BACKGROUND: Colorectal carcinoids are often described as low-grade malignant. However, no study has compared the survival between patients with colorectal carcinoids and those with carcinomas, in a large series. In addition, no global consensus has been established on the crucial determinants of metastasis in colorectal carcinoids. AIM: To determine the predictive factors for metastasis in colorectal carcinoids and clarify their prognosis compared with adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Data of all patients diagnosed as having colorectal carcinoids were extracted from a large nationwide database of colorectal tumours, the Multi-Institutional Registry of Large-Bowel Cancer in Japan, for the period from 1984 to 1998. Risk factors for lymph node (LN) metastases and distant metastases were analysed among those who were undergoing surgery, by univariate and multivariate analysis. Cancer-specific survival was also compared between patients with colorectal carcinoids and those with adenocarcinomas registered in the same period. RESULTS: Among the 90 057 cases of colorectal tumours that were diagnosed, a total of 345 cases of carcinoids were identified, including 247 colorectal carcinoids of those undergoing surgery. Risk factors for LN metastasis were tumour size >/=11 mm and lymphatic invasion, whereas those for distant metastasis were tumour size >/=21 mm and venous invasion. Colorectal carcinoids without these risk factors exhibited no LN metastasis or distant metastasis. Cancer-specific survival of patients with colorectal carcinoids without metastasis was better than that of those with adenocarcinomas. However, the survival was similar between carcinoids and adenocarcinomas if the tumours had LN metastasis or distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of metastasis in colorectal carcinoids could lead to survival that is as poor as in adenocarcinomas. Tumours </=10 mm and without lymphatic invasion could be curatively treated by local resection, but others would need radical LN dissection.
BACKGROUND:Colorectal carcinoids are often described as low-grade malignant. However, no study has compared the survival between patients with colorectal carcinoids and those with carcinomas, in a large series. In addition, no global consensus has been established on the crucial determinants of metastasis in colorectal carcinoids. AIM: To determine the predictive factors for metastasis in colorectal carcinoids and clarify their prognosis compared with adenocarcinomas. METHODS: Data of all patients diagnosed as having colorectal carcinoids were extracted from a large nationwide database of colorectal tumours, the Multi-Institutional Registry of Large-Bowel Cancer in Japan, for the period from 1984 to 1998. Risk factors for lymph node (LN) metastases and distant metastases were analysed among those who were undergoing surgery, by univariate and multivariate analysis. Cancer-specific survival was also compared between patients with colorectal carcinoids and those with adenocarcinomas registered in the same period. RESULTS: Among the 90 057 cases of colorectal tumours that were diagnosed, a total of 345 cases of carcinoids were identified, including 247 colorectal carcinoids of those undergoing surgery. Risk factors for LN metastasis were tumour size >/=11 mm and lymphatic invasion, whereas those for distant metastasis were tumour size >/=21 mm and venous invasion. Colorectal carcinoids without these risk factors exhibited no LN metastasis or distant metastasis. Cancer-specific survival of patients with colorectal carcinoids without metastasis was better than that of those with adenocarcinomas. However, the survival was similar between carcinoids and adenocarcinomas if the tumours had LN metastasis or distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of metastasis in colorectal carcinoids could lead to survival that is as poor as in adenocarcinomas. Tumours </=10 mm and without lymphatic invasion could be curatively treated by local resection, but others would need radical LN dissection.
Authors: Sandeepa Musunuru; Herbert Chen; Sharad Rajpal; Nicholas Stephani; John C McDermott; Kyle Holen; Layton F Rikkers; Sharon M Weber Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2006-10
Authors: Juan M Sarmiento; Glenroy Heywood; Joseph Rubin; Duane M Ilstrup; David M Nagorney; Florencia G Que Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: E Bajetta; L Ferrari; G Procopio; L Catena; E Ferrario; A Martinetti; M Di Bartolomeo; R Buzzoni; L Celio; M Vitali; E Beretta; E Seregni; E Bombardieri Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Jun Heo; Seong Woo Jeon; Min Kyu Jung; Sung Kook Kim; Geun Young Shin; Sang Man Park; Sun Young Ahn; Won Kyung Yoon; Min Kim; Yong Hwan Kwon Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Dong Hyun Kim; Jin Ha Lee; Yoon Jin Cha; Soo Jung Park; Jae Hee Cheon; Tae Il Kim; Hoguen Kim; Won Ho Kim; Sung Pil Hong Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 3.199