Literature DB >> 26419354

Expanding global access to radiotherapy.

Rifat Atun1, David A Jaffray2, Michael B Barton3, Freddie Bray4, Michael Baumann5, Bhadrasain Vikram6, Timothy P Hanna7, Felicia M Knaul8, Yolande Lievens9, Tracey Y M Lui10, Michael Milosevic11, Brian O'Sullivan12, Danielle L Rodin13, Eduardo Rosenblatt14, Jacob Van Dyk15, Mei Ling Yap3, Eduardo Zubizarreta16, Mary Gospodarowicz12.   

Abstract

Radiotherapy is a critical and inseparable component of comprehensive cancer treatment and care. For many of the most common cancers in low-income and middle-income countries, radiotherapy is essential for effective treatment. In high-income countries, radiotherapy is used in more than half of all cases of cancer to cure localised disease, palliate symptoms, and control disease in incurable cancers. Yet, in planning and building treatment capacity for cancer, radiotherapy is frequently the last resource to be considered. Consequently, worldwide access to radiotherapy is unacceptably low. We present a new body of evidence that quantifies the worldwide coverage of radiotherapy services by country. We show the shortfall in access to radiotherapy by country and globally for 2015-35 based on current and projected need, and show substantial health and economic benefits to investing in radiotherapy. The cost of scaling up radiotherapy in the nominal model in 2015-35 is US$26·6 billion in low-income countries, $62·6 billion in lower-middle-income countries, and $94·8 billion in upper-middle-income countries, which amounts to $184·0 billion across all low-income and middle-income countries. In the efficiency model the costs were lower: $14·1 billion in low-income, $33·3 billion in lower-middle-income, and $49·4 billion in upper-middle-income countries-a total of $96·8 billion. Scale-up of radiotherapy capacity in 2015-35 from current levels could lead to saving of 26·9 million life-years in low-income and middle-income countries over the lifetime of the patients who received treatment. The economic benefits of investment in radiotherapy are very substantial. Using the nominal cost model could produce a net benefit of $278·1 billion in 2015-35 ($265·2 million in low-income countries, $38·5 billion in lower-middle-income countries, and $239·3 billion in upper-middle-income countries). Investment in the efficiency model would produce in the same period an even greater total benefit of $365·4 billion ($12·8 billion in low-income countries, $67·7 billion in lower-middle-income countries, and $284·7 billion in upper-middle-income countries). The returns, by the human-capital approach, are projected to be less with the nominal cost model, amounting to $16·9 billion in 2015-35 (-$14·9 billion in low-income countries; -$18·7 billion in lower-middle-income countries, and $50·5 billion in upper-middle-income countries). The returns with the efficiency model were projected to be greater, however, amounting to $104·2 billion (-$2·4 billion in low-income countries, $10·7 billion in lower-middle-income countries, and $95·9 billion in upper-middle-income countries). Our results provide compelling evidence that investment in radiotherapy not only enables treatment of large numbers of cancer cases to save lives, but also brings positive economic benefits.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26419354     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00222-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  178 in total

1.  The state of oncology in Malawi in 2015.

Authors:  Leo Masamba
Journal:  Malawi Med J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.875

2.  Hypofractionated radiotherapy in the real-world setting: An international ESTRO-GIRO survey.

Authors:  Danielle Rodin; Bouchra Tawk; Osama Mohamad; Surbhi Grover; Fabio Y Moraes; Mei Ling Yap; Eduardo Zubizarreta; Yolande Lievens
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  The Radiation Stress Response: Of the People, By the People and For the People.

Authors:  C Norman Coleman
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 4.  Clinical Development of Novel Drug-Radiotherapy Combinations.

Authors:  Saif S Ahmad; Marka R Crittenden; Phuoc T Tran; Paul G Kluetz; Gideon M Blumenthal; Helen Bulbeck; Richard D Baird; Kaye J Williams; Tim Illidge; Stephen M Hahn; Theodore S Lawrence; Patricia A Spears; Amanda J Walker; Ricky A Sharma
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Scale-up of radiotherapy for cervical cancer in the era of human papillomavirus vaccination in low-income and middle-income countries: a model-based analysis of need and economic impact.

Authors:  Danielle Rodin; Emily A Burger; Rifat Atun; Michael Barton; Mary Gospodarowicz; Surbhi Grover; Timothy P Hanna; David A Jaffray; Felicia M Knaul; Yolande Lievens; Eduardo Zubizarreta; Michael Milosevic
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 6.  Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Michael Baumann; Mechthild Krause; Jens Overgaard; Jürgen Debus; Søren M Bentzen; Juliane Daartz; Christian Richter; Daniel Zips; Thomas Bortfeld
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000-14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries.

Authors:  Claudia Allemani; Tomohiro Matsuda; Veronica Di Carlo; Rhea Harewood; Melissa Matz; Maja Nikšić; Audrey Bonaventure; Mikhail Valkov; Christopher J Johnson; Jacques Estève; Olufemi J Ogunbiyi; Gulnar Azevedo E Silva; Wan-Qing Chen; Sultan Eser; Gerda Engholm; Charles A Stiller; Alain Monnereau; Ryan R Woods; Otto Visser; Gek Hsiang Lim; Joanne Aitken; Hannah K Weir; Michel P Coleman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Radiotherapy infrastructure and human resources in Switzerland : Present status and projected computations for 2020.

Authors:  Niloy Ranjan Datta; Shaka Khan; Dietmar Marder; Daniel Zwahlen; Stephan Bodis
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  The role and contribution of treatment and imaging modalities in global cervical cancer management: survival estimates from a simulation-based analysis.

Authors:  Zachary J Ward; Surbhi Grover; Andrew M Scott; Sungmin Woo; Dina H Salama; Elizabeth C Jones; Tarek El-Diasty; Bradley R Pieters; Edward L Trimble; H Alberto Vargas; Hedvig Hricak; Rifat Atun
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 41.316

10.  Estimating the impact of treatment and imaging modalities on 5-year net survival of 11 cancers in 200 countries: a simulation-based analysis.

Authors:  Zachary J Ward; Andrew M Scott; Hedvig Hricak; May Abdel-Wahab; Diana Paez; Miriam Mikhail Lette; H Alberto Vargas; T Peter Kingham; Rifat Atun
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 41.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.