Literature DB >> 17749422

Response of regional seismicity to the static stress change produced by the loma prieta earthquake.

P A Reasenberg, R W Simpson.   

Abstract

The 1989 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake perturbed the static stress field over a large area of central California. The pattern of stress changes on major faults in the region predicted by models of the earthquake's dislocation agrees closely with changes in the regional seismicity rate after the earthquake. The agreement is best for models with low values of the coefficient of friction (0.1 </= micro </= 0.3) on Bay Area faults. Both the stress models and measurements suggest that stresses were increased on the San Andreas fault north of the Loma Prieta rupture, but decreased slightly on the Hayward fault. This relaxation does not warrant lower probability estimates for large earthquakes on the Hayward fault in the next 30 years, however.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 17749422     DOI: 10.1126/science.255.5052.1687

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  15 in total

1.  Intermediate- and long-term earthquake prediction.

Authors:  L R Sykes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  April 2012 intra-oceanic seismicity off Sumatra boosted by the Banda-Aceh megathrust.

Authors:  Matthias Delescluse; Nicolas Chamot-Rooke; Rodolphe Cattin; Luce Fleitout; Olga Trubienko; Christophe Vigny
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Did the September 2010 (Darfield) earthquake trigger the February 2011 (Christchurch) event?

Authors:  Salvatore Stramondo; Christodoulos Kyriakopoulos; Christian Bignami; Marco Chini; Daniele Melini; Marco Moro; Matteo Picchiani; Michele Saroli; Enzo Boschi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Causal factors for seismicity near Azle, Texas.

Authors:  Matthew J Hornbach; Heather R DeShon; William L Ellsworth; Brian W Stump; Chris Hayward; Cliff Frohlich; Harrison R Oldham; Jon E Olson; M Beatrice Magnani; Casey Brokaw; James H Luetgert
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 14.919

5.  On the earthquake predictability of fault interaction models.

Authors:  W Marzocchi; D Melini
Journal:  Geophys Res Lett       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 4.720

6.  The October 23, 2011, Van (Turkey) earthquake and its relationship with neighbouring structures.

Authors: 
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Combining stress transfer and source directivity: the case of the 2012 Emilia seismic sequence.

Authors:  Vincenzo Convertito; Flaminia Catalli; Antonio Emolo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Anthropogenic triggering of large earthquakes.

Authors:  Francesco Mulargia; Andrea Bizzarri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Discriminating between natural and anthropogenic earthquakes: insights from the Emilia Romagna (Italy) 2012 seismic sequence.

Authors:  Matteo Albano; Salvatore Barba; Gabriele Tarabusi; Michele Saroli; Salvatore Stramondo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Stress buildup and drop in inland shallow crust caused by the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake events.

Authors:  Kiyotoshi Sakaguchi; Tatsuya Yokoyama; Weiren Lin; Noriaki Watanabe
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.