Literature DB >> 33758969

Potentially actionable pharmacogenetic variants and symptom control medications in oncology.

Jai N Patel1, Danielle Boselli2, Elizabeth J Jandrisevits3, Issam S Hamadeh3, Ahmed Salem3, Patrick Meadors4, Declan Walsh5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We estimated the prevalence of potentially actionable pharmacogenetic (PGx) variants related to symptom control medications (SCMs) based on institutional prescribing patterns and correlated presenting symptoms with SCM prescribing.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult ambulatory cancer patients undergoing electronic distress screening (EDS) within 90 days of intake to the cancer hospital. We estimated the proportion prescribed SCM(s) with PGx evidence within 90 days of intake. Those with potentially actionable variants were estimated using population frequency data from 1000 genomes. The expected number at risk of altered drug response was estimated. The associations between symptom scores and SCM(s) were estimated with logistic regression and threshold analyses performed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
RESULTS: Of 6985 patients, 3222 (46%) received ≥ one SCM. Of these, 2760 (86%) received SCM(s) with PGx evidence for CYP2B6, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, or SLC6A4; 2719 (84%) received a drug metabolized by CYP2D6, most commonly hydrocodone (40.4%), ondansetron (35.6%), oxycodone (24.2%), and/or tramadol (7.1%). Based on this, about one quarter were expected to have altered metabolism and/or drug response. One third were prescribed two or more SCMs with PGx evidence. About half reported at least one severe symptom, which significantly correlated with SCM prescribing (p < 0.001). Threshold scores were identified that highly correlated with SCM prescribing for anxiety, depression, nausea, neuropathy, pain, and sleep.
CONCLUSION: About half presented with significant symptom burden, which highly correlated with SCM prescribing. Most received SCMs with PGx evidence. Preemptive PGx testing for these variants should be evaluated in prospective trials to evaluate the impact on symptom control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medications; Palliative medicine; Pharmacogenetics; Pharmacogenomics; Supportive care; Symptoms

Year:  2021        PMID: 33758969     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06170-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  19 in total

1.  CPIC: Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium of the Pharmacogenomics Research Network.

Authors:  M V Relling; T E Klein
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  What is the evidence that palliative care teams improve outcomes for cancer patients and their families?

Authors:  Irene J Higginson; Catherine J Evans
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.360

Review 3.  Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guideline for CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 Genotypes and Dosing of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors.

Authors:  J K Hicks; J R Bishop; K Sangkuhl; D J Müller; Y Ji; S G Leckband; J S Leeder; R L Graham; D L Chiulli; A LLerena; T C Skaar; S A Scott; J C Stingl; T E Klein; K E Caudle; A Gaedigk
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 6.875

4.  Supporting commission on cancer-mandated psychosocial distress screening with implementation strategies.

Authors:  Mark Lazenby; Elizabeth Ercolano; Marcia Grant; Jimmie C Holland; Paul B Jacobsen; Ruth McCorkle
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 5.  Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guideline for CYP2D6 genotype and use of ondansetron and tropisetron.

Authors:  G C Bell; K E Caudle; M Whirl-Carrillo; R J Gordon; K Hikino; C A Prows; A Gaedigk; Jag Agundez; S Sadhasivam; T E Klein; M Schwab
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer S Temel; Joseph A Greer; Alona Muzikansky; Emily R Gallagher; Sonal Admane; Vicki A Jackson; Constance M Dahlin; Craig D Blinderman; Juliet Jacobsen; William F Pirl; J Andrew Billings; Thomas J Lynch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Personalizing supportive care in oncology patients using pharmacogenetic-driven treatment pathways.

Authors:  Rebecca L Andersen; Daniel J Johnson; Jai N Patel
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 2.533

8.  Baseline quality of life as a prognostic indicator of survival: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from EORTC clinical trials.

Authors:  Chantal Quinten; Corneel Coens; Murielle Mauer; Sylvie Comte; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Charles Cleeland; David Osoba; Kristin Bjordal; Andrew Bottomley
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Optimal pain management for patients with cancer in the modern era.

Authors:  Bethann M Scarborough; Cardinale B Smith
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 10.  Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines for cytochrome P450 2D6 genotype and codeine therapy: 2014 update.

Authors:  K R Crews; A Gaedigk; H M Dunnenberger; J S Leeder; T E Klein; K E Caudle; C E Haidar; D D Shen; J T Callaghan; S Sadhasivam; C A Prows; E D Kharasch; T C Skaar
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 6.875

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.