| Literature DB >> 33755270 |
Kilian Hett1, Ilwoo Lyu1, Paula Trujillo2, Alexander M Lopez2, Megan Aumann2, Kathleen E Larson1, Peter Hedera2,3, Benoit Dawant1, Bennett A Landman1, Daniel O Claassen2, Ipek Oguz1.
Abstract
Voxel-based morphometry is an established technique to study focal structural brain differences in neurologic disease. More recently, texture-based analysis methods have enabled a pattern-based assessment of group differences, at the patch level rather than at the voxel level, allowing a more sensitive localization of structural differences between patient populations. In this study, we propose a texture-based approach to identify structural differences between the cerebellum of patients with Parkinson's disease (n = 280) and essential tremor (n = 109). We analyzed anatomical differences of the cerebellum among patients using two features: T1-weighted MRI intensity, and a texture-based similarity feature. Our results show anatomical differences between groups that are localized to the inferior part of the cerebellar cortex. Both the T1-weighted intensity and texture showed differences in lobules VIII and IX, vermis VIII and IX, and middle peduncle, but the texture analysis revealed additional differences in the dentate nucleus, lobules VI and VII, vermis VI and VII. This comparison emphasizes how T1-weighted intensity and texture-based methods can provide a complementary anatomical structure analysis. While texture-based similarity shows high sensitivity for gray matter differences, T1-weighted intensity shows sensitivity for the detection of white matter differences.Entities:
Keywords: Parkinson's disease; cerebellar analysis; essential tremors; texture analysis
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33755270 PMCID: PMC8090778 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Brain Mapp ISSN: 1065-9471 Impact factor: 5.038
Demographic and clinical data
| Parkinson's disease | Essential tremor |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | 280 | 109 | |
| Age at scan (years) | 62.1 ± 8.4 | 66.1 ± 9.6 | < .01 |
| Sex (F/M) | 97/183 | 59/50 | < .01 |
| UPDRS‐III off | 42.35 ± 11.98 | — | — |
| WHIGET off | — | 28.40 ± 9.19 | — |
Kruskal–Wallis test.
FIGURE 1Processing pipeline. (Yellow) Common pre‐processing steps applied on the input MRIs prior to all three analyses. (Green) Processing steps for the T1‐w intensity analysis performed at the voxel level. (Blue) Processing steps for the texture‐based similarity analysis performed at the voxel level. (Red) Processing steps for the texture‐based similarity analysis performed at the region level
FIGURE 2Example of two texture‐based similarity maps after nonrigid registration to the MNI template. On the left side, a patient suffering from Parkinson's disease and on the right an age‐ and gender‐matched patient suffering from essential tremor
FIGURE 3Voxel‐wise T1w intensity analysis. Sagittal (top two rows), coronal (middle two rows) and axial (bottom two rows) views display the average of T1‐w MRI over the entire considered cohort, with the spatial distribution of regression coefficients for voxels with discriminant intensity difference in color overlay. The p‐value maps correspond to the diagnosis effect. p‐values were adjusted using FDR‐correction with a discovery rate set to q = .05. Only coefficients with p values inferior to .05 are displayed
FIGURE 5(a) Illustration of the segmentation protocol used in our study. (b) p‐values obtained from the region‐wise analysis of the texture descriptors after FDR correction. (c, d) Percentage of discovery per cerebellar region (estimated as the ratio of the number of voxels having significant differences over the volume of each corresponding region) for T1‐weighted intensity and texture, respectively
FIGURE 4Voxel‐wise texture similarity analysis. Sagittal (top two rows), coronal (middle two rows) and axial (bottom two rows) views showing the average of T1‐w MRI over the entire considered cohort with the spatial distribution of voxels with discriminant texture differences in overlay. The p‐value maps correspond to the diagnosis effect. p‐values were adjusted using FDR‐correction with a discovery rate set to q = .05. Only p‐values inferior to .05 are displayed. We note that the values shown in this figure indicate group differences but do not represent a directional relationship (unlike Figure 3). This is because we analyze the texture similarity feature which estimates specific labels +1 and − 1 for the PD and ET groups respectively, rather than analyzing the raw texture features directly