Literature DB >> 33778578

Mitral Valve Flow and Myocardial Motion Assessed with Dual-Echo Dual-Velocity Cardiac MRI.

Afis Ajala1, Jiming Zhang1, Amol Pednekar1, Erick Buko1, Luning Wang1, Benjamin Y Cheong1, Pei-Herng Hor1, Raja Muthupillai1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop a dual-echo phase-contrast (DEPC) MRI approach with which each echo is acquired by using a different velocity sensitivity within one repetition time (TR) and demonstrate the feasibility of this approach to measure transmitral blood flow (E) and myocardial tissue (E m) velocities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The flow across tubes of known diameter was measured by using the proposed DEPC method and compared with flowmeter measurements and theoretic predictions. Then, with both the DEPC MRI sequence and the conventional single-echo phase-contrast (SEPC) MRI sequence, E, E m, and E/E m were measured in six healthy volunteers (mean age, 49 years ± 13 [standard deviation]) and eight patients (mean age, 54 years ± 15) being evaluated for cardiac disease. Differences between the DEPC and conventional SEPC MRI methods were assessed by percent error, Pearson correlation, and Bland-Altman analyses.
RESULTS: Velocities measured in vitro and in vivo by using the SEPC and DEPC MRI approaches were well correlated (r 2 > 0.97), with negligible bias (<0.5 cm/sec) and comparable velocity-to-noise ratios. Imaging times were approximately 19% shorter with the DEPC method (TR, 5.7 msec) than with the SEPC method (TR, 2.8 msec ± 4.2) (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: The proposed DEPC method was sensitive to two velocity regimes within a single TR, resulting in a shorter imaging time compared with the imaging time in conventional SEPC MRI. Preliminary human study results suggest the feasibility of using this approach to estimate E/E m.Supplemental material is available for this article.© RSNA, 2020. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33778578      PMCID: PMC7977974          DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2020190126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging        ISSN: 2638-6135


  21 in total

1.  Estimation of relative cardiovascular pressures using time-resolved three-dimensional phase contrast MRI.

Authors:  T Ebbers; L Wigström; A F Bolger; J Engvall; M Karlsson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 2.  Applications of phase-contrast flow and velocity imaging in cardiovascular MRI.

Authors:  Peter D Gatehouse; Jennifer Keegan; Lindsey A Crowe; Sharmeen Masood; Raad H Mohiaddin; Karl-Friedrich Kreitner; David N Firmin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography.

Authors:  Sherif F Nagueh; Christopher P Appleton; Thierry C Gillebert; Paolo N Marino; Jae K Oh; Otto A Smiseth; Alan D Waggoner; Frank A Flachskampf; Patricia A Pellikka; Arturo Evangelisa
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2009-03

4.  Deriving a blood-mimicking fluid for particle image velocimetry in Sylgard-184 vascular models.

Authors:  Majid Y Yousif; David W Holdsworth; Tamie L Poepping
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

5.  Multi-VENC acquisition of four-dimensional phase-contrast MRI to improve precision of velocity field measurement.

Authors:  Hojin Ha; Guk Bae Kim; Jihoon Kweon; Young-Hak Kim; Namkug Kim; Dong Hyun Yang; Sang Joon Lee
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Optimal Dual-VENC Unwrapping in Phase-Contrast MRI.

Authors:  Hugo Carrillo; Axel Osses; Sergio Uribe; Cristobal Bertoglio
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 7.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2018 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Emelia J Benjamin; Salim S Virani; Clifton W Callaway; Alanna M Chamberlain; Alexander R Chang; Susan Cheng; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Francesca N Delling; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; Jane F Ferguson; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Pamela L Lutsey; Jason S Mackey; David B Matchar; Kunihiro Matsushita; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Martin O'Flaherty; Latha P Palaniappan; Ambarish Pandey; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew D Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Gary M Satou; Svati H Shah; Nicole L Spartano; David L Tirschwell; Connie W Tsao; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Three-point phase-contrast velocity measurements with increased velocity-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  A T Lee; G B Pike; N J Pelc
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  MRI in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Authors:  Rahul G Muthalaly; Nitesh Nerlekar; Yin Ge; Raymond Y Kwong; Arthur Nasis
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Improved method for quantification of regional cardiac function in mice using phase-contrast MRI.

Authors:  Erica Dall'Armellina; Bernd A Jung; Craig A Lygate; Stefan Neubauer; Michael Markl; Jürgen E Schneider
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  1 in total

1.  A phantom study comparing radial trajectories for accelerated cardiac 4D flow MRI against a particle imaging velocimetry reference.

Authors:  Philip A Corrado; Rafael Medero; Kevin M Johnson; Christopher J François; Alejandro Roldán-Alzate; Oliver Wieben
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.737

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.