Literature DB >> 29884443

Rear Tip Extenders and Penile Prosthesis Rigidity: A Laboratory Study of Coloplast Prostheses.

Nannan Thirumavalavan1, Billy H Cordon2, Martin S Gross3, Jeffrey Taylor4, Jean-Francois Eid5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rear tip extenders (RTEs) are used commonly in penile prostheses, but their effect on erectile rigidity has not been extensively studied. AIM: To determine whether RTEs affect erectile rigidity in inflatable penile prostheses and determine what length of RTE should be used for a given corporal length-in this case, 22 cm.
METHODS: To assess the effect of RTEs on erectile rigidity, we created a penile model simulating 2 corpora cavernosa that accommodated cylinders of varying lengths. Once the cylinders were inflated, a 200-g weight was then uniformly placed on the tip of the cylinders and deflection was measured using a ruler. Measurements were repeated for varying cylinder/RTE lengths to total 22 cm of overall corporal length. OUTCOMES: Differences in rigidity and angular deflection based on RTE length were assessed.
RESULTS: Increasing the length of RTEs increased the deflection in our model, indicative of decreased axial rigidity. CLINICAL TRANSLATIONS: The current work implies that having additional RTEs may decrease penile rigidity and in turn, patient satisfaction. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Though assessing effect of RTEs on erectile rigidity is novel, the exact ability of our model to predict in-vivo behavior is unknown.
CONCLUSION: An inflatable penile prosthesis represents a heterogeneous beam given that it is composed of a non-inflatable rear combined to an inflatable cylinder. In this model greater bending deflection was associated with more RTE length. Greater RTE length decreases the size of the inflatable device that can be implanted. The erect penis is subject to axial stress and bending deflection. Though further work is needed, these data support the notion that maximizing inflatable length by minimizing RTEs will improve overall erectile rigidity dynamics. Thirumavalavan N, Cordon BH, Gross MS, et al. Rear Tip Extenders and Penile Prosthesis Rigidity: A Laboratory Study of Coloplast Prostheses. J Sex Med 2018;15:1030-1033.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Inflatable Penile Prosthesis; Model; Rear Tip Extender; Rigidity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29884443      PMCID: PMC6358419          DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  7 in total

1.  Longitudinal and Horizontal Load Testing of Inflatable Penile Implant Cylinders of Two Manufacturers: An Ex Vivo Demonstration of Inflated Rigidity.

Authors:  Jason M Scovell; Liehui Ge; Enrique V Barrera; Steven K Wilson; Rafael E Carrion; Tariq S Hakky
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Cylinder reliability of inflatable penile prosthesis. Experience with distensible and nondistensible cylinders in 325 patients.

Authors:  G I Scarzella
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Improved mechanical survival with revised model inflatable penile prosthesis using rear-tip extenders.

Authors:  T R Malloy; A J Wein; V L Carpiniello
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Penile Prosthesis First and Replacement Surgeries: Analysis of Patient and Partner Satisfaction.

Authors:  Enrique Lledó-García; José Jara-Rascón; Ignacio Moncada Iribarren; Javier Piñero-Sánchez; Juan Aragón-Chamizo; Carlos Hernández-Fernández
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates among elderly male aged ≥75 years with inflatable penile prosthesis implant for medically refractory erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Eric Chung; Matt Solomon; Ling DeYoung; Gerald B Brock
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Comparison between AMS 700™ CX and Coloplast™ Titan inflatable penile prosthesis for Peyronie's disease treatment and remodeling: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Eric Chung; Matthew Solomon; Ling DeYoung; Gerald B Brock
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 3.802

7.  Axial penile rigidity influences patient and partner satisfaction after penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  Abdulla Al Ansari; Raidh A Talib; Onder Canguven; Ahmad Shamsodini
Journal:  Arch Ital Urol Androl       Date:  2013-09-26
  7 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  The Rear Tip Extender for Inflatable Penile Prostheses: Introduction of "Rigidity Factor" and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Nannan Thirumavalavan; Billy H Cordon; Martin S Gross; Jeffrey Taylor; Jean-Francois Eid
Journal:  Sex Med Rev       Date:  2018-12-11

Review 2.  Safety and Efficacy of Inflatable Penile Prostheses for the Treatment of Erectile Dysfunction: Evidence to Date.

Authors:  Vinson M Wang; Laurence A Levine
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 3.  Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.

Authors:  Michael Polchert; Brian Dick; Omer Raheem
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.