Literature DB >> 33780010

Report of Task Group 201 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine: Quality management of external beam therapy data transfer.

R Alfredo Siochi1, Peter Balter2, Charles D Bloch3, Lakshmi Santanam4, Kurt Blodgett5, Bruce H Curran6, Martijn Engelsman7, Wenzheng Feng8, James Mechalakos4, Daniel Pavord5, Thomas Simon9, Steven Sutlief10, X Ronald Zhu2.   

Abstract

With the advancement of data-intensive technologies, such as image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the amount and complexity of data to be transferred between clinical subsystems have increased beyond the reach of manual checking. As a result, unintended treatment deviations (e.g., dose errors) may occur if the treatment system is not closely monitored by a comprehensive data transfer quality management program (QM). This report summarizes the findings and recommendations from the task group (TG) on quality assurance (QA) of external beam treatment data transfer (TG-201), with the aim to assist medical physicists in designing their own data transfer QM. As a background, a section of this report describes various models of data flow (distributed data repositories and single data base systems) and general data test characteristics (data integrity, interpretation, and consistency). Recommended tests are suggested based on the collective experience of TG-201 members. These tests are for the acceptance of, commissioning of, and upgrades to subsystems that store and/or modify clinical treatment data. As treatment complexity continues to evolve, we will need to do and know more about ensuring the quality of data transfers. The report concludes with the recommendation to move toward data transfer open standards compatibility and to develop tools that automate data transfer QA.
© 2021 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  29.1 (TH- Dataset analysis/biomathematics; 3(IM/TH- Formal quality management tools; 31.1 (TH- External beam- photons; General (most aspects); General (most aspects)); Informatics); Root Cause Analysis); Taxonomy: 25.1; data transfer; information systems; quality assurance; quality control; quality management program

Year:  2021        PMID: 33780010     DOI: 10.1002/mp.14868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  2 in total

1.  Readiness for Radiation Treatment Continuity: Survey on Contingency Plans Against Cyberattacks.

Authors:  ByongYong Yi; Amit Sawant; Shifeng Chen; Sung-Woo Lee; Baoshe Zhang
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-09-16

2.  AAPM MEDICAL PHYSICS PRACTICE GUIDELINE 5.b: Commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations-Megavoltage photon and electron beams.

Authors:  Mark W Geurts; Dustin J Jacqmin; Lindsay E Jones; Stephen F Kry; Dimitris N Mihailidis; Jared D Ohrt; Timothy Ritter; Jennifer B Smilowitz; Nicholai E Wingreen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 2.243

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.