Literature DB >> 33767284

Behavioral state resource selection in invasive wild pigs in the Southeastern United States.

Lindsay M Clontz1, Kim M Pepin2, Kurt C VerCauteren2, James C Beasley3.   

Abstract

Elucidating correlations between wild pig (Sus scrofa) behavior and landscape attributes can aid in the advancement of management strategies for controlling populations. Using GPS data from 49 wild pigs in the southeastern U.S., we used hidden Markov models to define movement path characteristics and assign behaviors (e.g., resting, foraging, travelling). We then explored the connection between these behaviors and resource selection for both sexes between two distinct seasons based on forage availability (i.e., low forage, high forage). Females demonstrated a crepuscular activity pattern in the high-forage season and a variable pattern in the low-forage season, while males exhibited nocturnal activity patterns across both seasons. Wild pigs selected for bottomland hardwoods and dense canopy cover in all behavioral states in both seasons. Males selected for diversity in vegetation types while foraging in the low-forage season compared to the high-forage season and demonstrated an increased use of linear anthropogenic features across seasons while traveling. Wild pigs can establish populations and home ranges in an array of landscapes, but our results demonstrate male and female pigs exhibit clear differences in movement behavior and there are key resources associated with common behaviors that can be targeted to improve the efficiency of management programs.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33767284     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86363-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  14 in total

1.  Habitat structure and population persistence in an experimental community.

Authors:  S P Ellner; E McCauley; B E Kendall; C J Briggs; P R Hosseini; S N Wood; A Janssen; M W Sabelis; P Turchin; R M Nisbet; W W Murdoch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Incorporating animal spatial memory in step selection functions.

Authors:  Luiz Gustavo R Oliveira-Santos; James D Forester; Ubiratan Piovezan; Walfrido M Tomas; Fernando A S Fernandez
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 3.  Understanding movement data and movement processes: current and emerging directions.

Authors:  Robert S Schick; Scott R Loarie; Fernando Colchero; Benjamin D Best; Andre Boustany; Dalia A Conde; Patrick N Halpin; Lucas N Joppa; Catherine M McClellan; James S Clark
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 9.492

4.  Classifying movement behaviour in relation to environmental conditions using hidden Markov models.

Authors:  Toby A Patterson; Marinelle Basson; Mark V Bravington; John S Gunn
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-06-26       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis.

Authors:  James D Forester; Hae Kyung Im; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  Evaluating the predictive abilities of community occupancy models using AUC while accounting for imperfect detection.

Authors:  Elise F Zipkin; Evan H Campbell Grant; William F Fagan
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.657

7.  Predicting functional responses in agro-ecosystems from animal movement data to improve management of invasive pests.

Authors:  Mark Q Wilber; Sarah M Chinn; James C Beasley; Raoul K Boughton; Ryan K Brook; Stephen S Ditchkoff; Justin W Fischer; Steve B Hartley; Lindsey K Holmstrom; John C Kilgo; Jesse S Lewis; Ryan S Miller; Nathan P Snow; Kurt C VerCauteren; Samantha M Wisely; Colleen T Webb; Kim M Pepin
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 4.657

8.  Effects of scale of movement, detection probability, and true population density on common methods of estimating population density.

Authors:  David A Keiter; Amy J Davis; Olin E Rhodes; Fred L Cunningham; John C Kilgo; Kim M Pepin; James C Beasley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Biotic and abiotic factors predicting the global distribution and population density of an invasive large mammal.

Authors:  Jesse S Lewis; Matthew L Farnsworth; Chris L Burdett; David M Theobald; Miranda Gray; Ryan S Miller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Development and evaluation of habitat suitability models for nesting white-headed woodpecker (Dryobates albolarvatus) in burned forest.

Authors:  Quresh S Latif; Victoria A Saab; Jonathan G Dudley; Amy Markus; Kim Mellen-McLean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Food resources affect territoriality of invasive wild pig sounders with implications for control.

Authors:  John C Kilgo; James E Garabedian; Mark Vukovich; Peter E Schlichting; Michael E Byrne; James C Beasley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.