Literature DB >> 33782860

The role of metacognition and schematic support in younger and older adults' episodic memory.

Mary C Whatley1, Alan D Castel2.   

Abstract

Older adults experience deficits in associative memory. However, age-related differences are reduced when information is consistent with prior knowledge (i.e., schematic support), suggesting that episodic and semantic memory are interrelated. It is unclear what role metacognitive processes play in schematic support. Prior knowledge may reduce encoding demands, but older adults may allocate cognitive resources to schema-consistent information because it is more meaningful. We examined metacognitive awareness of and control over associative information that was consistent or inconsistent with prior knowledge. In Experiment 1, participants self-paced their study of grocery items paired with either market prices or unusually high prices and were tested on the exact price of each item over four study-test lists with new items on each list. In Experiment 2, participants studied items for a fixed time but made judgments of learning (JOLs) at encoding. Older adults better remembered the prices of market-value items than overpriced items. In Experiment 1, younger and older adults studied overpriced items longer than market-priced items, consistent with a discrepancy reduction model of self-regulated learning, but study time did not relate to later recall accuracy, suggesting a labor-in-vain effect. In Experiment 2, participants gave higher JOLs to market-priced items than overpriced items and were generally metacognitively aware of the benefits of schematic support. Together, these results suggest that the benefits of schematic support may not be dependent on or influenced by metacognitive control processes, supporting the hypothesis that episodic memory may be less distinct from semantic memory in younger and older adults.
© 2021. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Associative memory; Metacognition; Schematic support; Self-paced learning

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33782860      PMCID: PMC8478969          DOI: 10.3758/s13421-021-01169-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  67 in total

1.  G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Albert-Georg Lang; Axel Buchner
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-05

2.  Aging and deficits in associative memory: what is the role of strategy production?

Authors:  J Dunlosky; C Hertzog
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1998-12

3.  Do judgments of learning modify older adults' actual learning?

Authors:  Sarah K Tauber; Amber E Witherby
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2019-07-01

4.  Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation?

Authors:  G Mazzoni; C Cornoldi; G Marchitelli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-03

5.  A meta-analysis and systematic review of reactivity to judgements of learning.

Authors:  Kit S Double; Damian P Birney; Sarah A Walker
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2017-11-21

6.  Selecting valuable information to remember: age-related differences and similarities in self-regulated learning.

Authors:  Alan D Castel; Kou Murayama; Michael C Friedman; Shannon McGillivray; Ian Link
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2012-12-31

7.  Does task affordance moderate age-related deficits in strategy production?

Authors:  Sara Bottiroli; John Dunlosky; Kate Guerini; Elena Cavallini; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2010-06-15

8.  An individual differences analysis of ability and strategy influences: age-related differences in associative learning.

Authors:  W A Rogers; C Hertzog; A D Fisk
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Self-regulated learning in younger and older adults: does aging affect metacognitive control?

Authors:  Jodi Price; Christopher Hertzog; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2009-10-28

10.  Type I error inflation in the traditional by-participant analysis to metamemory accuracy: a generalized mixed-effects model perspective.

Authors:  Kou Murayama; Michiko Sakaki; Veronica X Yan; Garry M Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.