Literature DB >> 33771577

How do patient-reported outcomes compare with clinician assessments? A prospective study of radiation dermatitis in breast cancer.

Tara Behroozian1, Lauren Milton1, Liying Zhang2, Julia Lou2, Irene Karam1, Emily Lam1, Gina Wong1, Ewa Szumacher1, Edward Chow3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Breast cancer patients frequently develop radiation dermatitis (RD) when undergoing post-operative radiation therapy (RT). Traditional RD assessment methods measure clinician-reported outcomes (CROs), but patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have gained recent popularity. The purpose of this prospective analysis was to compare PROs with CROs of breast RD.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Demographic and treatment characteristics were prospectively collected for patients receiving post-operative RT between February 2018 to September 2020. Patients and clinicians completed a skin symptom assessment at baseline, weekly during RT, and at a one- to three-month follow-up visit. Skin treatments used by patients were collected. Concordance between each PRO and CRO was determined using percent concordance and concordance index (C-statistic) by logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: A total of 777 patients were included in the present study. All skin symptom assessment items were significantly underreported by clinicians in comparison to patients (p < 0.0001), with a low to moderate level of concordance (C-statistic range: 0.58-0.70; percent concordance range: 29-50%). The majority of patients used moisturizing creams as a prophylactic measure (65.1%), as per institutional guidelines.
CONCLUSION: There were significant discrepancies between PROs and CROs when assessing breast RD. CROs alone are insufficient in measuring RD as they fail to capture the impact on patient quality of life. The study findings highlight the need for improved RD symptom assessment and support the development of a new tool with both patient and clinician components.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Clinician reported outcomes; Patient reported outcomes; Radiation dermatitis; Radiotherapy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33771577     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.03.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  4 in total

1.  Patient-centered dosing: oncologists' perspectives about treatment-related side effects and individualized dosing for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).

Authors:  Anne L Loeser; Lucy Gao; Aditya Bardia; Mark E Burkard; Kevin M Kalinsky; Jeffrey Peppercorn; Hope S Rugo; Martha Carlson; Janice Cowden; Lesley Glenn; Julia Maues; Sheila McGlown; Andy Ni; Natalia Padron; Maryam Lustberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 4.624

2.  Prevention of Radiodermatitis With Topical Chinese Herbal Medicine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Bo Yu; Bao-Jin Han; Hui-Juan Cao
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.988

3.  Validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Moist Desquamation among Breast Radiotherapy Patients.

Authors:  Cheryl Duzenli; Elisa K Chan; Theodora Koulis; Sheri Grahame; Joel Singer; David Morris; Josslynn Spence; Terry Lee; Levi Burns; Robert A Olson
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 4.  Promoting Comfort: A Clinician Guide and Evidence-Based Skin Care Plan in the Prevention and Management of Radiation Dermatitis for Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Deborah Witt Sherman; Sandra M Walsh
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.