BACKGROUND: There is a major unmet need to identify high-risk patients in myocarditis. Although decreasing cardiac and inflammatory markers are commonly interpreted as resolving myocarditis, this assumption has not been confirmed as of today. We sought to evaluate whether routine laboratory parameters at diagnosis predict dynamic of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) as persistent LGE has been shown to be a risk marker in myocarditis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Myocarditis was diagnosed based on clinical presentation, high-sensitivity troponin T, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, after exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease by angiography. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was repeated at 3 months. LGE extent was analyzed with the software GT Volume. Change in LGE >20% was considered significant. Investigated cardiac and inflammatory markers included high-sensitivity troponin T, creatine kinase, myoglobin, N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, and leukocyte count. Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Absolute levels of cardiac enzymes and inflammatory markers at baseline did not predict change in LGE at 3 months. Cardiac and inflammatory markers had normalized in 21 patients (88%). LGE significantly improved in 16 patients (67%); however, it persisted to a lesser degree in 17 of them (71%) and increased in a small percentage (21%) despite normalization of cardiac enzymes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study reporting that cardiac enzymes and inflammatory parameters do not sufficiently reflect LGE in myocarditis. Although a majority of patients with normalizing laboratory markers experienced improved LGE, in a small percentage LGE worsened. These data suggest that cardiac magnetic resonance imaging might add value to currently existing diagnostic tools for risk assessment in myocarditis.
BACKGROUND: There is a major unmet need to identify high-risk patients in myocarditis. Although decreasing cardiac and inflammatory markers are commonly interpreted as resolving myocarditis, this assumption has not been confirmed as of today. We sought to evaluate whether routine laboratory parameters at diagnosis predict dynamic of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) as persistent LGE has been shown to be a risk marker in myocarditis. METHODS AND RESULTS:Myocarditis was diagnosed based on clinical presentation, high-sensitivity troponin T, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, after exclusion of obstructive coronary artery disease by angiography. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was repeated at 3 months. LGE extent was analyzed with the software GT Volume. Change in LGE >20% was considered significant. Investigated cardiac and inflammatory markers included high-sensitivity troponin T, creatine kinase, myoglobin, N-terminal B-type natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, and leukocyte count. Twenty-four patients were enrolled. Absolute levels of cardiac enzymes and inflammatory markers at baseline did not predict change in LGE at 3 months. Cardiac and inflammatory markers had normalized in 21 patients (88%). LGE significantly improved in 16 patients (67%); however, it persisted to a lesser degree in 17 of them (71%) and increased in a small percentage (21%) despite normalization of cardiac enzymes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study reporting that cardiac enzymes and inflammatory parameters do not sufficiently reflect LGE in myocarditis. Although a majority of patients with normalizing laboratory markers experienced improved LGE, in a small percentage LGE worsened. These data suggest that cardiac magnetic resonance imaging might add value to currently existing diagnostic tools for risk assessment in myocarditis.
Authors: Tommaso Di Noto; Jochen von Spiczak; Manoj Mannil; Elena Gantert; Paolo Soda; Robert Manka; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging Date: 2019-12-19
Authors: Jan Berg; Marina Lovrinovic; Nora Baltensperger; Christine K Kissel; Jan Kottwitz; Robert Manka; Dimitri Patriki; Frank Scherff; Christian Schmied; Ulf Landmesser; Thomas F Lüscher; Bettina Heidecker Journal: Open Heart Date: 2019-04-23
Authors: Jan Kottwitz; Katelyn A Bruno; Jan Berg; Gary R Salomon; DeLisa Fairweather; Mawahib Elhassan; Nora Baltensperger; Christine K Kissel; Marina Lovrinovic; Andrea Baltensweiler; Christian Schmied; Christian Templin; Joao A C Lima; Ulf Landmesser; Thomas F Lüscher; Robert Manka; Bettina Heidecker Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2020-01-31 Impact factor: 3.216
Authors: James McKinney; Kim A Connelly; Paul Dorian; Anne Fournier; Jack M Goodman; Nicholas Grubic; Saul Isserow; Nathaniel Moulson; François Philippon; Andrew Pipe; Paul Poirier; Taryn Taylor; Jane Thornton; Mike Wilkinson; Amer M Johri Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Carsten Tschöpe; Enrico Ammirati; Biykem Bozkurt; Alida L P Caforio; Leslie T Cooper; Stephan B Felix; Joshua M Hare; Bettina Heidecker; Stephane Heymans; Norbert Hübner; Sebastian Kelle; Karin Klingel; Henrike Maatz; Abdul S Parwani; Frank Spillmann; Randall C Starling; Hiroyuki Tsutsui; Petar Seferovic; Sophie Van Linthout Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2020-10-12 Impact factor: 49.421
Authors: M Polacin; I Kapos; M Gastl; C Blüthgen; M Karolyi; J von Spiczak; M Eberhard; B Baessler; H Alkadhi; S Kozerke; R Manka Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2020-08-13 Impact factor: 2.357