Yi-Wei Li1,2, Yi-Ping He2,3, Fang-Qi Liu1,2, Jun-Jie Peng1,2, San-Jun Cai1,2, Ye Xu1,2, Ming-He Wang1,2. 1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. 2. Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. 3. Department of Endoscopy, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To compare clinicopathologic feature of rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) grade G1 with G2 NET. METHODS: Six hundred-one cases of rectal G1 and G2 NETs diagnosed in our center were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 601 cases of rectal NET, 515 cases were with grade G1 and 86 cases were with grade G2. Median tumor size was 0.7 cm. Compared with G1 NET, G2 tumors were with significantly larger tumor size (0.8 vs 2.2 cm, p < 0.001), less percentages of patients with tumors confined to submucosa (92.6 vs 42.8%, p < 0.001), more frequent presence of microvascular invasion (MVI) (3.6 vs 16.9%, p < 0.001) or peri-neural invasion (PNI) (2.0 vs 24.1%, p < 0.001). Incidence of lymph node and distant metastasis was 5.2 and 2.1% in G1 NET compared with 44.2 and 31.4% in G2 tumor, respectively (p < 0.001). For tumors sized 1-2 cm and confined to submucosa, incidence of lymph node metastasis was 6.1% for G1 NET compared with 21.1% for G2 NET. Status of MVI/PNI was predictive of lymph node metastasis for G2 tumor rather than G1 NET in this subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal G2 NET was much more invasive with significantly elevated prevalence of lymph node metastasis compared with G1 tumor.
BACKGROUND: To compare clinicopathologic feature of rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) grade G1 with G2 NET. METHODS: Six hundred-one cases of rectal G1 and G2 NETs diagnosed in our center were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 601 cases of rectal NET, 515 cases were with grade G1 and 86 cases were with grade G2. Median tumor size was 0.7 cm. Compared with G1 NET, G2 tumors were with significantly larger tumor size (0.8 vs 2.2 cm, p < 0.001), less percentages of patients with tumors confined to submucosa (92.6 vs 42.8%, p < 0.001), more frequent presence of microvascular invasion (MVI) (3.6 vs 16.9%, p < 0.001) or peri-neural invasion (PNI) (2.0 vs 24.1%, p < 0.001). Incidence of lymph node and distant metastasis was 5.2 and 2.1% in G1 NET compared with 44.2 and 31.4% in G2 tumor, respectively (p < 0.001). For tumors sized 1-2 cm and confined to submucosa, incidence of lymph node metastasis was 6.1% for G1 NET compared with 21.1% for G2 NET. Status of MVI/PNI was predictive of lymph node metastasis for G2 tumor rather than G1 NET in this subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal G2 NET was much more invasive with significantly elevated prevalence of lymph node metastasis compared with G1 tumor.
Authors: Martyn Caplin; Anders Sundin; Ola Nillson; Richard P Baum; Klaus J Klose; Fahrettin Kelestimur; Ursula Plöckinger; Mauro Papotti; Ramon Salazar; Andreas Pascher Journal: Neuroendocrinology Date: 2012 Impact factor: 4.914
Authors: Ian W Folkert; Andrew J Sinnamon; Seth J Concors; Bonita J Bennett; Douglas L Fraker; Najjia N Mahmoud; David C Metz; Kristen M Stashek; Robert E Roses Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: James C Yao; Manal Hassan; Alexandria Phan; Cecile Dagohoy; Colleen Leary; Jeannette E Mares; Eddie K Abdalla; Jason B Fleming; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Asif Rashid; Douglas B Evans Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John K Ramage; A Ahmed; J Ardill; N Bax; D J Breen; M E Caplin; P Corrie; J Davar; A H Davies; V Lewington; T Meyer; J Newell-Price; G Poston; N Reed; A Rockall; W Steward; R V Thakker; C Toubanakis; J Valle; C Verbeke; A B Grossman Journal: Gut Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 23.059