| Literature DB >> 33785771 |
Iram Shahzadi1, Maryam A Al-Ghamdi2, Muhammad Shahid Nadeem2, Muhammad Sajjad1,3, Asif Ali1, Jalaluddin Azam Khan2, Imran Kazmi4.
Abstract
Endoglucanase (EC 3.2.1.4) catalysing the hydrolysis of β-1.4-glycosidic linkage of cellulose molecules is an enzyme of tremendous industrial importance. The present study describes a response surface methodology based predicted model to deduce a set of fermentation conditions for optimum growth and activity of recombinant endoglucanase in E. coli BL21 (DE3). Numerous significant parameters including fermentation media composition, temperature (Celsius), pH and agitation rate (rpm) were analysed systemically by employing central composite design. This effort reports highly efficient recombinant endoglucanase overproduction (6.9 gl-1 of biomass) with 30% expression by E. coli in modified M9NG media incubated at 37 °C and pH 7 agitated at 200 rpm. Addition of 3 mM glucose and 24 mM glycerol in the M9NG media has shown positive effect on the enzyme yield and activity. The CMCase activity experimentally estimated was found to be 1185 U/mg with the optimized parameters. The outcomes of both the responses by the predicted quadratic model were found in consensus with the obtained values. Our results well depicted the favourable conditions to further scale-up the volumetric yield of other relevant recombinant enzymes and proteins.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33785771 PMCID: PMC8009960 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86000-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Quadratic model predicted responses of the fermentation parameters by using central composite design.
| Run | Space type | Temperature (°C) | pH | Agitation (rpm) | Cell growth (g/l) | CMCase activity (U/ml) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Center | (0)37 | (0)7 | (0)200 | 6.5 | 1165 |
| 2 | Center | (0)37 | (0)7 | (0)200 | 6.5 | 1165 |
| 3 | Factorial | (− 1)28 | (− 1)5.5 | (+ 1)250 | 2.2 | 130 |
| 4 | Factorial | (+ 1)46 | (+ 1)8.5 | (− 1)150 | 1.5 | 325 |
| 5 | Center | (0)37 | (0)7 | (0)200 | 6.5 | 1165 |
| 6 | Factorial | (− 1)28 | (+ 1)8.5 | (− 1)150 | 1.8 | 140 |
| 7 | Factorial | (+ 1)46 | (− 1)5.5 | (− 1)150 | 2.5 | 280 |
| 8 | Center | (0)37 | (0)7 | (0)200 | 6.5 | 1165 |
| 9 | Factorial | (− 1)28 | (− 1)5.5 | (− 1)150 | 2.8 | 320 |
| 10 | Factorial | (+ 1)46 | (+ 1)8.5 | (+ 1)250 | 2.5 | 330 |
| 11 | Factorial | (− 1)28 | (+ 1)8.5 | (+ 1)250 | 3.5 | 270 |
| 12 | Factorial | (+ 1)46 | (− 1)5.5 | (+ 1)250 | 2.5 | 155 |
| 13 | Axial | (0)37 | (+ α)9.52269 | (0)200 | 3.5 | 250 |
| 14 | Center | (0)37 | (0)7 | (0)200 | 6.5 | 1165 |
| 15 | Axial | (0)37 | (0)7 | (− α)115.91 | 3 | 300 |
| 16 | Center | (0)37 | (0)7 | (0)200 | 6.5 | 1165 |
| 17 | Axial | (+ α)52.1361 | (0)7 | (0)200 | 0.65 | 80 |
| 18 | Axial | (0)37 | (0)7 | (+ α)284.09 | 3.5 | 345 |
| 19 | Axial | (0)37 | (− α)4.47731 | (0)200 | 2 | 110 |
| 20 | Axial | (− α)21.8639 | (0)7 | (0)200 | 0.7 | 95 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of quadratic model for cell growth of E. coli BL21 (3A) and CMCase activity (3B).
