Literature DB >> 33778903

 Time until union in absolute vs. relative stability MIPO plating in simple humeral shaft fractures.

Ignacio Rellán1, Gerardo Luis Gallucci2, Agustin Guillermo Donndorff2, Pablo De Carli2, Ezequiel Ernesto Zaidenberg2, Marc Joseph Richard3, Jorge Guillermo Boretto2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of absolute stability (AS) versus relative stability (RS) performed through a minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in AO/OTA 12A1 and 12A2 fractures on healing and the time to radiographic union.
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients treated with plate fixation for AO/OTA type 12A1-A2 fractures at a single institution. Patients were grouped according to the type of stability used in their surgery. Time until radiographic union was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, which was compared by long-rank test between both types of surgical techniques.
RESULTS: A total of 70 patients were included in this study with 35 patients in each group. The median follow-up was 9 (IQR 6-14) months. The median time to radiographic union was significantly lower in the AS group than in the RS group: 12 (interquartile range (IQR) 10-14) weeks versus 18 (IQR 16-19) weeks, respectively (p < 0.001). Non-union was seen in two cases (7%) in the relative stability group. Three patients in the RS group developed a post-operative radial nerve palsy.
CONCLUSION: The main finding of this study is that the median time to radiographic union was significantly shorter in the patients treated with AS compared to those with a RS technique. These findings support the recommendations of the AO foundation in that simple metaphyseal fractures (type A) that require surgical treatment should be treated with an AS construct. RS techniques should be reserved to multifragmentary fractures where fragment preservation of blood supply is paramount.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Absolute stability; Fracture; Humerus; MIPO ORIF; Relative stability

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33778903     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-02920-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  21 in total

1.  Plating osteosynthesis of mid-distal humeral shaft fractures: minimally invasive versus conventional open reduction technique.

Authors:  Zhiquan An; Bingfang Zeng; Xiaojian He; Qi Chen; Shundong Hu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Shoulder function after surgical treatment of displaced fractures of the humeral shaft: a randomized trial comparing antegrade intramedullary nailing with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis.

Authors:  Eduardo Benegas; Arnaldo Amado Ferreira Neto; Mauro Emilio Conforto Gracitelli; Eduardo Angeli Malavolta; Jorge Henrique Assunção; Flávia De Santis Prada; Raul Bolliger Neto; Rames Mattar
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Comparison between antegrade intramedullary nailing (IMN), open reduction plate osteosynthesis (ORPO) and minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) in treatment of humerus diaphyseal fractures.

Authors:  Vidisha Sunil Kulkarni; Madhura Sujay Kulkarni; Govind Shivram Kulkarni; Vaibhav Goyal; Milind Govind Kulkarni
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.586

4.  Is minimally invasive plating osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fracture advantageous compared with the conventional open technique?

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Jianmin Li; Ying Li; Guofeng Dai; Manyi Wang
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 5.  Minimally invasive plating versus either open reduction and plate fixation or intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Erik Hohmann; Vaida Glatt; Kevin Tetsworth
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Plating of humeral shaft fractures: comparison of standard conventional plating versus minimally invasive plating.

Authors:  C-W Oh; Y-S Byun; J-K Oh; J-J Kim; I-H Jeon; J-H Lee; K-H Park
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2011-12-26       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Minimal invasive ostheosintesis for treatment of diaphiseal transverse humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  Rodrigo Kallás Zogaib; Steven Morgan; Paulo Santoro Belangero; Hélio Jorge Alvachian Fernandes; William Dias Belangero; Bruno Livani
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.513

8.  Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of proximal humeral fracture.

Authors:  T W Lau; F Leung; C F Chan; S P Chow
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Absolute or relative stability in plate fixation for simple humeral shaft fractures.

Authors:  B J M van de Wall; C Theus; B C Link; N van Veelen; R J H van de Leeuwen; C Ganzert; R Babst; F J P Beeres
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  A prospective randomized study of operative treatment for noncomminuted humeral shaft fractures: conventional open plating versus minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis.

Authors:  Ji Wan Kim; Chang-Wug Oh; Young-Soo Byun; Jung Jae Kim; Ki Chul Park
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.512

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.