Literature DB >> 33765281

Assessing Ribosome Distribution Along Transcripts with Polarity Scores and Regression Slope Estimates.

Ilya E Vorontsov1,2, Artyom A Egorov3,4,5, Aleksandra S Anisimova4,6,7, Irina A Eliseeva2, Vsevolod J Makeev1,3,8, Vadim N Gladyshev9, Sergey E Dmitriev10,11,12,13, Ivan V Kulakovskiy14,15,16,17,18.   

Abstract

During translation, the rate of ribosome movement along mRNA varies. This leads to a non-uniform ribosome distribution along the transcript, depending on local mRNA sequence, structure, tRNA availability, and translation factor abundance, as well as the relationship between the overall rates of initiation, elongation, and termination. Stress, antibiotics, and genetic perturbations affecting composition and properties of translation machinery can alter the ribosome positional distribution dramatically. Here, we offer a computational protocol for analyzing positional distribution profiles using ribosome profiling (Ribo-Seq) data. The protocol uses papolarity, a new Python toolkit for the analysis of transcript-level short read coverage profiles. For a single sample, for each transcript papolarity allows for computing the classic polarity metric which, in the case of Ribo-Seq, reflects ribosome positional preferences. For comparison versus a control sample, papolarity estimates an improved metric, the relative linear regression slope of coverage along transcript length. This involves de-noising by profile segmentation with a Poisson model and aggregation of Ribo-Seq coverage within segments, thus achieving reliable estimates of the regression slope. The papolarity software and the associated protocol can be conveniently used for Ribo-Seq data analysis in the command-line Linux environment. Papolarity package is available through Python pip package manager. The source code is available at https://github.com/autosome-ru/papolarity .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Linear regression; Polarity; Ribo-Seq; Ribosome distribution; Ribosome footprint coverage; Ribosome footprint density; Segmentation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33765281     DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1150-0_13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  17 in total

1.  Rli1/ABCE1 Recycles Terminating Ribosomes and Controls Translation Reinitiation in 3'UTRs In Vivo.

Authors:  David J Young; Nicholas R Guydosh; Fan Zhang; Alan G Hinnebusch; Rachel Green
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Tma64/eIF2D, Tma20/MCT-1, and Tma22/DENR Recycle Post-termination 40S Subunits In Vivo.

Authors:  David J Young; Desislava S Makeeva; Fan Zhang; Aleksandra S Anisimova; Elena A Stolboushkina; Fardin Ghobakhlou; Ivan N Shatsky; Sergey E Dmitriev; Alan G Hinnebusch; Nicholas R Guydosh
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Cotranslational response to proteotoxic stress by elongation pausing of ribosomes.

Authors:  Botao Liu; Yan Han; Shu-Bing Qian
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  Hcr1/eIF3j Is a 60S Ribosomal Subunit Recycling Accessory Factor In Vivo.

Authors:  David J Young; Nicholas R Guydosh
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Genome-wide ribosome profiling reveals complex translational regulation in response to oxidative stress.

Authors:  Maxim V Gerashchenko; Alexei V Lobanov; Vadim N Gladyshev
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ribosome profiling of mouse embryonic stem cells reveals the complexity and dynamics of mammalian proteomes.

Authors:  Nicholas T Ingolia; Liana F Lareau; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling.

Authors:  Nicholas T Ingolia; Sina Ghaemmaghami; John R S Newman; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Insights into the mechanisms of eukaryotic translation gained with ribosome profiling.

Authors:  Dmitry E Andreev; Patrick B F O'Connor; Gary Loughran; Sergey E Dmitriev; Pavel V Baranov; Ivan N Shatsky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  A role for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ABCF protein New1 in translation termination/recycling.

Authors:  Villu Kasari; Agnieszka A Pochopien; Tõnu Margus; Victoriia Murina; Kathryn Turnbull; Yang Zhou; Tracy Nissan; Michael Graf; Jiří Nováček; Gemma C Atkinson; Marcus J O Johansson; Daniel N Wilson; Vasili Hauryliuk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Translation inhibitors cause abnormalities in ribosome profiling experiments.

Authors:  Maxim V Gerashchenko; Vadim N Gladyshev
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cellular responses to halofuginone reveal a vulnerability of the GCN2 branch of the integrated stress response.

Authors:  Aleksandra P Pitera; Maria Szaruga; Sew-Yeu Peak-Chew; Steven W Wingett; Anne Bertolotti
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 14.012

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.