Heather A Pines1,2, Shirley J Semple3, Carlos Magis-Rodríguez4, Alicia Harvey-Vera1,5, Steffanie A Strathdee1, Rudy Patrick1, Gudelia Rangel6,7, Thomas L Patterson3. 1. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. 2. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA. 4. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico. 5. Universidad Xochicalco, Tijuana, Mexico. 6. United States-Mexico Border Health Commission, Tijuana, Mexico. 7. El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, Tijuana, Mexico.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Efforts to increase HIV testing, diagnosis and care are critical to curbing HIV epidemics among cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). We compared the effectiveness of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) and venue-based sampling (VBS) for identifying previously undiagnosed HIV infection among MSM and TW in Tijuana, Mexico. METHODS: Between March 2015 and December 2018, we conducted RDS within the social networks of MSM and TW and VBS at venues frequented by MSM and TW to socialize and meet sexual partners. Those reached by RDS/VBS who reported at least 18 years of age, anal sex with MSM or TW, and no previous HIV diagnosis were eligible for HIV testing. RESULTS: Of those screened following recruitment via RDS (N = 1232; 98.6% MSM; 1.3% TW), 60.8% (749/1232) were eligible for HIV testing and 97.5% (730/749) were tested for HIV infection, which led to the identification of 36 newly diagnosed HIV infections (4.9%). Of those screened following recruitment via VBS (N = 2560; 95.2% MSM; 4.6% TW), 56.5% (1446/2560) were eligible for HIV testing and 92.8% (1342/1446) were tested for HIV infection, which led to the identification of 82 newly diagnosed HIV infections (6.1%). The proportion of new HIV diagnoses did not differ by recruitment method (ratio = 0.81, 95% confidence interval: 0.55 to 1.18). Compared to those recruited via RDS, those tested following recruitment via VBS were younger, more likely to identify as gay, and more likely to identify as TW. Compared to those recruited via VBS, those newly diagnosed with HIV infection following recruitment via RDS reported higher levels of internalized stigma and were more likely to report injection drug use and a history of deportation from the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Despite RDS and VBS being equally effective for identifying undiagnosed HIV infection, each recruitment method reached different subgroups of MSM and TW in Tijuana. Our findings suggest that there may be benefits to using both RDS and VBS to increase the identification of previously undiagnosed HIV infection and ultimately support HIV care engagement among MSM and TW in Mexico and other similar LMIC.
BACKGROUND: Efforts to increase HIV testing, diagnosis and care are critical to curbing HIV epidemics among cisgender men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women (TW) in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). We compared the effectiveness of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) and venue-based sampling (VBS) for identifying previously undiagnosed HIV infection among MSM and TW in Tijuana, Mexico. METHODS: Between March 2015 and December 2018, we conducted RDS within the social networks of MSM and TW and VBS at venues frequented by MSM and TW to socialize and meet sexual partners. Those reached by RDS/VBS who reported at least 18 years of age, anal sex with MSM or TW, and no previous HIV diagnosis were eligible for HIV testing. RESULTS: Of those screened following recruitment via RDS (N = 1232; 98.6% MSM; 1.3% TW), 60.8% (749/1232) were eligible for HIV testing and 97.5% (730/749) were tested for HIV infection, which led to the identification of 36 newly diagnosed HIV infections (4.9%). Of those screened following recruitment via VBS (N = 2560; 95.2% MSM; 4.6% TW), 56.5% (1446/2560) were eligible for HIV testing and 92.8% (1342/1446) were tested for HIV infection, which led to the identification of 82 newly diagnosed HIV infections (6.1%). The proportion of new HIV diagnoses did not differ by recruitment method (ratio = 0.81, 95% confidence interval: 0.55 to 1.18). Compared to those recruited via RDS, those tested following recruitment via VBS were younger, more likely to identify as gay, and more likely to identify as TW. Compared to those recruited via VBS, those newly diagnosed with HIV infection following recruitment via RDS reported higher levels of internalized stigma and were more likely to report injection drug use and a history of deportation from the United States. CONCLUSIONS: Despite RDS and VBS being equally effective for identifying undiagnosed HIV infection, each recruitment method reached different subgroups of MSM and TW in Tijuana. Our findings suggest that there may be benefits to using both RDS and VBS to increase the identification of previously undiagnosed HIV infection and ultimately support HIV care engagement among MSM and TW in Mexico and other similar LMIC.
Keywords:
HIV testing; Mexico; cisgender men who have sex with men; respondent-driven sampling; transgender women; undiagnosed HIV infection; venue-based sampling
Authors: Chongyi Wei; Willi McFarland; Grant N Colfax; Vincent Fuqua; H Fisher Raymond Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2012-06-29 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: J M Ellen; D H McCree; R Muvva; S-E Chung; R M Miazad; R Arrington-Sanders; K Jones; P Burnett; C Fichtenberg Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Victoria D Ojeda; Amy Eppstein; Remedios Lozada; Adriana C Vargas-Ojeda; Steffanie A Strathdee; David Goodman; Jose L Burgos Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2014-06
Authors: Andrew N Phillips; Valentina Cambiano; Fumiyo Nakagawa; Loveleen Bansi-Matharu; David Wilson; Ilesh Jani; Tsitsi Apollo; Mark Sculpher; Timothy Hallett; Cliff Kerr; Joep J van Oosterhout; Jeffrey W Eaton; Janne Estill; Brian Williams; Naoko Doi; Frances Cowan; Olivia Keiser; Deborah Ford; Karin Hatzold; Ruanne Barnabas; Helen Ayles; Gesine Meyer-Rath; Lisa Nelson; Cheryl Johnson; Rachel Baggaley; Ade Fakoya; Andreas Jahn; Paul Revill Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: James Young; Aidan Ablona; Benjamin J Klassen; Rob Higgins; John Kim; Stephanie Lavoie; Rod Knight; Nathan J Lachowsky Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-05-31 Impact factor: 4.135