Houssem-Eddine Gueziri1, Oded Rabau2, Carlo Santaguida2, D Louis Collins1. 1. McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. 2. Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the growing incidence of patients receiving surgical treatment for spinal metastatic tumours, there is a need for developing cost-efficient and radiation-free alternatives for spinal interventions. In this paper, we evaluate the capabilities and limitations of an image-guided neurosurgery (IGNS) system that uses intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) imaging for guidance. METHODS: Using a lumbosacral section of a porcine cadaver, we explored the impact of CT image resolution, ultrasound depth and ultrasound frequency on system accuracy, robustness and effectiveness. Preoperative CT images with an isotropic resolution of , and were acquired. During surgery, vertebrae L1 to L6 were exposed. For each vertebra, five iUS scans were acquired using two depth parameters (5 cm and 7 cm) and two frequencies (6 MHz and 12 MHz). A total of 120 acquisition trials were evaluated. Ultrasound-based registration performance is compared to the standard alignment procedure using intraoperative CT. We report target registration error (TRE) and computation time. In addition, the scans' trajectories were analyzed to identify vertebral regions that provide the most relevant features for the alignment. RESULTS: For all acquisitions, the median TRE ranged from 1.42 mm to 1.58 mm and the overall computation time was 9.04 s ± 1.58 s. Fourteen out of 120 iUS acquisitions (11.66%) yielded a level-to-level mismatch (and these are included in the accuracy measurements reported). No significant effect on accuracy was found with CT resolution (F (2,10) = 1.70, p = 0.232), depth (F (1,5) = 0.22, p= 0.659) nor frequency (F (1,5) = 1.02, p = 0.359). While misalignment increases linearly with the distance from the imaged vertebra, accuracy was satisfactory for directly adjacent levels. A significant relationship was found between iUS scan coverage of laminae and articular processes, and accuracy. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative ultrasound can be used for spine surgery neuronavigation. We demonstrated that the IGNS system yield acceptable accuracy and high efficiency compared to the standard CT-based navigation procedure. The flexibility of the iUS acquisitions can have repercussions on the system performance, which are not fully identified. Further investigation is needed to understand the relationship between iUS acquisition and alignment performance.
BACKGROUND: With the growing incidence of patients receiving surgical treatment for spinal metastatic tumours, there is a need for developing cost-efficient and radiation-free alternatives for spinal interventions. In this paper, we evaluate the capabilities and limitations of an image-guided neurosurgery (IGNS) system that uses intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) imaging for guidance. METHODS: Using a lumbosacral section of a porcine cadaver, we explored the impact of CT image resolution, ultrasound depth and ultrasound frequency on system accuracy, robustness and effectiveness. Preoperative CT images with an isotropic resolution of , and were acquired. During surgery, vertebrae L1 to L6 were exposed. For each vertebra, five iUS scans were acquired using two depth parameters (5 cm and 7 cm) and two frequencies (6 MHz and 12 MHz). A total of 120 acquisition trials were evaluated. Ultrasound-based registration performance is compared to the standard alignment procedure using intraoperative CT. We report target registration error (TRE) and computation time. In addition, the scans' trajectories were analyzed to identify vertebral regions that provide the most relevant features for the alignment. RESULTS: For all acquisitions, the median TRE ranged from 1.42 mm to 1.58 mm and the overall computation time was 9.04 s ± 1.58 s. Fourteen out of 120 iUS acquisitions (11.66%) yielded a level-to-level mismatch (and these are included in the accuracy measurements reported). No significant effect on accuracy was found with CT resolution (F (2,10) = 1.70, p = 0.232), depth (F (1,5) = 0.22, p= 0.659) nor frequency (F (1,5) = 1.02, p = 0.359). While misalignment increases linearly with the distance from the imaged vertebra, accuracy was satisfactory for directly adjacent levels. A significant relationship was found between iUS scan coverage of laminae and articular processes, and accuracy. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative ultrasound can be used for spine surgery neuronavigation. We demonstrated that the IGNS system yield acceptable accuracy and high efficiency compared to the standard CT-based navigation procedure. The flexibility of the iUS acquisitions can have repercussions on the system performance, which are not fully identified. Further investigation is needed to understand the relationship between iUS acquisition and alignment performance.
Authors: K Cleary; J Anderson; M Brazaitis; G Devey; A DiGioia; M Freedman; D Grönemeyer; C Lathan; H Lemke; D Long; S K Mun; R Taylor Journal: Comput Aided Surg Date: 2000
Authors: Laurence Mercier; David Araujo; Claire Haegelen; Rolando F Del Maestro; Kevin Petrecca; D Louis Collins Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: L G Morassi; K Kokkinis; D S Evangelopoulos; O Karargyris; I Vlachou; K Kalokairinou; S G Pneumaticos Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2014-04-09 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Houssem-Eddine Gueziri; Simon Drouin; Charles X B Yan; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-06-28 Impact factor: 2.924