| Literature DB >> 33758631 |
Yi Zhang1,2, Ziyue Wang1,2, Yu Cao1,2, Lifu Zhang1,2, Guan Wang1,2, Fangjie Dong3, Ren Deng4, Baogen Guo5, Li Zeng6, Peng Wang7, Ruimei Dai8, Yu Ran1,2, Wenyi Lyu1,2, Peiwen Miao9, Steven Su10.
Abstract
Hospitalisation risks for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been attributed to ambient air pollution worldwide. However, a rise in COPD hospitalisations may indicate a considerable increase in fatality rate in public health. The current study focuses on the association between consecutive ambient air pollution (CAAP) and COPD hospitalisation to offer predictable early guidance towards estimates of COPD hospital admissions in the event of consecutive exposure to air pollution. Big data analytics were collected from 3-year time series recordings (from 2015 to 2017) of both air data and COPD hospitalisation data in the Chengdu region in China. Based on the combined effects of CAAP and unit increase in air pollutant concentrations, a quasi-Poisson regression model was established, which revealed the association between CAAP and estimated COPD admissions. The results show the dynamics and outbreaks in the variations in COPD admissions in response to CAAP. Cross-validation and mean squared error (MSE) are applied to validate the goodness of fit. In both short-term and long-term air pollution exposures, Z test outcomes show that the COPD hospitalisation risk is greater for men than for women; similarly, the occurrence of COPD hospital admissions in the group of elderly people (> 65 years old) is significantly larger than that in lower age groups. The time lag between the air quality and COPD hospitalisation is also investigated, and a peak of COPD hospitalisation risk is found to lag 2 days for air quality index (AQI) and PM10, and 1 day for PM2.5. The big data-based predictive paradigm would be a measure for the early detection of a public health event in post-COVID-19. The study findings can also provide guidance for COPD admissions in the event of consecutive exposure to air pollution in the Chengdu region.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollutant concentration; Big data analytics; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Consecutive ambient air pollution; Hospital admission
Year: 2021 PMID: 33758631 PMCID: PMC7971392 DOI: 10.1007/s11869-021-00998-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Air Qual Atmos Health ISSN: 1873-9318 Impact factor: 3.763
Fig. 1The locations and numbers of air pollutant monitoring stations and public hospitals in Chengdu. The red star indicates 8 real-time monitoring stations in meteorological observatories, i.e., Sanwa Kiln, Shilidian, Junping Street, Liangjiaxiang, Shahepu, Lingyan Temple, Caotang Temple, and Jinquan Lianghe. The colour bar represents the number of public hospitals in CBD, suburbs, and townships in Chengdu (Zhang et al. 2020).
Technical regulation on ambient air quality (#HJ633-2012) followed by AAQSC-2012 and implemented from January 1, 2016
| AQI | AQI level | Pollution level | Health impact | Suggestions and measures |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0~50 | 1 | Good | None of health implications | Normal outdoor activities |
| 51~100 | 2 | Moderate | Air quality is acceptable, but may have weak health impacts for allergic people | Outdoor activities should be limited for the small groups of allergic people |
| 101~150 | 3 | Lightly polluted | Mild exacerbation and irritating symptoms are occurred in susceptible and healthy people, respectively | Children, elders, and patients who suffer from heart or respiratory problems should reduce long-time, high-intensity outdoor activities |
| 151~200 | 4 | Moderately polluted | Further exacerbated in susceptible groups, and may influence the cardiorespiratory system of healthy people | Children, elders, and patients who suffer from heart or respiratory problems should avoid long-time, high-intensity outdoor activities; moderate reductions of outdoor activities for normal people |
| 200~300 | 5 | Heavily polluted | Symptoms for cardiorespiratory patients are significantly exacerbated, and commonly appeared in healthy people | Children, elders, and patients who suffer from heart or respiratory problems should stay at an indoor environment, and stop outdoor activities; normal people reduce outdoor activities |
| > 300 | 6 | Severely polluted | Healthy people have strong symptoms and decrease exercise tolerance; earlier appearance for underlying diseases | Children, elders, and patients who suffer from heart or respiratory problems should stay at an indoor environment and avoid physical activities; normal people avoid outdoor activities |
Spearman correlation analysis across key ambient air pollutants in terms of short- and long-term effects of CAAP
| Variables | CAAP durative days | |
|---|---|---|
| Short-term (2~9 days) | Long-term (10~28 days) | |
| PM2.5 and AQI | 0.876** | 0.848** |
| PM10 and AQI | 0.869** | 0.835** |
| NO | 0.436** | 0.369** |
| SO | 0.266** | − 0.116 |
| CO and AQI | 0.684** | 0.437** |
| O3 and AQI | − 0.316** | − 0.208 |
