Literature DB >> 33786221

Implementation of an Audience Response System in a Case Conference Curriculum: Results of a Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin1, Katherine Lester1, Laura Thomas2,1, Leigh M Eck1, Jessica R Newman3.   

Abstract

Audience response systems engage learners and facilitate the assimilation of the material. We assessed whether incorporation of one system into a resident case conference would increase retention of information and attentiveness. Pre-tests were administered prior to case conferences. The University Hospital incorporated Poll Everywhere into a conference and the Veterans Administration hospital did not. Participants rated self-perceived attentiveness and completed a post-test following conference. There was an increase in post-test scores compared to pre-tests. There was no significant difference in self-perceived attentiveness or post-test scores between sites. The use of audience response did not increase retention of material or perceived attentiveness when incorporated into the conference.
Copyright © 2021, Mohyuddin et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  audience response system; case conference; curriculum development; medical education

Year:  2021        PMID: 33786221      PMCID: PMC7992913          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


  14 in total

1.  Successful lecturing: a prospective study to validate attributes of the effective medical lecture.

Authors:  H L Copeland; D L Longworth; M G Hewson; J K Stoller
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Experiences of using an interactive audience response system in lectures.

Authors:  Matti Uhari; Marjo Renko; Hannu Soini
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Audience response system: effect on learning in family medicine residents.

Authors:  T Eric Schackow; Milton Chavez; Lauren Loya; Michael Friedman
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits.

Authors:  Thomas J Nasca; Ingrid Philibert; Timothy Brigham; Timothy C Flynn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Duty hours reforms in the United States, France, and Canada: is it time to refocus our attention on education?

Authors:  Sarah I Woodrow; Christophe Segouin; Judith Armbruster; Stanley J Hamstra; Brian Hodges
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Audience response systems in medical student education benefit learners and presenters.

Authors:  Lina Nayak; Joseph P Erinjeri
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Effect of an audience response system on resident learning and retention of lecture material.

Authors:  Eva Ilse Rubio; Matthew J Bassignani; Marney A White; William E Brant
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Resident and attending physician attitudes regarding an audience response system.

Authors:  Justin W Kung; Priscilla J Slanetz; Po-Hao Chen; Karen S Lee; Kevin Donohoe; Ronald L Eisenberg
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Morning report: can an established medical education tradition be validated?

Authors:  Matthew McNeill; Sayed K Ali; Daniel E Banks; Ishak A Mansi
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-09

10.  Effect of the 2011 vs 2003 duty hour regulation-compliant models on sleep duration, trainee education, and continuity of patient care among internal medicine house staff: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Sanjay V Desai; Leonard Feldman; Lorrel Brown; Rebecca Dezube; Hsin-Chieh Yeh; Naresh Punjabi; Kia Afshar; Michael R Grunwald; Colleen Harrington; Rakhi Naik; Joseph Cofrancesco
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 21.873

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.