Literature DB >> 33763771

The influence of migration of the exeter V40 stem on patient reported outcome measures: a 2-year follow-up of 112 total hip arthroplasties using radiostereometric analysis.

Daniel K Steiner1,2, Nikolaj S Drivsholm3, Sebastian T E Buchardt3, Mogens Laursen3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The cemented Exeter V40 stem is known to migrate distally. Several previous studies have reported on the extent of stem migration and its influence on clinical outcome. However, no studies have investigated the influence of stem migration on Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROM).
METHODS: One hundred and twelve total hip arthroplasties (THA) were included in a 2-year follow-up using Radiostereometric Analysis (RSA). Patients were evaluated using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and EQ-5D-3L PROMs. The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of stem migration, measured by Maximum Total Point Motion (MTPM), on the 2-year postoperative score (OHS and EQ-5D). Furthermore, the influence of pre-operative PROM, age, gender, acetabular component and BMI was associated with the 2-year postoperative OHS and EQ-5D scores.
RESULTS: MTPM was a non-significant predictor of the 2-year postoperative OHS (regression coefficient (B) = - 2.38 (CI - 5.44; .69)) and of the 2-year postoperative EQ-5D (B = - .01 (CI - .04; .02)). The only significant predictor of the 2-year postoperative OHS and 2-year postoperative EQ-5D was gender (B = 8.71 (CI 3.52; 13.90)) and (B = .13 (CI .07; .18)), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Stem migration did not significantly influence PROMs at 2 years post-operatively. Using a patient-focused approach, our results seem to corroborate results reported by previous studies, showing that slow migration of the Exeter V40 stem does not seem to influence the clinical outcome.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Orthopaedics; PROM; Patient-reported outcomes; Radiostereometric analysis; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33763771     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-02937-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  15 in total

1.  Should total hip arthroplasty femoral components be designed to subside? A radiostereometric analysis study of the Charnley Elite and Exeter stems.

Authors:  J Alfaro-Adrián; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Femoral stem fixation. An engineering interpretation of the long-term outcome of Charnley and Exeter stems.

Authors:  G Shen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-09

3.  Predictors of quality of life outcomes after revision total hip replacement.

Authors:  G S Biring; B A Masri; N V Greidanus; C P Duncan; D S Garbuz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-11

4.  The impact of body mass index on patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) and complications following primary hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Simon S Jameson; James M Mason; Paul N Baker; David W Elson; David J Deehan; Mike R Reed
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Movement pattern of the Exeter femoral stem; a radiostereometric analysis of 22 primary hip arthroplasties followed for 5 years..

Authors:  Anna Stefánsdóttir; Herbert Franzén; Ragnar Johnsson; Ewald Ornstein; Martin Sundberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2004-08

6.  Age, gender, obesity, and depression are associated with patient-related pain and function outcome after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David Lewallen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  The Exeter femoral stem continues to migrate during its first decade after implantation: 10-12 years of follow-up with radiostereometric analysis (RSA).

Authors:  Marc J Nieuwenhuijse; Edward R Valstar; Bart L Kaptein; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Is the use of antidepressants associated with patient-reported outcomes following total hip replacement surgery?

Authors:  Meridith E Greene; Ola Rolfson; Max Gordon; Kristina Annerbrink; Henrik Malchau; Göran Garellick
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  The impact of age and preoperative health-related quality of life on patient-reported improvements after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Peter K Aalund; Eva N Glassou; Torben B Hansen
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.458

10.  Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Danish version of the Oxford hip score: Assessed against generic and disease-specific questionnaires.

Authors:  A Paulsen; A Odgaard; S Overgaard
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 5.853

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.