Javier Garrigós-Martínez1, Kiira Vuoristo2, Miguel Angel Nieto-Taype1, Juha Tähtiharju2, Jaana Uusitalo2, Pauliina Tukiainen2, Christian Schmid3,4, Ilya Tolstorukov5, Knut Madden6, Merja Penttilä2, José Luis Montesinos-Seguí1, Francisco Valero1, Anton Glieder7,8, Xavier Garcia-Ortega1. 1. Department of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain. 2. Solutions for Natural Resources and Environment, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd, Tietotie 2, Espoo, Finland. 3. Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 14, 8010, Graz, Austria. 4. Bisy GmbH, Wuenschendorf 292, 8200, Hofstaetten/Raab, Austria. 5. Keck Graduate Institute, 535 Watson Dr, Claremont, CA, USA. 6. Biogrammatics Inc, 2794 Loker Ave, West, Suite 103, Carlsbad, CA, 92010, USA. 7. Institute of Molecular Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 14, 8010, Graz, Austria. a.glieder@tugraz.at. 8. Bisy GmbH, Wuenschendorf 292, 8200, Hofstaetten/Raab, Austria. a.glieder@tugraz.at.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pichia pastoris is a powerful and broadly used host for recombinant protein production (RPP), where past bioprocess performance has often been directed with the methanol regulated AOX1 promoter (PAOX1), and the constitutive GAP promoter (PGAP). Since promoters play a crucial role in an expression system and the bioprocess efficiency, innovative alternatives are constantly developed and implemented. Here, a thorough comparative kinetic characterization of two expression systems based on the commercial PDF and UPP promoters (PPDF, PUPP) was first conducted in chemostat cultures. Most promising conditions were subsequently tested in fed-batch cultivations. These new alternatives were compared with the classical strong promoter PGAP, using the Candida antarctica lipase B (CalB) as model protein for expression system performance. RESULTS: Both the PPDF and PUPP-based expression systems outperformed similar PGAP-based expression in chemostat cultivations, reaching ninefold higher specific production rates (qp). CALB transcription levels were drastically higher when employing the novel expression systems. This higher expression was also correlated with a marked upregulation of unfolded protein response (UPR) related genes, likely from an increased protein burden in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Based on the chemostat results obtained, best culture strategies for both PPDF and PUPP expression systems were also successfully implemented in 15 L fed-batch cultivations where qp and product to biomass yield (YP/X*) values were similar than those obtained in chemostat cultivations. CONCLUSIONS: As an outcome of the macrokinetic characterization presented, the novel PPDF and PUPP were observed to offer much higher efficiency for CalB production than the widely used PGAP-based methanol-free alternative. Thus, both systems arise as highly productive alternatives for P. pastoris-based RPP bioprocesses. Furthermore, the different expression regulation patterns observed indicate the level of gene expression can be adjusted, or tuned, which is interesting when using Pichia pastoris as a cell factory for different products of interest.
BACKGROUND:Pichia pastoris is a powerful and broadly used host for recombinant protein production (RPP), where past bioprocess performance has often been directed with the methanol regulated AOX1 promoter (PAOX1), and the constitutive GAP promoter (PGAP). Since promoters play a crucial role in an expression system and the bioprocess efficiency, innovative alternatives are constantly developed and implemented. Here, a thorough comparative kinetic characterization of two expression systems based on the commercial PDF and UPP promoters (PPDF, PUPP) was first conducted in chemostat cultures. Most promising conditions were subsequently tested in fed-batch cultivations. These new alternatives were compared with the classical strong promoter PGAP, using the Candida antarctica lipase B (CalB) as model protein for expression system performance. RESULTS: Both the PPDF and PUPP-based expression systems outperformed similar PGAP-based expression in chemostat cultivations, reaching ninefold higher specific production rates (qp). CALB transcription levels were drastically higher when employing the novel expression systems. This higher expression was also correlated with a marked upregulation of unfolded protein response (UPR) related genes, likely from an increased protein burden in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Based on the chemostat results obtained, best culture strategies for both PPDF and PUPPexpression systems were also successfully implemented in 15 L fed-batch cultivations where qp and product to biomass yield (YP/X*) values were similar than those obtained in chemostat cultivations. CONCLUSIONS: As an outcome of the macrokinetic characterization presented, the novel PPDF and PUPP were observed to offer much higher efficiency for CalB production than the widely used PGAP-based methanol-free alternative. Thus, both systems arise as highly productive alternatives for P. pastoris-based RPP bioprocesses. Furthermore, the different expression regulation patterns observed indicate the level of gene expression can be adjusted, or tuned, which is interesting when using Pichia pastoris as a cell factory for different products of interest.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bioprocess development; Expression system characterisation; Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris); Methanol-free bioprocesses; Promoter regulation; Recombinant protein production
Authors: V Looser; B Bruhlmann; F Bumbak; C Stenger; M Costa; A Camattari; D Fotiadis; K Kovar Journal: Biotechnol Adv Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 14.227
Authors: David A Peña; Brigitte Gasser; Jürgen Zanghellini; Matthias G Steiger; Diethard Mattanovich Journal: Metab Eng Date: 2018-04-25 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Arnau Gasset; Xavier Garcia-Ortega; Javier Garrigós-Martínez; Francisco Valero; José Luis Montesinos-Seguí Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol Date: 2022-01-26