**p < 0.01
Statistical results of gender, age, air pollutant concentrations, and cause-specific COPDs with ambient air pollution conditions based on the total 3-year (2015–2017) air data and hospital admission data recordings in Chengdu
| Category | Quantities | Percentage in the total three-year dataset (%) | Category** | Quantities | Percentage in the total three-year dataset (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 65104 | 58.26 | J44.0 | 4019 | 3.60 |
| Female | 46636 | 41.74 | J44.1 | 72609 | 64.98 | |
| Age (years old) | < 44 | 686 | 0.61 | J44.101 | 17924 | 16.04 |
| 45–64 | 19819 | 17.74 | J44.8 | 182 | 0.16 | |
| ≥ 65 | 91235 | 81.65 | J44.801 and J44.803 | 5204 | 4.66 | |
| Days of air pollutant concentrations exceed the polluted level* | AQI | 303 | 27.67 | J44.802 and J44.804 | 2431 | 2.18 |
| NO2 (ug/m3) | 52 | 4.75 | J44.805 | 179 | 0.16 | |
| PM2.5 (ug/m3) | 245 | 22.37 | J44.806 | 273 | 0.24 | |
| PM10 (ug/m3) | 175 | 15.98 | J44.9 | 8919 | 7.98 | |
| SO2 (ug/m3) | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | |
| CO (ug/m3) | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | |
*The statistical results were calculated by averaging the daily ambient air pollutant concentration data reached AQI level 3 referred to Table 1
**The cause-specific COPD codes refer to the ICD code released in 2013
Descriptive statistics for both ambient air pollutant and COPD hospitalisation data in the condition of CAAP
| Air pollutants | Pollution criteria* | Mean ± SD | Low interval (95% CI) | Upper interval (95% CI) | Minimum | Median | Maximum | Interquartile range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQI | 100 | 149.36 ± 45.58 | 144.21 | 154.51 | 100 | 135.3 | 368.2 | 63.12 |
| NO2 (ug/m3) | 80 | 66.70 ± 14.03 | 65.12 | 68.28 | 30.9 | 64.8 | 118 | 16.95 |
| O3 (ug/m3) | - | 108.05 ± 60.22 | 101.24 | 114.86 | 23.2 | 94.5 | 289.8 | 85.07 |
| PM2.5 (ug/m3) | 75 | 108.18 ± 39.70 | 103.69 | 112.66 | 40.2 | 98.1 | 296.6 | 51.84 |
| PM10 (ug/m3) | 150 | 172.13 ± 57.65 | 165.61 | 178.65 | 85.4 | 159.6 | 450.0 | 68.29 |
| SO2 (ug/m3) | 150 | 18.71 ± 5.40 | 18.10 | 19.32 | 9.2 | 18.1 | 37.1 | 7.96 |
| CO (ug/m3) | 10 | 0.92 ± 0.36 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0 | 0.88 | 2.18 | 0.30 |
| Cause-specific COPD | COPD code | |||||||
| COPD with acute lower respiratory tract infection | J44.0 | 13.3 ± 8.4 | 12.3 | 14.2 | 1 | 11 | 44 | 10 |
| COPD with acute exacerbation | J44.1 | 239.6 ± 151.6 | 222.5 | 256.8 | 29 | 206 | 760 | 162 |
| Chronic obstructive emphysema bronchitis with acute exacerbation | J44.101 | 59.2 ± 31.3 | 55.6 | 62.7 | 7 | 60 | 183 | 47.5 |
| Other specified COPD | J44.8 | 0.6 ± 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 1 |
| Chronic bronchitis with emphysema | J44.801 and J44.803 | 17.2 ± 13.7 | 15.6 | 18.7 | 0 | 14 | 65 | 10.5 |
| Chronic asthmatic bronchitis | J44.802 and J44.804 | 8.0 ± 4.6 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 0 | 8 | 22 | 7 |
| Chronic bronchiolitis | J44.805 | 0.6 ± 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Chronic obstructive bronchitis | J44.806 | 0.9 ± 1.2 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Unspecified COPD | J44.9 | 29.4 ± 18.7 | 27.3 | 31.5 | 1 | 26 | 110 | 20 |
*The pollution criteria referred to AQI level 3 shown in Table 1
The COPD-related results were based on daily quantities of COPD admissions on the days when the pollution criteria were attained.
Fig. 2Estimates of changes in COPD admissions in response to CAAP days. The percentage change (%) in daily hospitalisation was calculated by dividing the number of COPD admissions on certain CAAP day by the number of COPD admissions on the first CAAP day. For instance, the percentage change in the 10th CAAP day was a ratio of the number of admissions on the 10th CAAP day over that on the first CAAP day
MSE (mean squared error) for cross-validation of the regression model
| Ambient air pollutants | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Mean of MSE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQI | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 0.06 |
| PM2.5 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.04 |
| PM10 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.03 |
Fig. 3The estimates of COPD admissions (in comparison to the real COPD records). The estimated outcomes were based on the quasi-Poisson regression model with CAAP, and the real outcomes were given from the Chengdu 3-year databases for both CAAP and COPD hospitalisations
Fig. 4Associations between PM2.5/PM10/AQI concentrations and COPD hospitalisations in short-term (2–9 CAAP days) and long-term (10–18 CAAP days) effects by age and gender using a single air pollutant model with a lag of 2 days (lag2)
Fig. 5Averaged percentage change (%) in daily COPD admissions per 10-unit increase in PM2.5, PM10, and AQI concentrations on different lag days in Chengdu city, 2015–2017. For instance, lag1 represented that the COPD data of the candidate day paired with 1 day’s air pollutant concentration data lagged 1 day behind the day of the air pollutant concentration data; lag2 denoted 2 days after