Literature DB >> 33772604

The state of TURP through a historical lens.

Räto T Strebel1, Steven A Kaplan2.   

Abstract

In 1926 Maximilian Stern introduced a new instrument to treat obstructions at the vesical orifice and baptized it resectoscope. With reference to astonishing historical statements about the new instrument and surgical technique made by the pioneers and their critics we will value why transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the gold standard for most men suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic enlargement. TURP is currently challenged by recently introduced new instruments and techniques claiming advantages over TURP. However, TURP offers an excellent balance between high efficacy in symptom relieve and low morbidity along with low costs and favorable long term outcome compared to other treatment options. We will outline these arguments demonstrating that even after a century has elapsed, since its introduction into the urologists armamentarium, TURP continues to stand the passage of time.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  LUTS; Prostatic hyperplasia; Transurethral resection of prostate

Year:  2021        PMID: 33772604     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03607-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  8 in total

1.  [A study of 4,031 patients of transurethral resection of the prostate performed by one surgeon: learning curve, surgical results and postoperative complications].

Authors:  Seiji Furuya; Ryoji Furuya; Hiroshi Ogura; Tohru Araki; Toshihiko Arita
Journal:  Hinyokika Kiyo       Date:  2006-08

2.  Cysto-Urethroscopic Resection of the Prostate.

Authors:  H W Martin
Journal:  Cal West Med       Date:  1932-02

3.  How I do it: Same day discharge for transurethral resection of prostate using Olympus PlasmaButton and PlasmaLoop.

Authors:  Ryan Pham; Jacob Parke; Kenneth M Kernen
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.344

4.  TUR-P phantom for resident surgical training: food-based design as a human mimicking model of the prostate.

Authors:  Nur Rasyid; Harun Wijanarko Kusumo Putra; Ponco Birowo; Irfan Wahyudi; Chaidir Arif Mochtar; Agus Rizal A H Hamid
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Design, implementation, and evaluation of a novel curriculum to teach transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a 3-year experience of urology simulation bootcamp course.

Authors:  Mithun Kailavasan; Christopher Berridge; Grigorios Athanasiadis; Agapios Gkentzis; Bhavan Rai; Sunjay Jain; Chandra S Biyani; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Bipolar vs. monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction: A Cochrane review.

Authors:  Cameron Edwin Alexander; Malo M F Scullion; Muhammad Imran Omar; Yuhong Yuan; Charalampos Mamoulakis; James M O N'Dow; Changhao Chen; Thomas B L Lam
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Complications after surgery for benign prostatic enlargement: a population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Rano Matta; Erind Dvorani; Christopher Wallis; Amanda Hird; Joseph LaBossiere; Girish Kulkarni; Ronald Kodama; Lesley Carr; Sidney B Radomski; Refik Saskin; Sender Herschorn; Robert K Nam
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  TURPxit or not: contemporary management options for benign prostatic obstruction.

Authors:  Thomas R W Herrmann; Vincent Misrai; Fernando Gómez Sancha; Thorsten Bach
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 4.226

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.