Literature DB >> 33770106

Accuracy and reliability of the InBody 270 multi-frequency body composition analyser in 10-12-year-old children.

Malte Nejst Larsen1, Peter Krustrup1,2,3, Susana Cristina Araújo Póvoas1,4, Carlo Castagna5,6.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was at examining the validity and reliability of a marketed bioimpedance (BIA) scale for body composition assessment, in children engaged in an educational football project (FIFA 11 for Health). One-hundred and twenty-seven children (70 boys and 57 girls; age 10.7±0.5 years, body mass 41.2±9.0 kg, Body mass index 18.5±3.3 kg·m-2 and stature 149±7 cm) were evaluated for total body mass, lean body mass, muscle mass, using BIA (InBody 270, Biospace, California, USA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA, Lunar Prodigy, GE Medical Systems, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), at baseline conditions. Data analyses were carried out separately for girls and boys. Nearly perfect associations (r = 0.97-0.99) and excellent absolute (TEM = 0.04-1.9%) and relative (ICC = 0.98-1.00) inter-device reliability were found between DEXA and BIA variables. Fat and lean body mass bias (p < .0001) were practically relevant both for the boys (2.56 and 11.22 kg, respectively) and the girls (2.33 and 10.49 kg, respectively). Muscle mass and body fat were underestimated and overestimated, respectively, for the boys and girls. InBody 270 is a valid BIA system for estimating body composition with an excellent inter-device relative and absolute reliability. However, the remarkable measurements bias of BIA fat and muscle mass values discourage its use for clinical prescription. The BIA body composition biases were sex dependent.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33770106      PMCID: PMC7996997          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  38 in total

1.  The fallacy of using percentage body fat as a measure of adiposity.

Authors:  Tim J Cole; Mary S Fewtrell; Ann Prentice
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 7.045

Review 2.  The Official Positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: acquisition of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition and considerations regarding analysis and repeatability of measures.

Authors:  Thomas N Hangartner; Sarah Warner; Pierre Braillon; Larry Jankowski; John Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  A comparison of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure total and segmental body composition in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Siobhan Leahy; Cian O'Neill; Rhoda Sohun; Philip Jakeman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 4.  The effect of diet or exercise on ectopic adiposity in children and adolescents with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  W Hens; D Vissers; D Hansen; S Peeters; J Gielen; L Van Gaal; J Taeymans
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 9.213

5.  Reliability and Agreement of Various InBody Body Composition Analyzers as Compared to Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in Healthy Men and Women.

Authors:  Cherilyn N McLester; Brett S Nickerson; Brian M Kliszczewicz; John R McLester
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  PSA and body composition by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in NHANES.

Authors:  Jay H Fowke; Charles E Matthews
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.104

7.  Assessing body composition with DXA and bioimpedance: effects of obesity, physical activity, and age.

Authors:  Eszter Völgyi; Frances A Tylavsky; Arja Lyytikäinen; Harri Suominen; Markku Alén; Sulin Cheng
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 5.002

8.  Action Schools! BC: a school-based physical activity intervention designed to decrease cardiovascular disease risk factors in children.

Authors:  Katharine E Reed; Darren E R Warburton; Heather M Macdonald; P J Naylor; Heather A McKay
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Interventions for preventing obesity in children.

Authors:  Tamara Brown; Theresa Hm Moore; Lee Hooper; Yang Gao; Amir Zayegh; Sharea Ijaz; Martha Elwenspoek; Sophie C Foxen; Lucia Magee; Claire O'Malley; Elizabeth Waters; Carolyn D Summerbell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-23

10.  Concordance between muscle mass assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Fanny Buckinx; Jean-Yves Reginster; Nadia Dardenne; Jean-Louis Croisiser; Jean-François Kaux; Charlotte Beaudart; Justine Slomian; Olivier Bruyère
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comparison of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis with DXA in Adolescents with Cystic Fibrosis before and after a Resistance Training Intervention.

Authors:  Clifton J Holmes; Susan B Racette; Leslie Symonds; Ana Maria Arbeláez; Chao Cao; Andrea Granados
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  The effect of high and low velocity-based training on the throwing performance of collegiate handball players.

Authors:  Bassam Abuajwa; Mike Hamlin; Eliza Hafiz; Rizal Razman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 3.061

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.