Andrew Donkor1,2, Tim Luckett3, Sanchia Aranda4, Verna Vanderpuye5, Jane L Phillips3. 1. IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. Andrew.Donkor@uts.edu.au. 2. National Centre for Radiotherapy, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana. Andrew.Donkor@uts.edu.au. 3. IMPACCT (Improving Palliative, Aged and Chronic Care through Clinical Research and Translation), Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 4. Faculty of Health and CEO, Cancer Council Australia, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. 5. National Centre for Radiotherapy, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improving access to radiotherapy services in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is challenging. Many LMICs' radiotherapy initiatives fail because of multi-faceted barriers leading to significant wastage of scarce resources. Supporting LMICs to self-assess their readiness for establishing radiotherapy services will help to improve cancer outcomes by ensuring safe, effective and sustainable evidenced-based cancer care. The aim of the study was to develop practical guidance for LMICs on self-assessing their readiness to establish safe and sustainable radiotherapy services. METHODS: The Access to Radiotherapy for Cancer treatment (ARC) Project was a pragmatic sequential mixed qualitative methods design underpinned by the World Health Organisation's 'Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions Framework' and 'Health System Building Blocks Framework for Action' conceptual frameworks. This paper reports on the process of overall data integration and meta-inference from previously published components comprising a systematic review and two-part qualitative study (semi-structured interviews and a participant validation process). The meta-inferences enabled a series of radiotherapy readiness self-assessment requirements to be generated, formalised as a REadiness SElf-Assessment (RESEA) Guide' for use by LMICs. FINDINGS: The meta-inferences identified a large number of factors that acted as facilitators and/or barriers, depending on the situation, which include: awareness and advocacy; political leadership; epidemiological data; financial resources; basic physical infrastructure; radiation safety legislative and regulatory framework; project management; and radiotherapy workforce training and education. 'Commitment', 'cooperation', 'capacity' and 'catalyst' were identified as the key domains enabling development of radiotherapy services. Across these four domains, the RESEA Guide included 37 requirements and 120 readiness questions that LMICs need to consider and answer as part of establishing a new radiotherapy service. CONCLUSIONS: The RESEA Guide provides a new resource for LMICs to self-assess their capacity to establish safe and sustainable radiotherapy services. Future evaluation of the acceptability and feasibility of the RESEA Guide is needed to inform its validity. Further work, including field study, is needed to inform further refinements. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses are required to reduce the data set and test the fit of the four-factor structure (commitment, cooperation, capacity and catalyst) found in the current study.
BACKGROUND: Improving access to radiotherapy services in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) is challenging. Many LMICs' radiotherapy initiatives fail because of multi-faceted barriers leading to significant wastage of scarce resources. Supporting LMICs to self-assess their readiness for establishing radiotherapy services will help to improve cancer outcomes by ensuring safe, effective and sustainable evidenced-based cancer care. The aim of the study was to develop practical guidance for LMICs on self-assessing their readiness to establish safe and sustainable radiotherapy services. METHODS: The Access to Radiotherapy for Cancer treatment (ARC) Project was a pragmatic sequential mixed qualitative methods design underpinned by the World Health Organisation's 'Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions Framework' and 'Health System Building Blocks Framework for Action' conceptual frameworks. This paper reports on the process of overall data integration and meta-inference from previously published components comprising a systematic review and two-part qualitative study (semi-structured interviews and a participant validation process). The meta-inferences enabled a series of radiotherapy readiness self-assessment requirements to be generated, formalised as a REadiness SElf-Assessment (RESEA) Guide' for use by LMICs. FINDINGS: The meta-inferences identified a large number of factors that acted as facilitators and/or barriers, depending on the situation, which include: awareness and advocacy; political leadership; epidemiological data; financial resources; basic physical infrastructure; radiation safety legislative and regulatory framework; project management; and radiotherapy workforce training and education. 'Commitment', 'cooperation', 'capacity' and 'catalyst' were identified as the key domains enabling development of radiotherapy services. Across these four domains, the RESEA Guide included 37 requirements and 120 readiness questions that LMICs need to consider and answer as part of establishing a new radiotherapy service. CONCLUSIONS: The RESEA Guide provides a new resource for LMICs to self-assess their capacity to establish safe and sustainable radiotherapy services. Future evaluation of the acceptability and feasibility of the RESEA Guide is needed to inform its validity. Further work, including field study, is needed to inform further refinements. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses are required to reduce the data set and test the fit of the four-factor structure (commitment, cooperation, capacity and catalyst) found in the current study.
Entities:
Keywords:
Assessment; Establishment; Low and middle-income countries; Radiotherapy; Readiness; Sustainable
Authors: Rifat Atun; David A Jaffray; Michael B Barton; Freddie Bray; Michael Baumann; Bhadrasain Vikram; Timothy P Hanna; Felicia M Knaul; Yolande Lievens; Tracey Y M Lui; Michael Milosevic; Brian O'Sullivan; Danielle L Rodin; Eduardo Rosenblatt; Jacob Van Dyk; Mei Ling Yap; Eduardo Zubizarreta; Mary Gospodarowicz Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Svea Closser; Kelly Cox; Thomas M Parris; R Matthew Landis; Judith Justice; Ranjani Gopinath; Kenneth Maes; Hailom Banteyerga Amaha; Ismaila Zango Mohammed; Aminu Mohammed Dukku; Patricia A Omidian; Emma Varley; Pauley Tedoff; Adam D Koon; Laetitia Nyirazinyoye; Matthew A Luck; W Frank Pont; Vanessa Neergheen; Anat Rosenthal; Peter Nsubuga; Naveen Thacker; Rashid Jooma; Elizabeth Nuttall Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2014-04-01 Impact factor: 5.226