OBJECTIVE: Alpha-adrenergic blockade is currently the first choice of preoperative treatment in patients with functional pheochromocytoma and sympathetic paraganglioma. Nevertheless, there is no consensus whether selective or non-selective alpha-blockade is superior for preventing both perioperative hemodynamic instability and complications. DESIGN: Our study aimed to compare selective and non-selective alpha-blockade through a systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. Randomized and observational studies comparing selective and non-selective alpha-blockade in pheochromocytoma and sympathetic paraganglioma surgery in adults were included. Data on perioperative hemodynamic parameters and postoperative outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: Eleven studies with 1344 patients were enrolled. Patients receiving selective alpha-blockade had higher maximum intraoperative systolic blood pressure (WMD: 12.14 mmHg, 95% CI: 6.06-18.21, P < 0.0001) compared to those treated with non-selective alpha-blockade. Additionally, in the group pretreated with selective alpha-blockers, intraoperative vasodilators were used more frequently (OR: 2.46, 95% CI 1.44-4.20, P = 0.001). Patients treated with selective alpha-blockers had lower minimum intraoperative systolic blood pressure (WMD: -2.03 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.06 to -0.01, P = 0.05) and shorter length of hospital stay (WMD: -0.58 days, 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.04, P = 0.04). Operative time, overall morbidity and mortality did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows non-selective alpha-blockade was more effective in preventing intraoperative blood pressure fluctuations while maintaining comparable risk of both intraoperative and postoperative hypotension and overall morbidity.
OBJECTIVE: Alpha-adrenergic blockade is currently the first choice of preoperative treatment in patients with functional pheochromocytoma and sympathetic paraganglioma. Nevertheless, there is no consensus whether selective or non-selective alpha-blockade is superior for preventing both perioperative hemodynamic instability and complications. DESIGN: Our study aimed to compare selective and non-selective alpha-blockade through a systematic review with meta-analysis. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. Randomized and observational studies comparing selective and non-selective alpha-blockade in pheochromocytoma and sympathetic paraganglioma surgery in adults were included. Data on perioperative hemodynamic parameters and postoperative outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: Eleven studies with 1344 patients were enrolled. Patients receiving selective alpha-blockade had higher maximum intraoperative systolic blood pressure (WMD: 12.14 mmHg, 95% CI: 6.06-18.21, P < 0.0001) compared to those treated with non-selective alpha-blockade. Additionally, in the group pretreated with selective alpha-blockers, intraoperative vasodilators were used more frequently (OR: 2.46, 95% CI 1.44-4.20, P = 0.001). Patients treated with selective alpha-blockers had lower minimum intraoperative systolic blood pressure (WMD: -2.03 mmHg, 95% CI: -4.06 to -0.01, P = 0.05) and shorter length of hospital stay (WMD: -0.58 days, 95% CI: -1.12 to -0.04, P = 0.04). Operative time, overall morbidity and mortality did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows non-selective alpha-blockade was more effective in preventing intraoperative blood pressure fluctuations while maintaining comparable risk of both intraoperative and postoperative hypotension and overall morbidity.
Authors: Marta Araujo-Castro; Rogelio García Centero; María-Carmen López-García; Cristina Álvarez Escolá; María Calatayud Gutiérrez; Concepción Blanco Carrera; Paz De Miguel Novoa; Nuria Valdés Gallego; Felicia A Hanzu; Paola Gracia Gimeno; Mariana Tomé Fernández-Ladreda; Juan Carlos Percovich Hualpa; Mireia Mora Porta; Javier Lorca Álvaro; Héctor Pian; Ignacio Ruz Caracuel; Alfonso Sanjuanbenito Dehesa; Victoria Gómez Dos Santos; Ana Serrano Romero; Cristina Lamas Oliveira Journal: Endocrine Date: 2021-08-09 Impact factor: 3.633