Khizr A Nawab1,2, Benjamin C Storey1, Natalie Staplin2,3,4, Rosemary Walmsley2, Richard Haynes1,3,4, Sheera Sutherland1, Sarah Crosbie1, Christopher W Pugh1,5, Charlie H S Harper2,3, Martin J Landray2,3,4,6, Aiden Doherty2,6, William G Herrington1,3,4. 1. Oxford Kidney Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK. 2. Big Data Institute, Li Ka Shing Centre for Health Information and Discovery, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 3. Medical Research Council Population Health Research Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health (NDPH), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 4. Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 5. Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. 6. National Institute of Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The feasibility of wrist-worn accelerometers, and the patterns and determinants of physical activity, among people on dialysis are uncertain. METHODS: People on maintenance dialysis were fitted with a wrist-worn AxivityAX3 accelerometer. Subsets also wore a 14-day electrocardiograph patch (Zio®PatchXT) and wearable cameras. Age-, sex- and season-matched UK Biobank control groups were derived for comparison. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) accelerometer wear time for the 101 recruits was 12.5 (10.4-13.5) days, of which 73 participants (mean age 66.5 years) had excellent wear on both dialysis and non-dialysis days. Mean (standard error) overall physical activity levels were 15.5 (0.7) milligravity units (mg), 14.8 (0.7) mg on dialysis days versus 16.2 (0.8) mg on non-dialysis days. This compared with 28.1 (0.5) mg for apparently healthy controls, 23.4 (0.4) mg for controls with prior cardiovascular disease (CVD) and/or diabetes mellitus and 22.9 (0.6) mg for heart failure controls. Each day, we estimated that those on dialysis spent an average of about 1 hour (h/day) walking, 0.6 h/day engaging in moderate-intensity activity, 0.7 h/day on light tasks, 13.2 h/day sedentary and 8.6 h/day asleep. Older age and self-reported leg weakness were associated with decreased levels of physical activity, but the presence of prior CVD, arrhythmias and listing for transplantation were not. CONCLUSIONS: Wrist-worn accelerometers are an acceptable and reliable method to measure physical activity in people on dialysis and may also be used to estimate functional behaviours. Among people on dialysis, who are broadly half as active as general population controls, age and leg weakness appear to be more important determinants of low activity levels than CVD.
BACKGROUND: The feasibility of wrist-worn accelerometers, and the patterns and determinants of physical activity, among people on dialysis are uncertain. METHODS: People on maintenance dialysis were fitted with a wrist-worn AxivityAX3 accelerometer. Subsets also wore a 14-day electrocardiograph patch (Zio®PatchXT) and wearable cameras. Age-, sex- and season-matched UK Biobank control groups were derived for comparison. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) accelerometer wear time for the 101 recruits was 12.5 (10.4-13.5) days, of which 73 participants (mean age 66.5 years) had excellent wear on both dialysis and non-dialysis days. Mean (standard error) overall physical activity levels were 15.5 (0.7) milligravity units (mg), 14.8 (0.7) mg on dialysis days versus 16.2 (0.8) mg on non-dialysis days. This compared with 28.1 (0.5) mg for apparently healthy controls, 23.4 (0.4) mg for controls with prior cardiovascular disease (CVD) and/or diabetes mellitus and 22.9 (0.6) mg for heart failure controls. Each day, we estimated that those on dialysis spent an average of about 1 hour (h/day) walking, 0.6 h/day engaging in moderate-intensity activity, 0.7 h/day on light tasks, 13.2 h/day sedentary and 8.6 h/day asleep. Older age and self-reported leg weakness were associated with decreased levels of physical activity, but the presence of prior CVD, arrhythmias and listing for transplantation were not. CONCLUSIONS: Wrist-worn accelerometers are an acceptable and reliable method to measure physical activity in people on dialysis and may also be used to estimate functional behaviours. Among people on dialysis, who are broadly half as active as general population controls, age and leg weakness appear to be more important determinants of low activity levels than CVD.
Authors: Colleen F McKenna; Amadeo F Salvador; Floris K Hendriks; Alana P Y Harris; Luc J C van Loon; Nicholas A Burd Journal: Semin Dial Date: 2019-03-22 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: K L Johansen; G M Chertow; A V Ng; K Mulligan; S Carey; P Y Schoenfeld; J A Kent-Braun Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: João L Viana; Pedro Martins; Kristen Parker; Magdalena Madero; Héctor Pérez Grovas; Kirsten Anding; Stefan Degenhardt; Iwona Gabrys; Shauna Raugust; Christina West; Theresa E Cowan; Kenneth R Wilund Journal: Semin Dial Date: 2019-05-13 Impact factor: 3.455