Literature DB >> 33762346

Triggering an unexpected earthquake in an uncoupled subduction zone.

Matthew W Herman1, Kevin P Furlong2.   

Abstract

In the 1970s, the Shumagin Islands region of the Alaska subduction zone was identified as a seismic gap expected to host a future great [moment magnitude (M w) ≥8.0] earthquake. More recent geodetic data indicate that this region is weakly coupled, and the geologic record shows little evidence of past large events. From July to October 2020, a series of earthquakes occurred in this region, raising the possibility of greater coupling. The initial M w 7.8 thrust faulting earthquake straddled the eastern edge of the Shumagin Gap and was followed by an M w 7.6 strike-slip earthquake within the Shumagin Gap. Stress modeling indicates that this strike-slip earthquake is in fact favored if the Shumagin Gap has low coupling, whereas a highly coupled Shumagin Gap inhibits that type and location of earthquake. The initial thrust earthquake and its afterslip enhanced the strike-slip loading within the subducting slab, helping to trigger the October event.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CC BY).

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 33762346      PMCID: PMC7990338          DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abf7590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Adv        ISSN: 2375-2548            Impact factor:   14.136


  5 in total

1.  Change in failure stress on the southern san andreas fault system caused by the 1992 magnitude = 7.4 landers earthquake.

Authors:  R S Stein; G C King; J Lin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Response of regional seismicity to the static stress change produced by the loma prieta earthquake.

Authors:  P A Reasenberg; R W Simpson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Strain accumulation in the shumagin and yakataga seismic gaps, alaska.

Authors:  J C Savage; M Lisowski; W H Prescott
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Slab2, a comprehensive subduction zone geometry model.

Authors:  Gavin P Hayes; Ginevra L Moore; Daniel E Portner; Mike Hearne; Hanna Flamme; Maria Furtney; Gregory M Smoczyk
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Earthquake in a maze: compressional rupture branching during the 2012 M(w) 8.6 Sumatra earthquake.

Authors:  L Meng; J-P Ampuero; J Stock; Z Duputel; Y Luo; V C Tsai
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 47.728

  5 in total
  2 in total

1.  Aseismic slip and recent ruptures of persistent asperities along the Alaska-Aleutian subduction zone.

Authors:  Bin Zhao; Roland Bürgmann; Dongzhen Wang; Jian Zhang; Jiansheng Yu; Qi Li
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 17.694

2.  Cascading rupture of a megathrust.

Authors:  Julie L Elliott; Ronni Grapenthin; Revathy M Parameswaran; Zhuohui Xiao; Jeffrey T Freymueller; Logan Fusso
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 14.957

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.