Literature DB >> 33765070

Gene flow in commercial alfalfa (Medicago sativa subsp. sativa L.) seed production fields: Distance is the primary but not the sole influence on adventitious presence.

Sandya R Kesoju1, Matthew Kramer2, Johanne Brunet3, Stephanie L Greene4, Amelia Jordan5, Ruth C Martin6.   

Abstract

In insect-pollinated crops, gene flow is affected by numerous factors including crop characteristics, mating system, life history, pollinators, and planting management practices. Previous studies have concentrated on the impact of distance between genetically engineered (GE) and conventional fields on adventitious presence (AP) which represents the unwanted presence of a GE gene. Variables other than distance, however, may affect AP. In addition, some AP is often present in the parent seed lots used to establish conventional fields. To identify variables that influence the proportion of AP in conventional alfalfa fields, we performed variable selection regression analyses. Analyses based on a sample-level and a field-level analysis gave similar, though not identical results. For the sample-level model, distance from the GE field explained 66% of the variance in AP, confirming its importance in affecting AP. The area of GE fields within the pollinator foraging range explained an additional 30% of the variation in AP in the model. The density of alfalfa leafcutting bee domiciles influenced AP in both models. To minimize AP in conventional alfalfa seed fields, management practices should focus on optimizing isolation distances while also considering the size of the GE pollen pool within the pollinator foraging range, and the foraging behavior of pollinators.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33765070      PMCID: PMC7993763          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  30 in total

1.  Measuring gene flow in the cultivation of transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).

Authors:  Bao-Hong Zhang; Xiao-Ping Pan; Teng-Long Guo; Qing-Lian Wang; Todd A Anderson
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.695

2.  The Circe principle explains how resource-rich land can waylay pollinators in fragmented landscapes.

Authors:  Tonya A Lander; Daniel P Bebber; Chris T L Choy; Stephen A Harris; David H Boshier
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  The effects of time, temperature and plant variety on pollen viability and its implications for gene flow risk.

Authors:  J Brunet; R Ziobro; J Osvatic; M K Clayton
Journal:  Plant Biol (Stuttg)       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 3.081

Review 4.  Is gene flow the most important evolutionary force in plants?

Authors:  Norman C Ellstrand
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.844

5.  Mating patterns, pollen dispersal, and the ecological maternal neighbourhood in a Prunus mahaleb L. population.

Authors:  C García; J M Arroyo; J A Godoy; P Jordano
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Pollinating bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) of U.S. alfalfa compared for rates of pod and seed set.

Authors:  James H Cane
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

8.  Pollen-mediated gene flow from transgenic to non-transgenic switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) in the field.

Authors:  Reginald Millwood; Madhugiri Nageswara-Rao; Rongjian Ye; Ellie Terry-Emert; Chelsea R Johnson; Micaha Hanson; Jason N Burris; Charles Kwit; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.563

9.  Linking the foraging behavior of three bee species to pollen dispersal and gene flow.

Authors:  Johanne Brunet; Yang Zhao; Murray K Clayton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reduced Water Negatively Impacts Social Bee Survival and Productivity Via Shifts in Floral Nutrition.

Authors:  Erin E Wilson Rankin; Sarah K Barney; Giselle E Lozano
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 1.857

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.