| Literature DB >> 33785003 |
Ashley Amson1, Lauren Remedios1, Adena Pinto1, Monique Potvin Kent2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to unhealthy food and beverage content is a contributing factor to the obesity epidemic. Youth are susceptible to unhealthy digital food marketing including content shared by their peers, which can be as influential as commercial marketing. Current Canadian regulations do not consider the threat digital food marketing poses to health. No research to date has examined the prevalence of food related posts on social media surrounding family-friendly events. The aim of this study was to explore the frequency of food related content (including food marketing) and the marketing techniques employed in social media posts related to a family-friendly event in Canada.Entities:
Keywords: Beverages; Case study; Digital marketing; Family-friendly event; Food; Social media; Social norms; Youth
Year: 2021 PMID: 33785003 PMCID: PMC8011127 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10716-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Frequency of food and beverage related content linked to Winterlude by social media application
| Social media application | Winterlude ( | Businesses ( | Sponsored Individuals ( | Non-profit organizations ( | Individuals ( | Total ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 (51.4)a | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 19 (2.6) | |
| 6 (16.2)a,c | 63 (31.8)a,b | 4 (57.1)a,b | 22 (55.0)b | 57 (12.7)c | 152 (20.8) | |
| 12 (32.4)a | 135 (68.2)b | 3 (42.9)a,b | 18 (45.0)a,b | 393 (87.3)c | 561 (76.6) |
Significant differences between social media application and post source were derived by Fisher’s Freeman-Halton test using a Monte Carlo estimation of 10,000 samples to determine the p value, < 0.0001(95%CI < 0.0001–0.0005). Letters within rows denote proportions that differ significantly according to post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction
Frequency of likes for food and beverage related content linked to Winterlude by source
| Number of likes | Winterlude ( | Businesses ( | Sponsored Individuals ( | Non-profit organizations ( | Individuals ( | Total ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 likes | 4 (12.1)a | 7 (3.5)a,b | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.5)a,b | 4 (0.9)b | 16 (2.2) |
| 1–50 likes | 26 (78.8)a,b | 111 (56.1)a | 4 (57.1)a,b | 33 (82.5)b | 326 (72.4)b,c | 500 (68.7) |
| 51–200 likes | 3 (9.1)a | 70 (35.4)b | 1 (14.3)a,b | 5 (12.5)a | 111 (24.7)a,b | 190 (26.1) |
| Over 200 likes | 0 (0.0) | 10 (5.1)a,b | 2 (28.6)a | 1 (2.5)a,b | 9 (2.0)b | 22 (3.0) |
Significant differences between number of likes and post source were dervied by Fisher’s Freeman-Halton test using a Monte Carlo estimation of 10,000 samples to determine the p value, < 0.0001(95%CI < 0.0001–0.0005). Letters within rows denote proportions that differ significantly according to post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction. All Instagram stories (where it is not possible to “like” story content) were excluded from this analysis
Ranking of food and beverage categories promoted in social media posts linked to Winterlude by source
| Winterlude accounts ( | Businesses ( | Sponsored individuals ( | Non-profit organizations ( | Individuals ( | Total ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n(%) | |
| Fast food 21 (56.8) | Dine-in restaurants 80 (40.4) | Fast food 4 (57.1) | Fast food 21 (52.5) | Fast food 249 (55.3) | Fast food 328 (44.8) | |
| Energy drinks 8 (21.6) | Fast food 33 (16.7) | Candy 2 (28.6) | Candy 9 (22.5) | Candy 82 (18.2) | Dine-in restaurants 126 (17.2) | |
| Candy 2 (5.4) | Sweet baked goods 23 (11.6) | Dine-in restaurants 1 (14.3) | Alcohol 4 (10.0) | Dine-in restaurants 42 (9.3) | Candy 105 (14.3) | |
