Literature DB >> 33770329

IgA Deficiency Is Not Systematically Ruled Out in Patients Undergoing Celiac Disease Testing.

Ezequiel Nazario1, Juan Lasa2, Amalia Schill3, Belen Duarte1, Diego Berardi1, Silvina Paz1, Alexis Muryan3, Ignacio Zubiaurre1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for celiac disease (CD) testing recommend total serum IgA determination alongside anti-transglutaminase IgA antibodies. It is not well known if lack of serum IgA determination is a common finding in clinical practice. AIM: To determine the prevalence of lack of serum IgA determination among patients screened for celiac disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified all subjects who underwent serum anti-transglutaminase IgA and/or other CD-related antibodies determination at a single teaching hospital in Buenos Aires from October 2019 to February 2020. Medical records were reviewed to select adult patients who were tested for celiac disease. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with inadequate testing for celiac disease due to lack of serum IgA determination. We retrieved the following variables from each patient's record: age, gender, body mass index, symptoms present at screening, first-grade family history of CD, history of type-1 diabetes mellitus, autoimmune hypothyroidism, Down's syndrome.
RESULTS: Overall, 1122 patients were included for analysis. Lack of serum IgA determination prevalence was 20.49%. Among patients who did have serum IgA determination, the prevalence of IgA deficiency was 5.16%. The following variables were independently associated with a significantly increased odds of serum IgA determination: diarrhea [OR 1.55 (1.01-2.34)] and abdominal pain [OR 2.28 (1.44-3.63)]; higher body mass index [OR 0.91 (0.85-0.98)], osteoporosis [OR 0.49 (0.28-0.89)], hypothyroidism [OR 0.18 (0.07-0.45)], arthralgia/arthritis [OR 0.47 (0.27-0.85)], or testing by endocrinologist [OR 0.46 (0.23-0.91)] and gynecologist [OR 0.14 (0.06-0.31)] were inversely associated.
CONCLUSION: IgA deficiency is not systematically ruled out in a relatively high proportion of patients undergoing serological screening of celiac disease.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Celiac disease; Immunoglobulin A; Screening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33770329     DOI: 10.1007/s10620-021-06939-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Dis Sci        ISSN: 0163-2116            Impact factor:   3.199


  3 in total

1.  Contemporary practice patterns in the management of newly diagnosed hypertension.

Authors:  F A McAlister; K K Teo; R Z Lewanczuk; G Wells; T J Montague
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Osteoporosis in a north american adult population with celiac disease.

Authors:  D Meyer; S Stavropolous; B Diamond; E Shane; P H Green
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Looking for celiac disease in Italian women with endometriosis: a case control study.

Authors:  Luca Santoro; Sebastiano Campo; Ferruccio D'Onofrio; Antonella Gallo; Marcello Covino; Vincenzo Campo; Guglielmo Palombini; Angelo Santoliquido; Giovanni Gasbarrini; Massimo Montalto
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Role of HLA in the Association between IgA Deficiency and Celiac Disease.

Authors:  Dimitri Poddighe; Cristina Capittini
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.434

Review 2.  Celiac Disease in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis and Other Pediatric Rheumatic Disorders.

Authors:  Dimitri Poddighe; Micol Romano; Kuanysh Dossybayeva; Diyora Abdukhakimova; Dinara Galiyeva; Erkan Demirkaya
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.