Literature DB >> 33767785

Pediatric biobanks and parents of disabled children associations opinions on establishing children repositories in developing countries.

Svetlana Mykolaivna Gramatiuk1, Irina Yuriivna Bagmut2, Michael Ivanivich Sheremet3, Karine Sargsyan4, Alla Mironovna Yushko1,5, Serhii Mykolaevich Filipchenko2, Vitaliy Vasilyevich Maksymyuk3, Volodimir Volodimirovich Tarabanchuk3, Petro Vasilyevich Moroz3, Andriy Ivanovich Popovich6.   

Abstract

Pediatric biobanks are an indispensable resource for the research needed to bring advances in personalized medicine into pediatric medical care. It is unclear how or when these advances in medical care may reach children, but it is unlikely that research in adults will be adequate. We conducted the screening for a hypothetic problem in various European and American pediatric biobanks based on online surveys through e-mail distribution based on the Biobank Economic Modeling Tool (BEMT) questionnaire model. Participants in the survey had work experience in biobanking for at least 3 years or more. Contact information about the survey participants was confirmed on the social networks profiles (LinkedIn), as well as on generally available websites. First, we tried creating a model which can show the pediatric preclinical and basic clinical phase relationship and demonstrate how pediatric biobanking is linked to this process. Furthermore, we tried to look for new trends, and the final goal is to put the acquired knowledge into practice, so medical experts and patients could gain usable benefit from it. We concluded that leading positions must take into account ethical and legal aspects when considering the decision to include children in the biobank collection. However, communication with parents and children is essential. The biobank characteristics influence the biobank's motives to include children in the consent procedure. Moreover, the motives to include children influence how the children are involved in the consent procedure and the extent to which children are able to make voluntary decisions as part of the consent procedure. ©2020 JOURNAL of MEDICINE and LIFE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ethical and legal aspects; pediatric biobanking; specimens of sick children

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33767785      PMCID: PMC7982269          DOI: 10.25122/jml-2020-0106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Life        ISSN: 1844-122X


  25 in total

1.  Sustainability in Biobanking: Model of Biobank Graz.

Authors:  Karine Sargsyan; Tanja Macheiner; Petra Story; Manuela Strahlhofer-Augsten; Katharina Plattner; Skaiste Riegler; Gabriele Granitz; Michaela Bayer; Berthold Huppertz
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  The Biobank Economic Modeling Tool (BEMT): Online Financial Planning to Facilitate Biobank Sustainability.

Authors:  Hana Odeh; Lisa Miranda; Abhi Rao; Jim Vaught; Howard Greenman; Jeffrey McLean; Daniel Reed; Sarfraz Memon; Benjamin Fombonne; Ping Guan; Helen M Moore
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.300

3.  'Access arrangements' for biobanks: a fine line between facilitating and hindering collaboration.

Authors:  S Fortin; S Pathmasiri; R Grintuch; M Deschênes
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Formative research on perceptions of biobanking: what community members think.

Authors:  John S Luque; Gwendolyn P Quinn; Francisco A Montel-Ishino; Mariana Arevalo; Shalanda A Bynum; Shalewa Noel-Thomas; Kristen J Wells; Clement K Gwede; Cathy D Meade
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Sample and data sharing barriers in biobanking: consent, committees, and compromises.

Authors:  Flora Colledge; Kirsten Persson; Bernice Elger; David Shaw
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 2.090

6.  Attitudes and perceptions of patients towards methods of establishing a DNA biobank.

Authors:  Jill M Pulley; Margaret M Brace; Gordon R Bernard; Dan R Masys
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 7.  Implantation and extravillous trophoblast invasion: From rare archival specimens to modern biobanking.

Authors:  Gerit Moser; Berthold Huppertz
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Quality Matters: 2016 Annual Conference of the National Infrastructures for Biobanking.

Authors:  Marika Doucet; Karl Friedrich Becker; Jens Björkman; Jacques Bonnet; Bruno Clément; Maria-Grazia Daidone; Charles Duyckaerts; Gilles Erb; Helmuth Haslacher; Paul Hofman; Berthold Huppertz; Christophe Junot; Joakim Lundeberg; Andres Metspalu; Marialuisa Lavitrano; Jan-Eric Litton; Helen M Moore; Manuel Morente; Ben-Youssef Naimi; Uwe Oelmueller; Bill Ollier; Barbara Parodi; Liangliang Ruan; Giorgio Stanta; Paola Turano; Jim Vaught; Peter Watson; H-Erich Wichmann; Martin Yuille; Myriam Zaomi; Kurt Zatloukal; Georges Dagher
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  Biobanking of different body fluids within the frame of IVF-a standard operating procedure to improve reproductive biology research.

Authors:  Michael Schenk; Berthold Huppertz; Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch; Darja Kastelic; Martina Hörmann-Kröpfl; Gregor Weiss
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Ethical and deontological aspects of pediatric biobanks: the situation in Italy.

Authors:  Nunzia Cannovo; Rosa Guarino; Piergiorgio Fedeli
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 1.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.