Literature DB >> 33772447

Perceptual timing precision with vibrotactile, auditory, and multisensory stimuli.

Mercedes B Villalonga1, Rachel F Sussman2, Robert Sekuler3.   

Abstract

The growing use of vibrotactile signaling devices makes it important to understand the perceptual limits on vibrotactile information processing. To promote that understanding, we carried out a pair of experiments on vibrotactile, auditory, and bimodal (synchronous vibrotactile and auditory) temporal acuity. On each trial, subjects experienced a set of isochronous, standard intervals (400 ms each), followed by one interval of variable duration (400 ± 1-80 ms). Intervals were demarcated by short vibrotactile, auditory, or bimodal pulses. Subjects categorized the timing of the last interval by describing the final pulse as either "early" or "late" relative to its predecessors. In Experiment 1, each trial contained three isochronous standard intervals, followed by an interval of variable length. In Experiment 2, the number of isochronous standard intervals per trial varied, from one to four. Psychometric modeling revealed that vibrotactile stimulation produced poorer temporal discrimination than either auditory or bimodal stimulation. Moreover, auditory signals dominated bimodal sensitivity, and inter-individual differences in temporal discriminability were reduced with bimodal stimulation. Additionally, varying the number of isochronous intervals in a trial failed to improve temporal sensitivity in either modality, suggesting that memory played a key role in judgments of interval duration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory perception; Individual differences; Memory; Multisensory perception; Temporal sensitivity; Timing; Vibrotactile perception

Year:  2021        PMID: 33772447     DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02254-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 1943-3921            Impact factor:   2.199


  33 in total

1.  Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation.

Authors:  M HERSHENSON
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1962-03

2.  Interactions between working memory and visual perception: an ERP/EEG study.

Authors:  Yigal Agam; Robert Sekuler
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Good vibrations: human interval timing in the vibrotactile modality.

Authors:  Luke A Jones; Ellen Poliakoff; Jill Wells
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Martin S Banks
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Duration discrimination in crossmodal sequences.

Authors:  Simon Grondin; Devin McAuley
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration.

Authors:  David Burr; Martin S Banks; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

8.  A critical band filter in touch.

Authors:  J C Makous; R M Friedman; C J Vierck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Duration perception in crossmodally-defined intervals.

Authors:  Katja M Mayer; Massimiliano Di Luca; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-08-15

Review 10.  Visual cognition.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.