Literature DB >> 33767219

eDNA metabarcoding for biodiversity assessment, generalist predators as sampling assistants.

Marta De Barba1, Laura Iacolina2,3,4, Louise Nørgaard5,6, Carsten Riis Olesen7, Kristian Trøjelsgaard2, Cino Pertoldi2,3, Jeppe Lund Nielsen2, Pierre Taberlet1,8, Aritz Ruiz-González9,10.   

Abstract

With an accelerating negative impact of anthropogenic actions on natural ecosystems, non-invasive biodiversity assessments are becoming increasingly crucial. As a consequence, the interest in the application of environmental DNA (eDNA) survey techniques has increased. The use of eDNA extracted from faeces from generalist predators, have recently been described as "biodiversity capsules" and suggested as a complementary tool for improving current biodiversity assessments. In this study, using faecal samples from two generalist omnivore species, the Eurasian badger and the red fox, we evaluated the applicability of eDNA metabarcoding in determining dietary composition, compared to macroscopic diet identification techniques. Subsequently, we used the dietary information obtained to assess its contribution to biodiversity assessments. Compared to classic macroscopic techniques, we found that eDNA metabarcoding detected more taxa, at higher taxonomic resolution, and proved to be an important technique to verify the species identification of the predator from field collected faeces. Furthermore, we showed how dietary analyses complemented field observations in describing biodiversity by identifying consumed flora and fauna that went unnoticed during field observations. While diet analysis approaches could not substitute field observations entirely, we suggest that their integration with other methods might overcome intrinsic limitations of single techniques in future biodiversity surveys.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33767219     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85488-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  20 in total

Review 1.  Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing.

Authors:  Francois Pompanon; Bruce E Deagle; William O C Symondson; David S Brown; Simon N Jarman; Pierre Taberlet
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 2.  Emerging Technologies to Conserve Biodiversity.

Authors:  Stuart L Pimm; Sky Alibhai; Richard Bergl; Alex Dehgan; Chandra Giri; Zoë Jewell; Lucas Joppa; Roland Kays; Scott Loarie
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 3.  Detecting diversity: emerging methods to estimate species diversity.

Authors:  Kelly J Iknayan; Morgan W Tingley; Brett J Furnas; Steven R Beissinger
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Body size determines soil community assembly in a tropical forest.

Authors:  Lucie Zinger; Pierre Taberlet; Heidy Schimann; Aurélie Bonin; Frédéric Boyer; Marta De Barba; Philippe Gaucher; Ludovic Gielly; Charline Giguet-Covex; Amaia Iribar; Maxime Réjou-Méchain; Gilles Rayé; Delphine Rioux; Vincent Schilling; Blaise Tymen; Jérôme Viers; Cyril Zouiten; Wilfried Thuiller; Eric Coissac; Jérôme Chave
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Metabarcoding for the parallel identification of several hundred predators and their prey: Application to bat species diet analysis.

Authors:  Maxime Galan; Jean-Baptiste Pons; Orianne Tournayre; Éric Pierre; Maxime Leuchtmann; Dominique Pontier; Nathalie Charbonnel
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 7.090

6.  Agriculture shapes the trophic niche of a bat preying on multiple pest arthropods across Europe: Evidence from DNA metabarcoding.

Authors:  Ostaizka Aizpurua; Ivana Budinski; Panagiotis Georgiakakis; Shyam Gopalakrishnan; Carlos Ibañez; Vanessa Mata; Hugo Rebelo; Danilo Russo; Farkas Szodoray-Parádi; Violeta Zhelyazkova; Vida Zrncic; M Thomas P Gilbert; Antton Alberdi
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 7.  Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity.

Authors:  Bradley J Cardinale; J Emmett Duffy; Andrew Gonzalez; David U Hooper; Charles Perrings; Patrick Venail; Anita Narwani; Georgina M Mace; David Tilman; David A Wardle; Ann P Kinzig; Gretchen C Daily; Michel Loreau; James B Grace; Anne Larigauderie; Diane S Srivastava; Shahid Naeem
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Conservation in a cup of water: estimating biodiversity and population abundance from environmental DNA.

Authors:  David M Lodge; Cameron R Turner; Christopher L Jerde; Matthew A Barnes; Lindsay Chadderton; Scott P Egan; Jeffrey L Feder; Andrew R Mahon; Michael E Pfrender
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  The Point Count Transect Method for Estimates of Biodiversity on Coral Reefs: Improving the Sampling of Rare Species.

Authors:  T Edward Roberts; Thomas C Bridge; M Julian Caley; Andrew H Baird
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spider Web DNA: A New Spin on Noninvasive Genetics of Predator and Prey.

Authors:  Charles C Y Xu; Ivy J Yen; Dean Bowman; Cameron R Turner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Interspecific coprophagia by wild red foxes: DNA metabarcoding reveals a potentially widespread form of commensalism among animals.

Authors:  Cristian N Waggershauser; Pierre Taberlet; Eric Coissac; Kenny Kortland; Catherine Hambly; Xavier Lambin
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-07-03       Impact factor: 3.167

2.  DNA metabarcoding reveals a broad dietary range for Tasmanian devils introduced to a naive ecosystem.

Authors:  Elspeth A McLennan; Phil Wise; Andrew V Lee; Catherine E Grueber; Katherine Belov; Carolyn J Hogg
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 3.  Pollinator nutrition and its role in merging the dual objectives of pollinator health and optimal crop production.

Authors:  Jeremy Jones; Romina Rader
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 6.671

4.  Focal vs. fecal: Seasonal variation in the diet of wild vervet monkeys from observational and DNA metabarcoding data.

Authors:  Loïc Brun; Judith Schneider; Eduard Mas Carrió; Pooja Dongre; Pierre Taberlet; Luca Fumagalli
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.167

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.