Literature DB >> 33762603

Methodological considerations for identifying multiple plasma proteins associated with all-cause mortality in a population-based prospective cohort.

Isabel Drake1, George Hindy2,3, Peter Almgren2,4, Gunnar Engström5, Jan Nilsson6, Olle Melander4, Marju Orho-Melander2.   

Abstract

Novel methods to characterize the plasma proteome has made it possible to examine a wide range of proteins in large longitudinal cohort studies, but the complexity of the human proteome makes it difficult to identify robust protein-disease associations. Nevertheless, identification of individuals at high risk of early mortality is a central issue in clinical decision making and novel biomarkers may be useful to improve risk stratification. With adjustment for established risk factors, we examined the associations between 138 plasma proteins measured using two proximity extension assays and long-term risk of all-cause mortality in 3,918 participants of the population-based Malmö Diet and Cancer Study. To examine the reproducibility of protein-mortality associations we used a two-step random-split approach to simulate a discovery and replication cohort and conducted analyses using four different methods: Cox regression, stepwise Cox regression, Lasso-Cox regression, and random survival forest (RSF). In the total study population, we identified eight proteins that associated with all-cause mortality after adjustment for established risk factors and with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. In the two-step analyses, the number of proteins selected for model inclusion in both random samples ranged from 6 to 21 depending on the method used. However, only three proteins were consistently included in both samples across all four methods (growth/differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and epididymal secretory protein E4). Using the total study population, the C-statistic for a model including established risk factors was 0.7222 and increased to 0.7284 with inclusion of the most predictive protein (GDF-15; P < 0.0001). All multiple protein models showed additional improvement in the C-statistic compared to the single protein model (all P < 0.0001). We identified several plasma proteins associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality independently of established risk factors. Further investigation into the putatively causal role of these proteins for longevity is needed. In addition, the examined methods for identifying multiple proteins showed tendencies for overfitting by including several putatively false positive findings. Thus, the reproducibility of findings using such approaches may be limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33762603     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85991-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  39 in total

1.  The lack of utility of circulating biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction for type 2 diabetes risk prediction among postmenopausal women: the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study.

Authors:  Chun Chao; Yiqing Song; Nancy Cook; Chi-Hong Tseng; JoAnn E Manson; Charles Eaton; Karen L Margolis; Beatriz Rodriguez; Lawrence S Phillips; Lesley F Tinker; Simin Liu
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-09-27

2.  Sparse kernel methods for high-dimensional survival data.

Authors:  Ludger Evers; Claudia-Martina Messow
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Experiments to determine whether recursive partitioning (CART) or an artificial neural network overcomes theoretical limitations of Cox proportional hazards regression.

Authors:  M W Kattan; K R Hess; J R Beck
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1998-10

4.  The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model.

Authors:  R Tibshirani
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Identification of Serum Metabolites Associated With Incident Hypertension in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Potsdam Study.

Authors:  Stefan Dietrich; Anna Floegel; Cornelia Weikert; Cornelia Prehn; Jerzy Adamski; Tobias Pischon; Heiner Boeing; Dagmar Drogan
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 10.190

6.  Tree-structured survival analysis.

Authors:  L Gordon; R A Olshen
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-10

Review 7.  Biomarkers in cardiovascular disease: Statistical assessment and section on key novel heart failure biomarkers.

Authors:  Ravi Dhingra; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Trends Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 6.677

8.  Homogenous 96-plex PEA immunoassay exhibiting high sensitivity, specificity, and excellent scalability.

Authors:  Erika Assarsson; Martin Lundberg; Göran Holmquist; Johan Björkesten; Stine Bucht Thorsen; Daniel Ekman; Anna Eriksson; Emma Rennel Dickens; Sandra Ohlsson; Gabriella Edfeldt; Ann-Catrin Andersson; Patrik Lindstedt; Jan Stenvang; Mats Gullberg; Simon Fredriksson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Multiplex proteomics for prediction of major cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Christoph Nowak; Axel C Carlsson; Carl Johan Östgren; Fredrik H Nyström; Moudud Alam; Tobias Feldreich; Johan Sundström; Juan-Jesus Carrero; Jerzy Leppert; Pär Hedberg; Egil Henriksen; Antonio C Cordeiro; Vilmantas Giedraitis; Lars Lind; Erik Ingelsson; Tove Fall; Johan Ärnlöv
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Prediction of premature all-cause mortality: A prospective general population cohort study comparing machine-learning and standard epidemiological approaches.

Authors:  Stephen F Weng; Luis Vaz; Nadeem Qureshi; Joe Kai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.