Literature DB >> 33778548

Applying Nitroglycerin at Coronary MR Angiography at 1.5 T: Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Vasodilation in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Shi-Hai Zhao1, Chen-Guang Li1, Yin-Yin Chen1, Hong Yun1, Meng-Su Zeng1, Hang Jin1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of applying nitroglycerin (NTG) on detecting significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and NTG-induced coronary vasodilation using coronary MR angiography in patients suspected of having CAD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective study conducted from November 2017 to September 2018, 70 consecutive participants suspected of having CAD were recruited. Of those, 57 patients successfully underwent pre- and post-NTG coronary MR angiography, both of which were performed during the end-systolic phase of the cardiac cycle. Significant coronary stenosis was defined at x-ray coronary angiography as stenosis of 50% or more. Participants were divided into a significant CAD group (significant stenosis) and nonsignificant CAD group (no significant stenosis) based on x-ray coronary angiography. Paired and unpaired Student t, generalized linear mixed model, and McNemar tests were used.
RESULTS: The diagnostic performance of coronary MR angiography was significantly improved after NTG (P < .001). Per-patient for coronary MR angiography, from before to after NTG, respectively, the sensitivity was 97.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.6%, 99.9%) to 97.6% (95% CI: 85.6%, 99.9%), specificity was 25.0% (95% CI: 8.3%, 52.5%) to 62.5% (95% CI: 35.9%, 83.7%), positive predictive value was 76.9% (95% CI: 62.8%, 87.0%) to 87.0% (95% CI: 73.0%, 94.6%), negative predictive value was 80.0% (95% CI: 29.9%, 98.9%) to 90.9% (95% CI: 57.1%, 99.5%), and accuracy was 77.2% (95% CI: 66.3%, 88.1%) to 87.7% (95% CI: 79.2%, 96.3%). The NTG-induced coronary vasodilation was significantly lower in the significant CAD group compared with the nonsignificant CAD group.
CONCLUSION: Administration of NTG significantly improved the diagnostic performance of coronary MR angiography for detecting significant CAD; however, NTG-induced coronary vasodilation was impaired in patients with significant CAD.© RSNA, 2020See also commentary by François in this issue. 2020 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33778548      PMCID: PMC7977752          DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2020190018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging        ISSN: 2638-6135


  26 in total

1.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  P J Scanlon; D P Faxon; A M Audet; B Carabello; G J Dehmer; K A Eagle; R D Legako; D F Leon; J A Murray; S E Nissen; C J Pepine; R M Watson; J L Ritchie; R J Gibbons; M D Cheitlin; T J Gardner; A Garson; R O Russell; T J Ryan; S C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-05-04       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association.

Authors:  W G Austen; J E Edwards; R L Frye; G G Gensini; V L Gott; L S Griffith; D C McGoon; M L Murphy; B B Roe
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Hajime Sakuma; Yasutaka Ichikawa; Shuji Chino; Tadanori Hirano; Katsutoshi Makino; Kan Takeda
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Prognostic impact of coronary vasodilator dysfunction on adverse long-term outcome of coronary heart disease.

Authors:  V Schächinger; M B Britten; A M Zeiher
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-04-25       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Dynamic expansion of the coronary arteries: implications for intravascular ultrasound measurements.

Authors:  N J Weissman; I F Palacios; A E Weyman
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 6.  Endothelial dysfunction: a marker of atherosclerotic risk.

Authors:  Piero O Bonetti; Lilach O Lerman; Amir Lerman
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 8.311

7.  Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial.

Authors:  Shingo Kato; Kakuya Kitagawa; Nanaka Ishida; Masaki Ishida; Motonori Nagata; Yasutaka Ichikawa; Kazuhiro Katahira; Yuji Matsumoto; Koji Seo; Reiji Ochiai; Yasuyuki Kobayashi; Hajime Sakuma
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Nitrate-induced coronary vasodilation by stress-magnetic resonance imaging: a novel noninvasive test of coronary vasomotion.

Authors:  Alessia Pepe; Massimo Lombardi; Imola Takacs; Vincenzo Positano; Gaetano Panzarella; Eugenio Picano
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Coronary MR imaging: effect of timing and dose of isosorbide dinitrate administration.

Authors:  Peng Hu; Michael L Chuang; Long H Ngo; Christian T Stoeck; Dana C Peters; Kraig V Kissinger; Beth Goddu; Lois A Goepfert; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Sublingual Nitroglycerin Administration in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Richard A P Takx; Dominika Suchá; Jakob Park; Tim Leiner; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.