Literature DB >> 32569563

Bipolar vs. monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction: A Cochrane review.

Cameron Edwin Alexander1, Malo M F Scullion1, Muhammad Imran Omar2, Yuhong Yuan3, Charalampos Mamoulakis4, James M O N'Dow5, Changhao Chen6, Thomas B L Lam1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There remains uncertainty regarding the differences in patient outcomes between monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (MTURP) and bipolar TURP (BTURP) in the management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO).
METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out up to March 19, 2019. Methods in the Cochrane Handbook were followed. Certainty of evidence (CoE) was assessed using the GRADE approach.
RESULTS: A total of 59 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 8924 participants were included. BTURP probably results in little to no difference in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at 12 months (MD -0.24, 95% confidence internal [CI] -0.39--0.09; participants=2531; RCTs=16; moderate CoE) or health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at 12 months (MD -0.12, 95% CI -0.25-0.02; participants=2004, RCTs=11; moderate CoE), compared to MTURP. BTURP probably reduces TUR syndrome (relative risk [RR] 0.17, 95% CI 0.09-0.30; participants=6,745, RCTs=44; moderate CoE) and blood transfusions (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30-0.59; participants=5727, RCTs=38; moderate CoE), compared to MTURP. BTURP may carry similar risk of urinary incontinence at 12 months (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.01-4.06; participants=751; RCTs=4; low CoE), re-TURP (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.44-2.40; participants=652, RCTs=6, I2=0%; low CoE) and erectile dysfunction (International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5]) at 12 months (MD 0.88, 95% CI -0.56-2.32; RCTs=3; moderate CoE), compared to MTURP.
CONCLUSIONS: BTURP and MTURP probably improve urological symptoms to a similar degree. BTURP probably reduces TUR syndrome and blood transfusion slightly postoperatively. The moderate certainty of evidence available for primary outcomes suggests no need for further RCTs comparing BTURP and MTURP.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32569563     DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  3 in total

1.  The state of TURP through a historical lens.

Authors:  Räto T Strebel; Steven A Kaplan
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Comparison between thulium laser vapoenucleation and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in men aged 75 years and older in a real-life setting: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Daniele Castellani; Mirko Di Rosa; Gianna Pace; Emanuele Rubilotta; Marilena Gubbiotti; Giacomo Maria Pirola; Luca Gasparri; Alessandro Antonelli; Marco Dellabella
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Short-term efficacy and safety of second generation bipolar transurethral vaporization of the prostate (B-TUVP) for large benign prostate enlargement: Results from a retrospective feasibility study.

Authors:  Takeshi Fukazawa; Hiroki Ito; Masato Takanashi; Risa Shinoki; Tadashi Tabei; Takashi Kawahara; Francis X Keeley; Marcus J Drake; Kazuki Kobayashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.