BACKGROUND: To evaluate the relative and absolute reliability of reaction time measuring methods during different conditions in participants with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). METHODS: 30 patients with PFPS and 30 healthy controls were recruited in the present study. The upper extremity reaction time, upper extremity error rate, involved and non-involved lower extremity braking reaction times, and involved and non-involved knee extension reaction times were measured. Each condition was repeated three times, 2 sessions with a 5-7 days interval. The intra-session reliability was evaluated in three-trial (A), second- and third-trial (B) modes. In addition, the inter-session reliability was evaluated in mode A, mode B, and best score (C) mode. RESULTS: The result of inter-session reliability of mode A showed that all measurements except upper extremity reaction time in PFPS group showed high to very high relative reliability (ICC: 0.74-0.94). In mode B, all measurements except non-involved knee extension reaction time in PFPS group showed high to very high relative reliability (ICC: 0.71-0.93). In mode C, all measurements showed high to very high relative reliability (ICC: 0.70-0.94) except upper extremity error rate and non-involved knee extension reaction time in PFPS group. The result of intra-session reliability showed that all measurements had high to very high relative reliability (ICC: 0.78-0.94) in mode A. In mode B, all measurements showed high to very high relative reliability (0.78-0.94). CONCLUSION: The braking time seems more reliable than other reaction time tasks. In addition, the results showed that mode A is more reliable than other modes. The newly designed package is a reliable tool to measure the knee extension reaction time in patients with knee musculoskeletal disorders.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the relative and absolute reliability of reaction time measuring methods during different conditions in participants with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). METHODS: 30 patients with PFPS and 30 healthy controls were recruited in the present study. The upper extremity reaction time, upper extremity error rate, involved and non-involved lower extremity braking reaction times, and involved and non-involved knee extension reaction times were measured. Each condition was repeated three times, 2 sessions with a 5-7 days interval. The intra-session reliability was evaluated in three-trial (A), second- and third-trial (B) modes. In addition, the inter-session reliability was evaluated in mode A, mode B, and best score (C) mode. RESULTS: The result of inter-session reliability of mode A showed that all measurements except upper extremity reaction time in PFPS group showed high to very high relative reliability (ICC: 0.74-0.94). In mode B, all measurements except non-involved knee extension reaction time in PFPS group showed high to very high relative reliability (ICC: 0.71-0.93). In mode C, all measurements showed high to very high relative reliability (ICC: 0.70-0.94) except upper extremity error rate and non-involved knee extension reaction time in PFPS group. The result of intra-session reliability showed that all measurements had high to very high relative reliability (ICC: 0.78-0.94) in mode A. In mode B, all measurements showed high to very high relative reliability (0.78-0.94). CONCLUSION: The braking time seems more reliable than other reaction time tasks. In addition, the results showed that mode A is more reliable than other modes. The newly designed package is a reliable tool to measure the knee extension reaction time in patients with knee musculoskeletal disorders.
Authors: Kelsey Picha; Carolina Quintana; Amanda Glueck; Matt Hoch; Nicholas R Heebner; John P Abt Journal: J Sport Rehabil Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 1.931
Authors: Michelle C Boling; Darin A Padua; Stephen W Marshall; Kevin Guskiewicz; Scott Pyne; Anthony Beutler Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2009-09-24 Impact factor: 6.202