Guoshu Bi1, Jiaqi Liang1, Yuansheng Zheng1, Runmei Li2, Mengnan Zhao1, Yiwei Huang1, Cheng Zhan3, Songtao Xu1, Hong Fan4. 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200000, China. 3. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China. czhan10@fudan.edu.cn. 4. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, No. 180 Fenglin Rd, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China. fan.hong@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor invasiveness reflects many biological changes associated with tumorigenesis, progression, metastasis, and drug resistance. Therefore, we performed a systematic assessment of invasiveness-related molecular features across multiple human cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-omics data, including gene expression, miRNA, DNA methylation, and somatic mutation, in approximately 10,000 patients across 30 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus, PRECOG, and our institution were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Based on a robust gene signature, we established an invasiveness score and found that the score was significantly associated with worse prognosis in almost all cancers. Then, we identified common invasiveness-associated dysregulated molecular features between high- and low-invasiveness score group across multiple cancers, as well as investigated their mutual interfering relationships thus determining whether the dysregulation of invasiveness-related genes was caused by abnormal promoter methylation or miRNA expression. We also analyzed the correlations between the drug sensitivity data from cancer cell lines and the expression level of 685 invasiveness-related genes differentially expressed in at least ten cancer types. An integrated analysis of the correlations among invasiveness-related genetic features and drug response were conducted in esophageal carcinoma patients to outline the complicated regulatory mechanism of tumor invasiveness status in multiple dimensions. Moreover, functional enrichment suggests the invasiveness score might serve as a predictive biomarker for cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our pan-cancer study provides a comprehensive atlas of tumor invasiveness and may guide more precise therapeutic strategies for tumor patients.
BACKGROUND:Tumor invasiveness reflects many biological changes associated with tumorigenesis, progression, metastasis, and drug resistance. Therefore, we performed a systematic assessment of invasiveness-related molecular features across multiple humancancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Multi-omics data, including gene expression, miRNA, DNA methylation, and somatic mutation, in approximately 10,000 patients across 30 cancer types from The Cancer Genome Atlas, Gene Expression Omnibus, PRECOG, and our institution were enrolled in this study. RESULTS: Based on a robust gene signature, we established an invasiveness score and found that the score was significantly associated with worse prognosis in almost all cancers. Then, we identified common invasiveness-associated dysregulated molecular features between high- and low-invasiveness score group across multiple cancers, as well as investigated their mutual interfering relationships thus determining whether the dysregulation of invasiveness-related genes was caused by abnormal promoter methylation or miRNA expression. We also analyzed the correlations between the drug sensitivity data from cancer cell lines and the expression level of 685 invasiveness-related genes differentially expressed in at least ten cancer types. An integrated analysis of the correlations among invasiveness-related genetic features and drug response were conducted in esophageal carcinomapatients to outline the complicated regulatory mechanism of tumor invasiveness status in multiple dimensions. Moreover, functional enrichment suggests the invasiveness score might serve as a predictive biomarker for cancerpatients receiving immunotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our pan-cancer study provides a comprehensive atlas of tumor invasiveness and may guide more precise therapeutic strategies for tumorpatients.
Authors: Tiffany J Morris; Lee M Butcher; Andrew Feber; Andrew E Teschendorff; Ankur R Chakravarthy; Tomasz K Wojdacz; Stephan Beck Journal: Bioinformatics Date: 2013-12-12 Impact factor: 6.937
Authors: Giovanni Reddiconto; Claudia Toto; Ilaria Palamà; Simone De Leo; Emanuela de Luca; Serena De Matteis; Luciana Dini; Carlo Gambacorti Passerini; Nicola Di Renzo; Michele Maffia; Addolorata Maria Luce Coluccia Journal: Blood Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Lauren Averett Byers; Lixia Diao; Jing Wang; Pierre Saintigny; Luc Girard; Michael Peyton; Li Shen; Youhong Fan; Uma Giri; Praveen K Tumula; Monique B Nilsson; Jayanthi Gudikote; Hai Tran; Robert J G Cardnell; David J Bearss; Steven L Warner; Jason M Foulks; Steven B Kanner; Varsha Gandhi; Nancy Krett; Steven T Rosen; Edward S Kim; Roy S Herbst; George R Blumenschein; J Jack Lee; Scott M Lippman; K Kian Ang; Gordon B Mills; Waun K Hong; John N Weinstein; Ignacio I Wistuba; Kevin R Coombes; John D Minna; John V Heymach Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2012-10-22 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Clifford A Hudis; William E Barlow; Joseph P Costantino; Robert J Gray; Kathleen I Pritchard; Judith-Anne W Chapman; Joseph A Sparano; Sally Hunsberger; Rebecca A Enos; Richard D Gelber; Jo Anne Zujewski Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-05-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Hui Zhang; Tao Liu; Zhen Zhang; Samuel H Payne; Bai Zhang; Jason E McDermott; Jian-Ying Zhou; Vladislav A Petyuk; Li Chen; Debjit Ray; Shisheng Sun; Feng Yang; Lijun Chen; Jing Wang; Punit Shah; Seong Won Cha; Paul Aiyetan; Sunghee Woo; Yuan Tian; Marina A Gritsenko; Therese R Clauss; Caitlin Choi; Matthew E Monroe; Stefani Thomas; Song Nie; Chaochao Wu; Ronald J Moore; Kun-Hsing Yu; David L Tabb; David Fenyö; Vineet Bafna; Yue Wang; Henry Rodriguez; Emily S Boja; Tara Hiltke; Robert C Rivers; Lori Sokoll; Heng Zhu; Ie-Ming Shih; Leslie Cope; Akhilesh Pandey; Bing Zhang; Michael P Snyder; Douglas A Levine; Richard D Smith; Daniel W Chan; Karin D Rodland Journal: Cell Date: 2016-06-29 Impact factor: 41.582