Literature DB >> 17998179

Predictors of quality of life outcomes after revision total hip replacement.

G S Biring1, B A Masri, N V Greidanus, C P Duncan, D S Garbuz.   

Abstract

A prospective cohort of 222 patients who underwent revision hip replacement between April 2001 and March 2004 was evaluated to determine predictors of function, pain and activity level between one and two years post-operatively, and to define quality of life outcomes using validated patient reported outcome tools. Predictive models were developed and proportional odds regression analyses were performed to identify factors that predict quality of life outcomes at one and two years post-operatively. The dependent outcome variables were the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) function and pain scores, and University of California Los Angeles activity scores. The independent variables included patient demographics, operative factors, and objective quality of life parameters, including pre-operative WOMAC, and the Short Form-12 mental component score. There was a significant improvement (t-test, p < 0.001) in all patient quality of life scores. In the predictive model, factors predictive of improved function (original regression analyses, p < 0.05) included a higher pre-operative WOMAC function score (p < 0.001), age between 60 and 70 years (p < 0.037), male gender (p = 0.017), lower Charnley class (p < 0.001) and aseptic loosening being the indication for revision (p < 0.003). Using the WOMAC pain score as an outcome variable, factors predictive of improvement included the pre-operative WOMAC function score (p = 0.001), age between 60 and 70 years (p = 0.004), male gender (p = 0.005), lower Charnley class (p = 0.001) and no previous revision procedure (p = 0.023). The pre-operative WOMAC function score (p = 0.001), the indication for the operation (p = 0.007), and the operating surgeon (p = 0.008) were significant predictors of the activity assessment at follow-up. Predictors of quality of life outcomes after revision hip replacement were established. Although some patient-specific and surgery-specific variables were important, age, gender, Charnley class and pre-operative WOMAC function score had the most robust associations with outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17998179     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B11.19617

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  13 in total

1.  Comparison of pre- and post-operative health-related quality of life and length of stay after primary total hip replacement in matched English and German patient cohorts.

Authors:  Matthias Vogl; Reiner Leidl; Werner Plötz; Nils Gutacker
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Hip arthroplasty after previous arthrodesis.

Authors:  Erik D Peterson; Joseph P Nemanich; Aaron Altenburg; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Patient-level improvements in pain and activities of daily living after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 7.580

4.  Age, gender, obesity, and depression are associated with patient-related pain and function outcome after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David Lewallen
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  The influence of migration of the exeter V40 stem on patient reported outcome measures: a 2-year follow-up of 112 total hip arthroplasties using radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  Daniel K Steiner; Nikolaj S Drivsholm; Sebastian T E Buchardt; Mogens Laursen
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-03-25

6.  Effect of Preoperative Modifiable Psychological and Behavioural Factors on Early Outcome Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in an Indian Population.

Authors:  Saurabh Sharma; Vijay Kumar; Mamta Sood; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 1.251

7.  Predictors of excellent early outcome after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  George H Smith; Simon Johnson; James A Ballantyne; Edward Dunstan; Ivan J Brenkel
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  What Are Risk Factors for Infection after Primary or Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 80 Years?

Authors:  Nipun Sodhi; Hiba K Anis; Rushabh M Vakharia; Alexander J Acuña; Peter A Gold; Luke J Garbarino; Bilal M Mahmood; Nicholas R Arnold; Joseph O Ehiorobo; Eric L Grossman; Michael A Mont; Martin W Roche
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  The impact of preoperative patient characteristics on the cost-effectiveness of total hip replacement: a cohort study.

Authors:  Matthias Vogl; Rainer Wilkesmann; Christian Lausmann; Werner Plötz
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Operative diagnosis for revision total hip arthroplasty is associated with patient-reported outcomes (PROs).

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; David G Lewallen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.