio Simões; Sérgio Dias; João Nuno Moreira
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 3.201

6.  Synthetic Lethality of PARP Inhibitors in Combination with MYC Blockade Is Independent of BRCA Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jason P W Carey; Cansu Karakas; Tuyen Bui; Xian Chen; Smruthi Vijayaraghavan; Yang Zhao; Jing Wang; Keith Mikule; Jennifer K Litton; Kelly K Hunt; Khandan Keyomarsi
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  US incidence of breast cancer subtypes defined by joint hormone receptor and HER2 status.

Authors:  Nadia Howlader; Sean F Altekruse; Christopher I Li; Vivien W Chen; Christina A Clarke; Lynn A G Ries; Kathleen A Cronin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Genetic Counseling Referral Rates in Long-Term Survivors of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Carlos H Barcenas; Maryam N Shafaee; Arup K Sinha; Akshara Raghavendra; Babita Saigal; Rashmi K Murthy; Ashley H Woodson; Banu Arun
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.908

9.  Deleterious BRCA1/2 mutations in an urban population of Black women.

Authors:  Filipa Lynce; Karen Lisa Smith; Julie Stein; Tiffani DeMarco; Yiru Wang; Hongkun Wang; Melissa Fries; Beth N Peshkin; Claudine Isaacs
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 Study.

Authors:  Rita Nanda; Laura Q M Chow; E Claire Dees; Raanan Berger; Shilpa Gupta; Ravit Geva; Lajos Pusztai; Kumudu Pathiraja; Gursel Aktan; Jonathan D Cheng; Vassiliki Karantza; Laurence Buisseret
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.