| Literature DB >> 33760362 |
Gao Jing Ong1,2, Olivia Girolamo2, Jeanette Stansborough1, Thanh Ha Nguyen1,2, John David Horowitz1,2.
Abstract
AIMS: Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is a form of acute myocardial inflammation, often triggered by catecholamine release surges, which accounts for approximately 10% of 'myocardial infarctions' in female patients above the age of 50. Its associated substantial risk of in-hospital mortality is mainly driven by the development of hypotension and shock. While hypotension is induced largely by factors other than low cardiac output, its precise cause is unknown, and clinical parameters associated with hypotension have not been identified previously. We therefore sought to identify the incidence and clinical/laboratory correlates of early hypotension in TTS. METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Hypotension; Left ventricular dysfunction; NT-proBNP; Takotsubo syndrome
Year: 2021 PMID: 33760362 PMCID: PMC8120397 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.13277
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ESC Heart Fail ISSN: 2055-5822
Parameters included in multivariate analysis as potential correlates of development of hypotension
| Parameters included in the multivariate analysis | |
|---|---|
| Patient demographics | Age |
| Sex | |
| Clinical characteristics | Primary/secondary TTS |
| Apical/non‐apical hypokinesis | |
| Comorbidities | Hypertension |
| Diabetes mellitus | |
| Admission medications | ACE inhibitors/ARBs |
| Laboratory parameters | Estimated GFR |
| Plasma NT‐proBNP, troponin‐T, CRP, and normetanephrine concentrations | |
| Echocardiographic parameters | Acute LVEF |
ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; CRP, C‐reactive protein; GFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide; TTS, takotsubo syndrome.
Patient demographics and baseline characteristics: comparison of patients who developed vs. those who did not develop hypotension
| Total ( | Hypotensive ( | Not hypotensive ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age [years; median (IQR)] | 68 (60–77) | 67 (60–77) | 69 (60–78) | 0.303 |
| Male ( | 24 (8%) | 3 (3%) | 21 (10%) | 0.014 |
| Secondary TTS ( | 81 | 33 | 48 (23%) | 0.237 |
| Apical TTS ( | 209 (65%) | 74 (65%) | 135 (65%) | 0.983 |
| Diabetes mellitus ( | 51 (17%) | 19 (18%) | 32 (16%) | 0.577 |
| Hypertension ( | 158 (51%) | 46 (44%) | 112 (55%) | 0.069 |
| Prior use of ACE inhibitors/ARB ( | 125 (42%) | 37 (36%) | 88 (45%) | 0.128 |
Significance values relate to comparisons of normotensive and hypotensive patients.
ACE, angiotensin‐converting enzyme; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; IQR, interquartile range; TTS, takotsubo syndrome.
A total of 14 of patients with secondary TTS had underlying sepsis. Seven of them developed hypotension.
Clinical and laboratory differences between hypotensive vs. not hypotensive patients
| Hypotensive ( | Not hypotensive ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lowest systolic blood pressure [mmHg; median (IQR)] | 80 (78–86) | 105 (100–110) | <0.001 |
| In‐hospital mortality ( | 8 (7%) | 0 (0%) | <0.001 |
| Estimated GFR [mL/min; median (IQR)] | 60 (57–80) | 62 (60–86) | 0.035 |
| LVEF [%; mean ± SD] | 44 ± 11 | 48 ± 11 | 0.009 |
| LVOT obstruction | 5 (4%) | 1 (0.5%) | 0.019 |
| NT‐proBNP [ng/L; median (IQR)] | 4714 (2781–11109) | 4120 (2410–7186) | 0.046 |
| Troponin‐T [ng/L; median (IQR)] | 480 (261–775) | 368 (200–599) | 0.008 |
| CRP [mg/L; median (IQR)] | 13 (4–54) | 10 (5–31) | 0.296 |
| Plasma metanephrine [pmol/L; median (IQR)] | 1060 (680–1570) | 970 (650–1380) | 0.491 |
CRP, C‐reactive protein; GFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; IQR, interquartile range; NT‐proBNP, N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide.
LVOT obstruction (peak LVOT gradient ≥30 mmHg on echocardiography).
Figure 1Univariate analyses of the association between the development of hypotension and severity of acute takotsubo syndrome attacks [(A) acute left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), (B) peak N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) concentrations, and (C) peak troponin‐T concentrations]. All comparisons were made by non‐paired t‐tests, and p‐values are indicated on the figure.
Figure 2Evaluation of potential for ‘confounder’ status between parameters of severity of takotsubo syndrome attack [(A) correlation between acute left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and peak N‐terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) concentrations, and (B) correlation between acute LVEF and peak troponin‐T concentrations]. Data were analysed using Spearman's correlation coefficient, and significance levels are shown. Note that the upper limit of quantitation for the assay utilized to measure plasma concentrations of NT‐proBNP was 35 000 ng/L.
Figure 3Early hypotension/shock in takotsubo syndrome: postulated inotropic vs. non‐inotropic components of pathogenesis. Abbreviations: β2, β2 adrenoceptors; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; Gi, G‐inhibitory; Gs, G‐stimulatory; L‐NAME, L‐NG‐nitro‐arginine methyl ester (NOS inhibitor); MMPs, matrix metalloproteinases; NAD+, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; NO, nitric oxide; NOS, nitric oxide synthase; O2 −, superoxide; ONOO−, peroxynitrite; PARP‐1, poly [ADP‐ribose] polymerase 1; TXNIP, thioredoxin interacting protein.