| Literature DB >> 33773637 |
Matthew Traylor1, Elodie Persyn2, Liisa Tomppo3, Sofia Klasson4, Vida Abedi5, Mark K Bakker6, Nuria Torres7, Linxin Li8, Steven Bell9, Loes Rutten-Jacobs10, Daniel J Tozer9, Christoph J Griessenauer11, Yanfei Zhang12, Annie Pedersen4, Pankaj Sharma13, Jordi Jimenez-Conde14, Tatjana Rundek15, Raji P Grewal16, Arne Lindgren17, James F Meschia18, Veikko Salomaa19, Aki Havulinna20, Christina Kourkoulis21, Katherine Crawford22, Sandro Marini22, Braxton D Mitchell23, Steven J Kittner24, Jonathan Rosand25, Martin Dichgans26, Christina Jern4, Daniel Strbian27, Israel Fernandez-Cadenas28, Ramin Zand29, Ynte Ruigrok6, Natalia Rost30, Robin Lemmens31, Peter M Rothwell8, Christopher D Anderson25, Joanna Wardlaw32, Cathryn M Lewis33, Hugh S Markus34.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The genetic basis of lacunar stroke is poorly understood, with a single locus on 16q24 identified to date. We sought to identify novel associations and provide mechanistic insights into the disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33773637 PMCID: PMC8062914 DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00031-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lancet Neurol ISSN: 1474-4422 Impact factor: 59.935
Figure 1Analysis pipeline
GWAS=genome-wide association study.
Genome-wide significant loci for lacunar stroke in univariate or multi-trait analysis
| OR (SE) | p value | Studies | OR (SE) | p value | β (SE) | p value | p value | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 203 968 973 | Intronic | rs72934535 | T/C | 0·89 | 1·25 (0·04) | 3·7 × 10−9 | 12 | 1·22 (0·04) | 5·2 × 10−8 | 0·070 (0·01) | 2·8 × 10−10 | 5·3 × 10−16 | |
| 3 | 41 839 370 | Intronic | rs4621303 | T/A | 0·83 | 1·15 (0·03) | 1·7 × 10−7 | 14 | 1·16 (0·03) | 6·4 × 10−9 | 0·015 (0·01) | 0·12 | 2·2 × 10−7 | |
| 11 | 47 434 986 | Exonic | rs2293576 | G/A | 0·67 | 1·14 (0·02) | 7·2 × 10−10 | 14 | 1·14 (0·02) | 6·0 × 10−10 | 0·030 (0·01) | 3·1 × 10−5 | 6·4 × 10−13 | |
| 16 | 87 575 332 | Intergenic | rs12445022 | A/G | 0·34 | 1·13 (0·02) | 2·5 × 10−8 | 13 | 1·12 (0·02) | 9·0 × 10−8 | 0·019 (0·01) | 0·0078 | 3·1 × 10−9 | |
| 18 | 5 389 832 | Intergenic | rs9958650 | G/A | 0·10 | 1·18 (0·03) | 9·9 × 10−7 | 12 | 1·19 (0·03) | 2·4 × 10−8 | -0·011 (0·01) | 0·33 | 0·0005 | |
| 1 | 156 197 380 | Intronic | rs2984613 | C/T | 0·64 | 1·10 (0·02) | 2·5 × 10−5 | 13 | 1·09 (0·02) | 1·4 × 10−5 | 0·037 (0·01) | 2·3 × 10−7 | 8·2 × 10−10 | |
| LOX-ZNF474-LOC100505841 | 5 | 121 518 378 | Downstream | rs2303655 | T/C | 0·81 | 1·14 (0·03) | 3·6 × 10−5 | 11 | 1·12 (0·03) | 0·00014 | 0·050 (0·01) | 1·4 × 10−8 | 1·9 × 10−10 |
| 6 | 1 366 718 | Intergenic | rs7766042 | C/T | 0·11 | 1·17 (0·03) | 3·7 × 10−6 | 11 | 1·18 (0·03) | 1·2 × 10−6 | 0·045 (0·01) | 7·1 × 10−5 | 5·2 × 10−9 | |
| 6 | 142 562 417 | Intergenic | rs225744 | C/T | 0·77 | 1·11 (0·03) | 3·5 × 10−5 | 12 | 1·09 (0·02) | 0·00050 | 0·037 (0·01) | 5·8 × 10−6 | 9·2 × 10−9 | |
| 10 | 105 447 838 | Intronic | rs61000833 | T/C | 0·60 | 1·10 (0·02) | 1·7 × 10−5 | 12 | 1·07 (0·02) | 0·0024 | 0·049 (0·01) | 2·0 × 10−12 | 6·0 × 10−13 | |
| HTRA1-ARMS2 | 10 | 124 233 181 | Intronic | rs79043147 | T/C | 0·07 | 1·21 (0·04) | 3·2 × 10−6 | 11 | 1·22 (0·04) | 1·1 × 10−6 | 0·057 (0·01) | 1·8 × 10−5 | 1·6 × 10−9 |
| 13 | 111 040 681 | Intronic | rs11838776 | A/G | 0·29 | 1·11 (0·02) | 4·3 × 10−6 | 12 | 1·11 (0·02) | 1·6 × 10−6 | 0·050 (0·01) | 7·9 × 10−11 | 7·9 × 10−13 | |
RA=risk allele. OA=other allele. RAF=risk allele frequency. MTAG=multi-trait analysis of genome-wide association study. SNP=single nucleotide polymorphism.
Positions based on reference genome hg19.
ICA1L, CARF, NBEAL1, ULK4, and SLC25A44 were associated in TWAS analysis and confirmed by colocalization.
Because A→T and C→G SNPs are removed by MTAG, results are presented for the SNP in highest linkage disequilibrium (rs9842261).
Figure 2Manhattan plot of genome-wide SNP associations by genomic position
(A) Lacunar stroke transethnic analysis. (B) Lacunar stroke multi-trait analysis. SNP=single nucleotide polymorphism. Dashed lines indicate the genome-wide significance threshold of 5 × 10−8.
Figure 3Genes for which expression is associated with lacunar stroke in six tissues from transcriptome-wide association analysis
Evidence of colocalisation of gene expression and lacunar stroke signals is shown by triangle size, with larger triangles indicating stronger evidence of colocalisation. CMC=CommonMind Consortium. COLOC.PP4=posterior probability of hypothesis 4 in colocalisation analysis (that there is a consistent association between lacunar stroke and expression of the given gene). GTEx=Genotype-Tissue Expression portal. WMH=white matter hyperintensities. YFS=Young Finns Study.
Figure 4Associations between genetically proxied cardiovascular risk factors and lacunar stroke from mendelian randomisation analysis using the inverse variance weighted method
Estimates are presented as ORs per genetically proxied increase in each risk factor (original scale). OR=odds ratio.