| Other 2 (5.4) | Alcohol 20 (10.1) | Meals 1 (14.3) | Dine-in restaurants 3 (7.5) | Other beverage 35 (7.8) | Other beverage 50 (6.8) | |
| Veg and fruit 2 (5.4) | Other beverage 13 (6.6) | Sweet baked goods 3 (7.5) | Alcohol 25 (5.6) | Alcohol 49 (6.7) |
It was possible for more than one food category to be present in a single social media post
Top five food and beverage sponsors promoted in social media posts linked to Winterlude by source
| Food companies | Winterlude ( | Businesses ( | Sponsored individuals ( | Non-profit organizations ( | Individuals ( | Tota ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beavertails | 5 (17.2)a,b | 13 (8.3) a | 3 (42.9)b,c | 17 (63.0)c | 203 (68.4)c,d | 241 (46.7) | < 0.0001 |
| Tim Hortons | 19 (65.5)a | 3 (1.9) b | 1 (14.3)a,b,c | 4 (14.8)c | 35 (11.8)c,d | 62 (12.0) | < 0.0001 |
| Wasabi Ottawa | 0 (0.0) | 21 (13.5) a | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 21 (4.1) | < 0.0001 |
| Red Bull | 8 (27.6)a | 1 (0.6)b | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (1.3) b | 13 (2.5) | < 0.0001 |
| Starbucks Canada | 0 (0.0) | 4 (2.6) a | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 5 (1.7) a | 9 (1.7) | 0.8458 |
| Other Companies | 0 (0.0) | 118 (75.6) a | 3 (42.9)a,b | 8 (29.6)b | 65 (21.9)b,c | 194 (37.6) | < 0.0001 |
Differences in post features were compared between account types using the chi square test for Beavertails and the Fisher’s exact test as appropriate for all other companies (including “other companies). Letters within rows denote proportions that differ significantly according to post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction. It was possible for more than one food company to be present in a single social media post. Any social media posts without any food company identified were excluded from this analysis
Frequency of marketing features linked to Winterlude by post source
| Post feature | Winterlude ( | Businesses ( | Sponsored individuals ( | Non-profit organizations ( | Individuals ( | Total ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child prominently featured (% yes) | 4 (10.8) a,b | 5 (2.5) a, | 0 (0.0) | 8 (20.0) b,c | 107 (23.8) c | 124 (16.9) | <.0001* |
| Adolescent prominently featured (% yes) | 2 (5.4) a | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 19 (4.2) a | 21 (2.9) | 0.0076** |
| Presence of family (% yes) | 3 (8.1) a | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.0) a | 52 (11.6) a | 57 (7.8) | <.0001** |
| Product intended for children (% yes) | 2 (5.4) a | 22 (11.1) b | 0 (0.0) | 10 (25.0) b | 84 (18.7) b | 118 (16.1) | 0.013* |
| Use of price promotions (% yes) | 0 (0.0) | 15 (7.6) a | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.0) a | 0 (0.0) | 17 (2.3) | <.0001** |
| Free product giveaway (% yes) | 0 (0.0) | 12 (6.1) a | 0 (0.0) | 2 (5.0) a,b | 3 (0.7) b | 17 (2.3) | 0.0008** |
| Encouragement of peer-to-peer marketing (% yes) | 0 (0.0) | 7 (3.5) a | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.5) a | 0 (0.0) | 8 (1.1) | 0.0012** |
| Contest (% yes) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (2.0) a | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.2) b | 5 (0.7) | 0.1616** |
| Celebrity endorsements (% yes) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.5) a | 1 (14.3) b | 0 (0.0) | 5 (1.1) a | 7 (1.0) | 0.1286** |
| Use of promotional characters (% yes) | 1 (2.7) a | 3 (1.5) a | 0 (0.0) | 1 (2.5) a | 5 (1.1) a | 10 (1.4) | 0.3973** |
Differences in post features were compared between account types using the chi square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. Letters within rows denote proportions that differ significantly according to post-hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction. It was possible for more than one post feature to be present in a single social media post
*p-values derived from chi square test
**p-values derived from Fisher’s exact test