Literature DB >> 24331151

Gender-specific differences in clinicopathologic outcomes following radical cystectomy: an international multi-institutional study of more than 8000 patients.

Luis A Kluth1, Malte Rieken2, Evanguelos Xylinas3, Matthew Kent4, Michael Rink5, Morgan Rouprêt6, Nasim Sharifi5, Asha Jamzadeh7, Wassim Kassouf8, Dharam Kaushik9, Stephen A Boorjian9, Florian Roghmann10, Joachim Noldus10, Alexandra Masson-Lecomte11, Dimitri Vordos11, Masaomi Ikeda12, Kazumasa Matsumoto12, Masayuki Hagiwara13, Eiji Kikuchi13, Yves Fradet14, Jonathan Izawa15, Ricardo Rendon16, Adrian Fairey17, Yair Lotan18, Alexander Bachmann19, Marc Zerbib20, Margit Fisch5, Douglas S Scherr7, Andrew Vickers4, Shahrokh F Shariat21.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of gender on the staging and prognosis of urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) is insufficiently understood.
OBJECTIVE: To assess gender-specific differences in pathologic factors and survival of UCB patients treated with radical cystectomy (RC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from 8102 patients treated with RC (6497 men [80%] and 1605 women [20%]) for UCB between 1971 and 2012 were analyzed. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Multivariable competing-risk regression analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship of gender on disease recurrence (DR) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). We also tested the interaction of gender and tumor stage, nodal status, and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Female patients were older at the time of RC (p=0.033) and had higher rates of pathologic stage T3/T4 disease (p<0.001). In univariable, but not in multivariable analysis, female gender was associated with a higher risk of DR (p=0.022 and p=0.11, respectively). Female gender was an independent predictor for CSM (p=0.004). We did not find a significant interaction between gender and stage, nodal metastasis, or LVI (all p values >0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: We found female gender to be associated with a higher risk of CSM following RC. However, these findings do not appear to be explained by gender differences in pathologic stage, nodal status, or LVI. This gender disparity may be due to differences in care and/or the biology of UCB.
Copyright © 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Disease recurrence; Gender; Prognosis; Radical cystectomy; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24331151     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  21 in total

1.  Impact of body mass index on the oncological outcomes of patients treated with radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yohann Dabi; Yohann Rouscoff; Julien Anract; Nicolas Barry Delongchamps; Mathilde Sibony; Djillali Saighi; Marc Zerbib; Michael Peyraumore; Evanguelos Xylinas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  The impact of female gender on bladder cancer-specific death risk after radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis of 27,912 patients.

Authors:  Shenghua Liu; Tian Yang; Rong Na; Mengbo Hu; Limin Zhang; You Fu; Haowen Jiang; Qiang Ding
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Prognostic value of Ki67 and p63 expressions in bladder cancer patients who underwent radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Lujia Wang; Minwei Zhou; Chenchen Feng; Peng Gao; Guanxiong Ding; Zhongwen Zhou; Haowen Jiang; Zhong Wu; Qiang Ding
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Mitochondrial DNA Content as Risk Factor for Bladder Cancer and Its Association with Mitochondrial DNA Polymorphisms.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Yuanqing Ye; Maosheng Huang; David W Chang; Ashish M Kamat; Xia Pu; Colin P Dinney; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-04-20

5.  Dataset for the reporting of carcinoma of the bladder-cystectomy, cystoprostatectomy and diverticulectomy specimens: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR).

Authors:  E Compérat; J R Srigley; F Brimo; B Delahunt; M Koch; A Lopez-Beltran; V Reuter; H Samaratunga; J H Shanks; T Tsuzuki; T van der Kwast; M Varma; F Webster; D Grignon
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Significance of lymphovascular invasion in organ-confined, node-negative urothelial cancer of the bladder: data from the prospective p53-MVAC trial.

Authors:  Friedrich-Carl von Rundstedt; Douglas A Mata; Susan Groshen; John P Stein; Donald G Skinner; Walter M Stadler; Richard J Cote; Oleksandr N Kryvenko; Guilherme Godoy; Seth P Lerner
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  The effect of androgen deprivation treatment on subsequent risk of bladder cancer diagnosis in male patients treated for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Marco Moschini; Emanuele Zaffuto; Pierre Karakiewicz; Agostino Mattei; Giorgio Gandaglia; Nicola Fossati; Francesco Montorsi; Alberto Briganti; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  The difference between men and women.

Authors:  Melanie Clyne
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 9.  Radical Cystectomy in Female Patients - Improving Outcomes.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kalampokis; Nikolaos Grivas; Markus Ölschläger; Fahmy Nabil Hassan; Georgios Gakis
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Disparities in male versus female oncologic outcomes following bladder preservation: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Leslie K Ballas; Stephanie Navarro; Chunqiao Luo; Croix C Fossum; Albert Farias; Siamak Daneshmand; Susan Groshen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-03-28       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.