Literature DB >> 33778525

Radiomics for Distinguishing Myocardial Infarction from Myocarditis at Late Gadolinium Enhancement at MRI: Comparison with Subjective Visual Analysis.

Tommaso Di Noto1, Jochen von Spiczak1, Manoj Mannil1, Elena Gantert1, Paolo Soda1, Robert Manka1, Hatem Alkadhi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether radiomics features of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) regions at cardiac MRI enable distinction between myocardial infarction (MI) and myocarditis and to compare radiomics with subjective visual analyses by readers with different experience levels.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, institutional review board-approved study, consecutive MRI examinations of 111 patients with MI and 62 patients with myocarditis showing LGE were included. By using open-source software, classification performances attained from two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) texture analysis, shape, and first-order descriptors were compared, applying five different machine learning algorithms. A nested, stratified 10-fold cross-validation was performed. Classification performances were compared through Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Supervised and unsupervised feature selection techniques were tested; the effect of resampling MR images was analyzed. Subjective image analysis was performed on 2D and 3D image sets by two independent, blinded readers with different experience levels.
RESULTS: When trained with recursive feature elimination (RFE), a support vector machine achieved the best results (accuracy: 88%) for 2D features, whereas linear discriminant analysis (LDA) showed the highest accuracy (85%) for 3D features (P <.05). When trained with principal component analysis (PCA), LDA attained the highest accuracy with both 2D (86%) and 3D (89%; P =.4) features. Results found for classifiers trained with spline resampling were less accurate than those achieved with one-dimensional (1D) nearest-neighbor interpolation (P <.05), whereas results for classifiers trained with 1D nearest-neighbor interpolation and without resampling were similar (P =.1). As compared with the radiomics approach, subjective visual analysis performance was lower for the less experienced and higher for the experienced reader for both 2D and 3D data.
CONCLUSION: Radiomics features of LGE permit the distinction between MI and myocarditis with high accuracy by using either 2D features and RFE or 3D features and PCA.© RSNA, 2019Supplemental material is available for this article. 2019 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 33778525      PMCID: PMC7977789          DOI: 10.1148/ryct.2019180026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging        ISSN: 2638-6135


  21 in total

1.  Optimal number of features as a function of sample size for various classification rules.

Authors:  Jianping Hua; Zixiang Xiong; James Lowey; Edward Suh; Edward R Dougherty
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Characterization of normal and scarred myocardium based on texture analysis of cardiac computed tomography images.

Authors:  S Antunes; A Esposito; A Palmisanov; C Colantoni; F de Cobelli; A Del Maschio
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

3.  Multi-atlas segmentation with augmented features for cardiac MR images.

Authors:  Wenjia Bai; Wenzhe Shi; Christian Ledig; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Influence of gray level discretization on radiomic feature stability for different CT scanners, tube currents and slice thicknesses: a comprehensive phantom study.

Authors:  Ruben T H M Larue; Janna E van Timmeren; Evelyn E C de Jong; Giacomo Feliciani; Ralph T H Leijenaar; Wendy M J Schreurs; Meindert N Sosef; Frank H P J Raat; Frans H R van der Zande; Marco Das; Wouter van Elmpt; Philippe Lambin
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 4.089

5.  Subacute and Chronic Left Ventricular Myocardial Scar: Accuracy of Texture Analysis on Nonenhanced Cine MR Images.

Authors:  Bettina Baessler; Manoj Mannil; Sabrina Oebel; David Maintz; Hatem Alkadhi; Robert Manka
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in myocarditis: A JACC White Paper.

Authors:  Matthias G Friedrich; Udo Sechtem; Jeanette Schulz-Menger; Godtfred Holmvang; Pauline Alakija; Leslie T Cooper; James A White; Hassan Abdel-Aty; Matthias Gutberlet; Sanjay Prasad; Anthony Aletras; Jean-Pierre Laissy; Ian Paterson; Neil G Filipchuk; Andreas Kumar; Matthias Pauschinger; Peter Liu
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Applications and limitations of radiomics.

Authors:  Stephen S F Yip; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Myocarditis Reveals Persistent Disease Activity Despite Normalization of Cardiac Enzymes and Inflammatory Parameters at 3-Month Follow-Up.

Authors:  Jan Berg; Jan Kottwitz; Nora Baltensperger; Christine K Kissel; Marina Lovrinovic; Tarun Mehra; Frank Scherff; Christian Schmied; Christian Templin; Thomas F Lüscher; Bettina Heidecker; Robert Manka
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 8.790

9.  Texture analysis of cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging to detect nonviable segments in patients with chronic myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Andrés Larroza; María P López-Lereu; José V Monmeneu; Jose Gavara; Francisco J Chorro; Vicente Bodí; David Moratal
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype.

Authors:  Joost J M van Griethuysen; Andriy Fedorov; Chintan Parmar; Ahmed Hosny; Nicole Aucoin; Vivek Narayan; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Steve Pieper; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  4 in total

1.  Sensitivity of Myocardial Radiomic Features to Imaging Parameters in Cardiac MR Imaging.

Authors:  Jihye Jang; Hossam El-Rewaidy; Long H Ngo; Jennifer Mancio; Ibolya Csecs; Jennifer Rodriguez; Patrick Pierce; Beth Goddu; Ulf Neisius; Warren Manning; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 5.119

2.  Texture-based probability mapping for automatic scar assessment in late gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Vidar Frøysa; Gøran J Berg; Trygve Eftestøl; Leik Woie; Stein Ørn
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2021-12-03

Review 3.  Multimodality Advanced Cardiovascular and Molecular Imaging for Early Detection and Monitoring of Cancer Therapy-Associated Cardiotoxicity and the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Big Data.

Authors:  Jennifer M Kwan; Evangelos K Oikonomou; Mariana L Henry; Albert J Sinusas
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-15

4.  Predicting post-contrast information from contrast agent free cardiac MRI using machine learning: Challenges and methods.

Authors:  Musa Abdulkareem; Asmaa A Kenawy; Elisa Rauseo; Aaron M Lee; Alireza Sojoudi; Alborz Amir-Khalili; Karim Lekadir; Alistair A Young; Michael R Barnes; Philipp Barckow; Mohammed Y Khanji; Nay Aung; Steffen E Petersen
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.