| Literature DB >> 33779053 |
Leslie K Ballas1, Stephanie Navarro2, Chunqiao Luo2, Croix C Fossum1, Albert Farias2, Siamak Daneshmand3, Susan Groshen2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In surgical series of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), women have higher recurrence rates, disease progression, and mortality following radical cystectomy than men. Similar reports of oncologic differences between men and women following trimodality therapy (TMT) are rare. Our hypothesis was that there would be no difference in overall survival (OS) between sexes receiving TMT.Entities:
Keywords: bladder preservation; muscle-invasive bladder cancer; sex-based disparities; trimodality therapy
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33779053 PMCID: PMC8085939 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3835
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Med ISSN: 2045-7634 Impact factor: 4.452
FIGURE 1Flow chart of identification of patients with confirmed AJCC cT2‐T4aN0 M0 urothelial cancer of the bladder who underwent TMT during the years of 2004 and 2016
Characteristics of patients receiving trimodality therapy group. N (%) or median (Q1, Q3)
| Total number | Male | Female |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age at diagnosis in years | 77 (69, 83) | 78 (70, 83) | 0.030 |
| Race | <0.001 | ||
| White | 1386 (93%) | 407 (86%) | |
| Black | 63 (4.2%) | 56 (12%) | |
| Asian/other/unknown | 39 (2.6%) | 9 (1.9%) | |
| Total RT dose | 6480 (6300, 6480) | 6480 (6166, 6480) | 0.037 |
| Income | 0.72 | ||
| Less than $38,000 | 237 (16%) | 82 (17%) | |
| $38,000–$47,999 | 346 (23%) | 117 (25%) | |
| $48,000–$62,999 | 400 (27%) | 118 (25%) | |
| $63,000+ | 494 (33%) | 153 (33%) | |
| Number of missing | 11 | 2 | |
| Urban/rural | 0.40 | ||
| Metro | 1204 (83%) | 387 (84%) | |
| Urban | 218 (15%) | 65 (14%) | |
| Rural | 33 (2.3%) | 6 (1.3%) | |
| Number of missing | 33 | 14 | |
| Charlson/Deyo score | 0.091 | ||
| No comorbid conditions recorded | 949 (64%) | 324 (69%) | |
| 1 | 371 (25%) | 95 (20%) | |
| Greater than or equal to 2 | 168 (11%) | 53 (11%) | |
| Type of Insurance | 0.45 | ||
| Private insurance/managed care/other government | 296 (20%) | 85 (18%) | |
| Not insured/Medicaid | 59 (4.0%) | 15 (3.2%) | |
| Medicare | 1120 (76%) | 368 (79%) | |
| Number of missing | 13 | 4 | |
| Treatment facility type | 0.89 | ||
| Community cancer program | 172 (12%) | 50 (11%) | |
| Comprehensive community cancer program | 693 (47%) | 227 (48%) | |
| Academic/research program | 410 (28%) | 130 (28%) | |
| Integrated network cancer program | 213 (14%) | 64 (14%) | |
| Number of missing | 0 | 1 | |
| Treatment facility location | 0.31 | ||
| New England | 99 (6.7%) | 33 (7.0%) | |
| Middle Atlantic | 264 (18%) | 81 (17%) | |
| South Atlantic | 316 (21%) | 113 (24%) | |
| East North Central | 305 (20%) | 94 (20%) | |
| East South Central | 68 (4.6%) | 25 (5.3%) | |
| West North Central | 111 (7.5%) | 32 (6.8%) | |
| West South Central | 41 (2.8%) | 22 (4.7%) | |
| Mountain | 71 (4.8%) | 19 (4.0%) | |
| Pacific | 213 (14%) | 52 (11%) | |
| Number of missing | 0 | 1 | |
| Distance between zip code and treating facility (miles) | 8 (4, 18) | 6 (3, 16) | <0.001 |
| Number of missing | 9 | 1 | |
| AJCC clinical T stage at diagnosis | 0.070 | ||
| T2 | 1232 (83%) | 394 (83%) | |
| T3 | 143 (9.6%) | 55 (12%) | |
| T4a | 113 (7.6%) | 23 (4.9%) |
There are 38 Hispanic patients, among which all are White, 32 are male and 6 are female.
