Literature DB >> 33762693

Lower local recurrence rate after robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy than conventional thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer.

Satoru Motoyama1,2,3, Yusuke Sato4,5, Akiyuki Wakita4,5, Yushi Nagaki4,5, Hiromu Fujita4,5, Ryohei Sasamori4,5, Kohei Kemuriyama4,5, Shinogu Takashima5, Kazuhiro Imai5, Yoshihiro Minamiya5.   

Abstract

The oncological advantages of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy (RATE) over conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy (TE) for thoracic esophageal cancer have yet to be verified. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed clinical data to compare the incidences of recurrence within the surgical field after RATE and TE as an indicator of local oncological control. Among 121 consecutive patients with thoracic esophageal or esophagogastric junction cancers for which thoracoscopic surgery was indicated, 51 were treated with RATE while 70 received TE. The number of lymph nodes dissected from the mediastinum, duration of the thoracic portion of the surgery, and morbidity due to postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups. However, the rate of overall local recurrence within the surgical field was significantly (P = 0.039) higher in the TE (9%) than the RATE (0%) group. Lymph node recurrence within the surgical field occurred in left recurrent nerve, left tracheobronchial, left main bronchus and thoracic paraaortic lymph nodes, which were all difficult to approach to dissect. The other two local failures occurred around the anastomotic site. This study indicates that using RATE enabled the incidence of recurrence within the surgical field to be reduced, though there were some limitations.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33762693     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-86420-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  2 in total

1.  Technical details of the abdominal part during full robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Felix Berlth; Carolina Mann; Eren Uzun; Evangelos Tagkalos; Edin Hadzijusufovic; Richard Hillegersberg; Hecheng Li; Jan Hendrik Egberts; Hauke Lang; Peter Philipp Grimminger
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 3.429

2.  Anastomotic stricture indexes for endoscopic balloon dilation after esophageal atresia repair: a single-center study.

Authors:  Jinshi Huang; Junmin Liao; Shen Yang; Yanan Zhang; Yong Zhao; Yichao Gu; Kaiyun Hua; Shuangshuang Li; Leizhen Xia; Siyu Cai
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 3.429

  2 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current status of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: what is the real benefit?

Authors:  Jun Kanamori; Masayuki Watanabe; Suguru Maruyama; Yasukazu Kanie; Daisuke Fujiwara; Kei Sakamoto; Akihiko Okamura; Yu Imamura
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.540

2.  Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy versus video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hao Chen; Yiyang Liu; Hao Peng; Rongchun Wang; Kang Wang; Demin Li
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.