OBJECTIVES: The authors explored whether respondent-driven sampling (RDS) can generate a more diverse sample of black men who have sex with men (MSM) than time-location sampling (TLS) by comparing sample characteristics accrued by each method in two independent studies. METHODS: The first study exclusively recruited black MSM through RDS (N=256), while the second recruited MSM through TLS including a subsample of black MSM (N=69). Crude and adjusted point estimates and 95% CIs were calculated for socio-demographic and behavioural characteristics, HIV prevalence and prevalence of unrecognised infections, and were compared using the Z-test. RESULTS: The samples differed significantly regarding all socio-demographic and some behavioural characteristics. Compared with TLS, RDS estimated higher proportions of older, less educated, poorer, currently homeless and self-identified bisexual black MSM. Participants in RDS were less likely to have a main partner, had fewer male partners, were more likely to have a female partner and have both male and female partners, and reported greater methamphetamine, crack and heroin use. Prevalence of HIV and unrecognised infections were slightly higher among RDS participants. CONCLUSIONS: The RDS sample comprised black MSM who were more diverse with respect to socio-demographic characteristics and may also be at higher risk for HIV. Thus, RDS has advantages in reaching higher risk black MSM who are most hidden from intervention research and service delivery. Future studies of black MSM using RDS could use steering strategies to recruit younger participants and other subgroups of greatest interest to public health and prevention.
OBJECTIVES: The authors explored whether respondent-driven sampling (RDS) can generate a more diverse sample of black men who have sex with men (MSM) than time-location sampling (TLS) by comparing sample characteristics accrued by each method in two independent studies. METHODS: The first study exclusively recruited black MSM through RDS (N=256), while the second recruited MSM through TLS including a subsample of black MSM (N=69). Crude and adjusted point estimates and 95% CIs were calculated for socio-demographic and behavioural characteristics, HIV prevalence and prevalence of unrecognised infections, and were compared using the Z-test. RESULTS: The samples differed significantly regarding all socio-demographic and some behavioural characteristics. Compared with TLS, RDS estimated higher proportions of older, less educated, poorer, currently homeless and self-identified bisexual black MSM. Participants in RDS were less likely to have a main partner, had fewer male partners, were more likely to have a female partner and have both male and female partners, and reported greater methamphetamine, crack and heroin use. Prevalence of HIV and unrecognised infections were slightly higher among RDS participants. CONCLUSIONS: The RDS sample comprised black MSM who were more diverse with respect to socio-demographic characteristics and may also be at higher risk for HIV. Thus, RDS has advantages in reaching higher risk black MSM who are most hidden from intervention research and service delivery. Future studies of black MSM using RDS could use steering strategies to recruit younger participants and other subgroups of greatest interest to public health and prevention.
Authors: Carl Kendall; Ligia R F S Kerr; Rogerio C Gondim; Guilherme L Werneck; Raimunda Hermelinda Maia Macena; Marta Kerr Pontes; Lisa G Johnston; Keith Sabin; Willi McFarland Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2008-04-04
Authors: Willi McFarland; Yea-Hung Chen; H Fisher Raymond; Binh Nguyen; Grant Colfax; Jason Mehrtens; Tyler Robertson; Ron Stall; Deb Levine; Hong-Ha M Truong Journal: AIDS Care Date: 2011-03
Authors: Willi McFarland; Yea-Hung Chen; Binh Nguyen; Michael Grasso; Deb Levine; Ron Stall; Grant Colfax; Tyler Robertson; Hong-Ha M Truong; H Fisher Raymond Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2012-01
Authors: Duncan A MacKellar; Kathleen M Gallagher; Teresa Finlayson; Travis Sanchez; Amy Lansky; Patrick S Sullivan Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Vincent Fuqua; Yea-Hung Chen; Tracey Packer; Teri Dowling; Theresa O Ick; Binh Nguyen; Grant N Colfax; H Fisher Raymond Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2012-02
Authors: Hoang Vu Tran; Linh-Vi N Le; Lisa Grazina Johnston; Patrick Nadol; Anh Van Do; Ha Thi Thanh Tran; Tuan Anh Nguyen Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Manya Magnus; Julie Franks; Sam Griffith; Michael P Arnold; Krista Goodman; Darrell P Wheeler Journal: J Public Health Manag Pract Date: 2014 Nov-Dec
Authors: Lisa M Kuhns; Soyang Kwon; Daniel T Ryan; Robert Garofalo; Gregory Phillips; Brian S Mustanski Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: William M Miller; William C Miller; Clare Barrington; Sharon S Weir; Sanny Y Chen; Michael E Emch; Audrey E Pettifor; Gabriela Paz-Bailey Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-12
Authors: J L Clark; K A Konda; A Silva-Santisteban; J Peinado; J R Lama; L Kusunoki; A Perez-Brumer; M Pun; R Cabello; J L Sebastian; L Suarez-Ognio; J Sanchez Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2014-12