Literature DB >> 3376375

Cylinder reliability of inflatable penile prosthesis. Experience with distensible and nondistensible cylinders in 325 patients.

G I Scarzella1.   

Abstract

In 325 patients inflatable penile prostheses were implanted from 1981 to 1987. All patients were diagnosed as organically impotent and subsequently the AMS inflatable penile prosthesis, using the PPS, PPT, or PND cylinders, was implanted. The scrotal approach, utilizing a transverse incision, was used in all 325 cases. The three-year cylinder survival rate was 72 percent for the PPS, 86 percent for the PPT, and 97 percent for the PND. Survival for the PPT and PND cylinders showed a statistically significant improvement when compared with the PPS cylinder. It was concluded that overall success had improved due to modification of the surgical technique and refinements in the components of the prosthesis, particularly the cylinders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3376375     DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(88)90213-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  2 in total

1.  Rear Tip Extenders and Penile Prosthesis Rigidity: A Laboratory Study of Coloplast Prostheses.

Authors:  Nannan Thirumavalavan; Billy H Cordon; Martin S Gross; Jeffrey Taylor; Jean-Francois Eid
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 2.  The Rear Tip Extender for Inflatable Penile Prostheses: Introduction of "Rigidity Factor" and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Nannan Thirumavalavan; Billy H Cordon; Martin S Gross; Jeffrey Taylor; Jean-Francois Eid
Journal:  Sex Med Rev       Date:  2018-12-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.