| Source | Sum of squares (SS) | Degree of freedom (df) | Mean square (MS) | F-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 81.84 | 9 | 9.09 | 56.56 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
| A-temp | 0.1403 | 1 | 0.1403 | 0.8725 | 0.3746 | |
| B-pH | 0.2433 | 1 | 0.2433 | 1.51 | 0.2498 | |
| C-agitation | 0.6333 | 1 | 0.6333 | 3.94 | 0.0785 | |
| AB | 0.2112 | 1 | 0.2112 | 1.31 | 0.2812 | |
| AC | 0.0012 | 1 | 0.0012 | 0.0078 | 0.9317 | |
| BC | 1.36 | 1 | 1.36 | 8.47 | 0.0173 | |
| A2 | 55.33 | 1 | 55.33 | 344.15 | < 0.0001 | |
| B2 | 21.66 | 1 | 21.66 | 134.75 | < 0.0001 | |
| C2 | 15.87 | 1 | 15.87 | 98.71 | < 0.0001 | |
| Residual | 1.45 | 9 | 0.1608 | |||
| Lack of fit | 1.45 | 5 | 0.2894 | |||
| Model | 3.028E+06 | 9 | 3.365E+05 | 30.19 | < 0.0001 | Significant |
| A-temp | 3070.40 | 1 | 3070.40 | 0.2755 | 0.6123 | |
| B-pH | 12,638.31 | 1 | 12,638.31 | 1.13 | 0.3147 | |
| C-agitation | 796.85 | 1 | 796.85 | 0.0715 | 0.7952 | |
| AB | 8450.00 | 1 | 8450.00 | 0.7582 | 0.4065 | |
| AC | 450.00 | 1 | 450.00 | 0.0404 | 0.8452 | |
| BC | 25,312.50 | 1 | 25,312.50 | 2.27 | 0.1661 | |
| A2 | 1.507E+06 | 1 | 1.507E+06 | 135.19 | < 0.0001 | |
| B2 | 1.217E+06 | 1 | 1.217E+06 | 109.23 | < 0.0001 | |
| C2 | 8.321E+05 | 1 | 8.321E+05 | 74.66 | < 0.0001 | |
| Residual | 1.003E+05 | 9 | 11,144.79 | |||
| Lack of fit | 23,928.11 | 5 | 4785.62 | 0.2506 | 0.9193 | Insignificant |
Figure 12D contour plots and 3D response surface plot for recombinant cellulase production depicting interactive effects between (A) temperature and pH, (B) pH and agitation rate and (C) temperature and agitation rate. Design expert version 11 software used from web site: www.statease.com.
Sequences and their respective ΔG values (RBS: ribosome binding site of pET22b vector).
| Sequence (RBS > + 10 codon) | |
|---|---|
| − 4.0 | |
| RBS + 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 + 6 + 7 + 8 + 9 + 10 | |
| − 2.8 | |
| − 4.0 | |
| − 5.4 | |
| − 4.8 | |
| − 4.0 | |
| − 4.3 | |
| − 2.8 | |
| − 2.8 | |
| − 4.8 | |
| − 6.4 | |
| − 4.0 | |
| − 6.1 | |
| − 3.8 | |
| − 2.8 | |
| − 2.8 | |
| − 4.8 | |
| − 4.0 | |
| − 4.0 |
Figure 2SDS-PAGE expression analysis for recombinant cellulase. M: Protein marker (BioLabs-P7706L), Lane U, U′: Un-induced samples, Lane I, I′: Samples with IPTG induction, Lane L, L′: Lactose induction, Lane Z, Z′: Zymogram of recombinant cellulase against CMC; in modified M9NG and LB media respectively.
Figure 3(A) Time course of recombinant cellulase fermentation by E. coli BL21 (DE3) in LB (□) and modified M9NG media (♦) over 16 h of shake flask fermentation. Effect of (B) temperature, (C) pH and (D) agitation rate on recombinant cellulase fermentation by E. coli BL21 (DE3) determined by incubating at different fermentation temperature, pH and agitation rates respectively. Wet cell weight (♦), recombinant cellulase expression (□).