FIGURE 2Males versus females in overall survival (A) and relative survival (B)
Conditional survival: probability of surviving one more year given that a patient has already survived 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 years since start of treatment
| Time interval |
|
Conditional overall survival probability (95% CI) |
Relative conditional survival probability (95% CI) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female |
| Male | Female |
| |
| [0, 1] | 1488 | 472 | 0.83 [0.81, 0.85] | 0.79 [0.76, 0.83] | 0.093 | 0.88 [0.86, 0.9] | 0.83 [0.79, 0.87] | 0.030 |
| [1, 2] | 1180 | 361 | 0.73 [0.7, 0.75] | 0.68 [0.64, 0.74] | 0.16 | 0.77 [0.74, 0.8] | 0.72 [0.67, 0.77] | 0.11 |
| [2, 3] | 770 | 221 | 0.78 [0.75, 0.82] | 0.77 [0.71, 0.83] | 0.60 | 0.83 [0.8, 0.86] | 0.8 [0.74, 0.86] | 0.41 |
| [3, 4] | 524 | 146 | 0.82 [0.78, 0.85] | 0.88 [0.83, 0.94] | 0.050 | 0.86 [0.83, 0.9] | 0.92 [0.86, 0.98] | 0.094 |
| [4, 5] | 374 | 109 | 0.83 [0.79, 0.87] | 0.89 [0.83, 0.95] | 0.12 | 0.87 [0.83, 0.91] | 0.92 [0.86, 0.99] | 0.17 |
| [5, 6] | 268 | 88 | 0.85 [0.81, 0.9] | 0.85 [0.78, 0.93] | 0.99 | 0.89 [0.84, 0.94] | 0.89 [0.81, 0.97] | 0.94 |
| [6, 7] | 188 | 69 | 0.82 [0.76, 0.88] | 0.75 [0.65, 0.86] | 0.32 | 0.86 [0.8, 0.92] | 0.78 [0.68, 0.9] | 0.30 |
| [7, 8] | 124 | 45 | 0.85 [0.79, 0.92] | 0.81 [0.7, 0.94] | 0.53 | 0.89 [0.82, 0.96] | 0.84 [0.73, 0.97] | 0.55 |
| [8, 9] | 91 | 30 | 0.88 [0.82, 0.95] | 0.87 [0.75, 1] | 0.87 | 0.92 [0.85, 0.99] | 0.91 [0.78, 1.06] | 0.94 |
Calculated as conditional overall survival probability divided by expected conditional survival probability. The expected conditional survival probability is the expected survival probability of the general population matched by year, age, race, and sex conditioned on surviving through the time before each time interval. p‐values are based on the logrank test for overall survival and using the logrank‐like test for relative survival.
Cox proportional hazards regression on overall survival and relative survival from start of treatment with up to 9 years of follow‐up
| Overall survival | Relative survival | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Female sex | 1.01 (0.88, 1.15) | 0.94 | 1.43 (1.25, 1.64) | <0.001 |
| Age at diagnosis | 1.03 (1.02, 1.04) | <0.001 | 0.94 (0.93, 0.94) | <0.001 |
| Non‐White race | 1.12 (0.9, 1.38) | 0.31 | 0.91 (0.74, 1.13) | 0.40 |
| Median household income | ||||
| Less than $38,000 | ||||
| $38,000–$47,999 | 0.98 (0.82, 1.18) | 0.87 | 0.99 (0.82, 1.19) | 0.94 |
| $48,000–$62,999 | 0.92 (0.77, 1.11) | 0.40 | 0.93 (0.77, 1.11) | 0.42 |
| $63,000+ | 0.88 (0.73, 1.06) | 0.17 | 0.89 (0.74, 1.07) | 0.20 |
|
Urban/rural residence | ||||
| Metro | ||||
| Urban | 1.03 (0.87, 1.21) | 0.77 | 1.04 (0.88, 1.22) | 0.69 |
| Rural | 1.81 (1.2, 2.74) | 0.005 | 1.84 (1.22, 2.78) | 0.004 |
| Charlson/Deyo score | ||||
| No comorbid conditions recorded | ||||
| 1 | 1.23 (1.08, 1.41) | 0.002 | 1.24 (1.08, 1.41) | 0.002 |
| Greater than or equal to 2 | 1.71 (1.43, 2.03) | <0.001 | 1.71 (1.44, 2.04) | <0.001 |
| Type of insurance | ||||
| Private insurance/managed care/ other government | ||||
| Not insured/ Medicaid | 1.5 (1.05, 2.14) | 0.024 | 1.41 (0.99, 2.01) | 0.056 |
| Medicare | 1.22 (1.03, 1.44) | 0.019 | 1.24 (1.05, 1.46) | 0.012 |
| Treatment facility type | ||||
| Community cancer program | ||||
| Comprehensive community cancer program | 0.92 (0.77, 1.11) | 0.39 | 0.92 (0.77, 1.11) | 0.39 |
| Academic/research program | 0.94 (0.77, 1.15) | 0.55 | 0.95 (0.77, 1.16) | 0.59 |
| Integrated network cancer program | 0.89 (0.71, 1.12) | 0.32 | 0.9 (0.72, 1.13) | 0.35 |
| Treatment facility location | ||||
| New England | ||||
| Middle Atlantic | 0.93 (0.72, 1.2) | 0.57 | 0.93 (0.72, 1.2) | 0.57 |
| South Atlantic | 0.95 (0.74, 1.23) | 0.70 | 0.94 (0.73, 1.22) | 0.66 |
| East North Central | 1.04 (0.81, 1.34) | 0.76 | 1.03 (0.8, 1.33) | 0.79 |
| East South Central | 0.7 (0.49, 1.02) | 0.062 | 0.71 (0.49, 1.02) | 0.063 |
| West North Central | 0.92 (0.68, 1.25) | 0.59 | 0.92 (0.67, 1.24) | 0.57 |
| West South Central | 1.23 (0.85, 1.8) | 0.28 | 1.21 (0.83, 1.77) | 0.31 |
| Mountain | 1.26 (0.89, 1.77) | 0.19 | 1.27 (0.9, 1.78) | 0.18 |
| Pacific | 0.83 (0.63, 1.1) | 0.19 | 0.84 (0.64, 1.11) | 0.22 |
| Distance between zip code and treating facility | 1 (1, 1) | 0.33 | 1 (1, 1) | 0.28 |
| AJCC clinical T stage at diagnosis | ||||
| T2, T2a, or T2b | ||||
| T3, T3a, or T3b | 1.36 (1.14, 1.64) | <0.001 | 1.36 (1.13, 1.63) | <0.001 |
| T4 or T4a | 1.35 (1.1, 1.67) | 0.005 | 1.33 (1.08, 1.65) | 0.007 |